Search

Background: Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) has been recognized as a prognostic factor for several types of lung cancers. However, information regarding its clinical significance in pulmonary lymphoepithelial carcinoma is limited. Therefore, this study investigated effects of STAS on the clinical outcomes for patients with pulmonary lymphoepithelial carcinoma., Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed 56 surgically resected pulmonary lymphoepithelial carcinomas. The study defined STAS as the presence of tumor cells within air spaces in lung parenchyma beyond the tumor edge. Artifacts were excluded. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model., Results: In 18 patients (32.1%), STAS was observed and found to be associated with larger tumor size (>3 cm) (p = 0.009), higher pathologic stage (p = 0.026), and tumor necrosis (p = 0.046). Patients with STAS had a significantly lower 5-year RFS rate (p = 0.025). Multivariate analysis showed that STAS was an independent predictor of worse RFS (hazard ratio, 3.395; p = 0.038). Patients with STAS had a significantly increased risk of locoregional recurrence (p = 0.049)., Conclusions: The study findings suggest that STAS is an independent predictor of poor RFS. Based on these findings, a new three-tier grading system based on the patterns of tumor border and STAS was proposed for effective prediction of 5-year RFS in pulmonary lymphoepithelial carcinoma., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment intensities (TIs) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)., Methods: The study assessed newly diagnosed, non-metastatic NPC patients from the Taiwan Cancer Registry between 2010 and 2017. TIs were divided into four groups: TI1 [radiotherapy (RT) alone or induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by RT); TI2 (concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone); TI3 (IC followed by CRT or CRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC)]; and TI4 (IC followed by CRT followed by AC). The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival (CSS)., Results: The study included 9863 patients. For stage I-II NPC patients, there was no significant difference in CSS among the different TI groups. For stage III patients, those receiving TI3 had better CSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69) compared with those receiving TI1. No significant differences in CSS were noted among those receiving TI2, TI3, and TI4. For stage IVA-B patients, those receiving TI2 (HR 0.70), TI3 (HR 0.49), and TI4 (HR 0.43) had better CSS compared with those receiving TI1. Compared with stage IVA-B patients receiving TI2, those receiving TI3 (HR 0.70) and TI4 (HR 0.61) had significantly better CSS. No differences in CSS were noted between those receiving TI3 and TI4., Conclusions: For stage I-II NPC patients, RT alone is appropriate. For stage III and IVA-B patients, IC + CRT or CRT + AC may be needed to achieve optimal outcomes. No advantage of IC + CRT + AC over IC + CRT or CRT + AC was observed., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Purpose: This study aims to raise awareness of the disparities in survival predictions among races in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients by developing and validating population-based prognostic models specifically tailored for Taiwanese and Asian populations., Methods: A total of 49,137 patients diagnosed with HNCs were included from the Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR). Six prognostic models, divided into three categories based on surgical status, were developed to predict both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival using the registered demographic and clinicopathological characteristics in the Cox proportional hazards model. The prognostic models underwent internal evaluation through a tenfold cross-validation among the TCR Taiwanese datasets and external validation across three primary racial populations using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Predictive performance was assessed using discrimination analysis employing Harrell's c-index and calibration analysis with proportion tests., Results: The TCR training and testing datasets demonstrated stable and favorable predictive performance, with all Harrell's c-index values ≥ 0.7 and almost all differences in proportion between the predicted and observed mortality being < 5%. In external validation, Asians exhibited the best performance compared with white and black populations, particularly in predicting OS, with all Harrell's c-index values > 0.7., Conclusions: Survival predictive disparities exist among different racial groups in HNCs. We have developed population-based prognostic models for Asians that can enhance clinical practice and treatment plans., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: In studies of stage IV epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), <10% of patients underwent surgery; thus, the effect of surgery in these patients remains unclear. We investigated whether primary lung tumor resection could improve the survival of patients with stage IV EGFR-mutant NSCLC without progression after first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment., Methods: This retrospective case-control study included patients treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs without progression on follow-up imaging. Patients in the surgery group (n = 56) underwent primary tumor resection, followed by TKI maintenance therapy. Patients in the control group (n = 224; matched for age, metastatic status, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status) received only TKI maintenance therapy. Local ablative therapy for distant metastasis was allowed in both groups. