Search

Background: This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for resection following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)., Methods: This retrospective single-center study assessed 193 consecutive patients with localized PDAC (104 males and 89 females; mean age, 61.1 ± 9.4 years) who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery between January 2010 and March 2021. Combined resectability and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 evaluation before and after neoadjuvant therapy was used to determine whether patients were eligible for resection according to the NCCN criteria. Post-surgical overall survival (OS), recurrence free survival (RFS), and pathologic results were evaluated and compared between patients considered eligible according to the NCCN criteria and those considered ineligible. Preoperative factors associated with better OS and RFS also were investigated., Results: Of the 193 patients, 168 (87.0 %) were eligible for resection according to the NCCN criteria. The patients eligible according to the NCCN criteria showed marginally longer OS than those considered ineligible (p = 0.056). After adjustment of variables, meeting the NCCN criteria for resection was an independent predictor of better OS (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95 % confidence interval, 0.34-0.96; p = 0.034). The two groups had similar RFS. Lower T-staging (T2 or less) and less lympho-vascular invasion and peri-neural invasion were noted in the patients who met the NCCN criteria (p ≤ 0.045)., Conclusions: The patients eligible for resection according to the NCCN criteria showed a trend toward longer OS and better pathologic results than the patients considered ineligible., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the different versions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for defining resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in predicting margin-negative (R0) resection, and to assess inter-reader agreement., Methods: This retrospective study included 283 patients (mean age, 65.1 years ± 9.4 [SD]; 155 men) who underwent upfront pancreatectomy for PDAC between 2017 and 2019. Two radiologists independently determined the resectability on preoperative CT according to the 2017, 2019, and 2020 NCCN guidelines. The sensitivity and specificity for R0 resection were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using kappa statistics., Results: R0 resection was accomplished in 239 patients (84.5%). The sensitivity and specificity averaged across two readers were, respectively, 76.6% and 29.5% for the 2020 guidelines, 74.1% and 32.9% for the 2019 guidelines, and 72.6% and 34.1% for the 2017 guidelines. Compared with the 2020 guidelines, both 2019 and 2017 guidelines showed significantly lower sensitivity for R0 resection (p ≤ .009). Specificity was significantly higher with the 2017 guidelines (p = .043) than with the 2020 guidelines. Inter-reader agreements for determining the resectability of PDCA were strong (k ≥ 0.83) with all guidelines, being highest with the 2020 guidelines (k = 0.91)., Conclusion: The 2020 NCCN guidelines showed significantly higher sensitivity for prediction of R0 resection than the 2017 and 2019 guidelines., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments have become the mainstay of first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there has been a concern that intrahepatic HCC lesions may be less responsive to ICI monotherapy. We aimed to investigate the organ-specific response patterns among unresectable HCC patients treated with first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab or lenvatinib., Methods: This retrospective study included 386 patients with Child-Pugh A unresectable HCC who were treated with first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab (n = 217) or lenvatinib (n = 169). The organ-specific response was separately evaluated according to the site of the lesions: liver, lung, lymph node (LN), and intraabdomen based on a radiological evaluation adopted from RECIST v 1.1., Results: The median age was 60 years. Hepatitis B infection was the most common etiology (n = 270, 69.9%), and 291 (75.4%) patients had a viral etiology. The proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 30% reduction in the tumor burden for each organ category was overall higher in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab group than that in the lenvatinib group: 20.2% vs. 11.8%, 23.0% vs. 12.2%, 27.9% vs. 17.9% and 33.3% vs. 15.0% for intrahepatic, lung, LN, and intraabdominal lesions, respectively. The corresponding values for the subgroup with a viral etiology were 17.3% vs. 8.1%, 18.8% vs. 13.3%, 28.9% vs. 3.6%, and 36.0% vs. 12.5%, respectively., Conclusion: Compared to lenvatinib, atezolizumab-bevacizumab was associated with a favorable organ-specific response regardless of the site of the tumor lesions. Unlike anti-PD-1 monotherapy, atezolizumab-bevacizumab had a comparable organ-specific response between intrahepatic and extrahepatic lesions, especially for those with viral etiology HCCs., (© 2024. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Lanreotide autogel is a long-acting somatostatin analogue with proven efficacy and safety in patients with well-differentiated (WD) gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) in a prior randomized phase III trial (CLARINET). However, the CLARINET study only enrolled patients with Ki-67 index <10%, and few patients