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints were overall survival, failure patterns, and complications/adverse events., Results: The median time from TKI treatment to surgery was 5.1 months. For the surgery and control groups, the median follow-up periods were 34.0 and 38.5 months, respectively, with a median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival of 29.6 (18.9-40.3) and 13.0 (11.8-14.2) months, respectively (P < 0.001). Progression occurred in 29/56 (51.8%) and 207/224 (92.4%) patients, respectively. The median overall survival in the surgery group was not reached. The rate of surgical complications of grade ≥2 was 12.5%; complications were treated conservatively., Conclusions: Primary tumor resection is feasible for patients with EGFR-mutant nonprogressed NSCLC during first-line EGFR-TKI treatment and may improve survival better than maintenance EGFR-TKI therapy alone., (© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Purpose: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most malignant cancers with poor survival. The latest edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system classifies the majority of operable pancreatic cancer patients as stage-III, while dramatic heterogeneity is observed among these patients. Therefore, subgrouping is required to accurately predict their prognosis and define a treatment plan. This study conducts a cohort study to provide a more precise classification system for stage-III pancreatic cancer patients by utilizing clinical variables., Methods: We analyzed survival using log-rank tests, univariate Cox-regression models, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves for stage-III pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients from the Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR). Patients were further divided into subgroups using classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm. All results were validated using the SEER database., Results: Among stage-III PDAC patients, lymph node and tumor grade showed significant association with survival. Patients with N2 stage had higher mortality risks (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-3.08, p < 0.0001) than N0 patients. Patients with grade 3 also had higher risk of mortality (HR = 3.80, 95% CI 2.25-6.39, p < 0.0001) than grade 1 patients. The CART algorithm stratified stage-III patients into four subgroups with significantly different survival rates. The median survival of the four subgroups was 23.5, 18.4, 14.5, and 9.0 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Similar results were observed with SEER data., Conclusions: Lymph node involvement and tumor grade are predictive factors for survival in stage-III PDAC patients. This new precise classification system can be used to guide treatment planning in advanced-stage pancreatic cancer., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Colon cancer is the third most incident and life-threatening cancer in Taiwan. A comprehensive survival prediction system would greatly benefit clinical practice in this area. This study was designed to develop an accurate prognostic model for colon cancer patients by using clinicopathological variables obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database., Methods: We analyzed 20,218 colon cancer patients from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database, who were diagnosed between 2007 and 2015, were followed up until December 31, 2017, and had undergone curative surgery. We proposed two prognostic models, with different combinations of predictors. The first model used only traditional clinical features. The second model included several colon cancer site-specific factors (circumferential resection margin, perineural invasion, obstruction, and perforation), in addition to the traditional features. Both prediction models were developed by using a Cox proportional hazards model. Furthermore, we investigated whether race is a significant predictor of survival in colon cancer patients by using Model 1 on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry dataset., Results: The proposed models displayed a robust prediction performance (all Harrell's c-index >0.8). For both the calibration and validation steps, the differences between the predicted and observed mortality were mostly less than 5%., Conclusions: The prediction model (Model 1) is an effective predictor of survival regardless of the ethnic background of patients and can potentially help to provide better prediction of colon cancer-specific survival outcomes, thus allowing physicians to improve treatment plans., (© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: The choice between wedge resection and segmentectomy as a sublobar resection method for patients with cT1N0 lung cancer remains debatable. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes after wedge resection and segmentectomy for patients with cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma., Methods: The study enrolled 1002 consecutive patients with cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma who underwent sublobar resection at the authors' institution between 2011 and 2017. A propensity score-matching analysis was used to compared the clinical outcomes between the wedge resection and segmentectomy groups., Results: Wedge resection was performed for 810 patients (80.8%), and segmentectomy was performed for 192 patients (19.2%). Wedge resection resulted in better perioperative outcomes than segmentectomy. The multivariate analysis showed that the significant risk factors for poor disease-free survival (DFS) were elevated preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, total tumor diameter greater than 2 cm, and a consolidation-to-tumor (C/T) ratio higher than 50%. After propensity-matching, no differences in overall survival or DFS were noted between the two matched groups. However, subgroup analysis showed that segmentectomy was associated with better DFS than wedge resection (p = 0.039) for the patients with a tumor diameter greater than 2 cm and a C/T ratio higher than 50%., Conclusion: Segmentectomy is the appropriate surgical method for sublobar resection in cT1N0 lung adenocarcinoma patients with a tumor diameter greater than 2 cm and a C/T ratio higher than 50%. Wedge resection may be a safe and feasible sublobar resection method for patients with a tumor diameter of 2 cm or smaller or a C/T ratio of 50% or lower., (© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

A new cell line, CA5171, derived from a chemotherapy-naive, high-grade undifferentiated ovarian carcinoma was established and characterized. The CA5171 cells presented with cobblestone morphology and a doubling time of 24 hours. Gene mutation analysis showed that the cells belonged to the type II ovarian cancer pathway with mutations of PIK3CA, PTEN, and TP53. Single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis showed no homozygous gene deletion; however, several loci of gene copy number gains were noted in chromosome 1, 2, 5, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 20, and X. The in vitro and in vivo experiments showed that the cells were sensitive to paclitaxel and doxorubicin, but resistant to cisplatin. The cells also presented epithelial-mesenchymal transition properties that may have been related to their invasion and migration potential. The CA5171 cells show the potential as a new cell line for studies on epithelial ovarian carcinoma., (© The Author(s) 2014.)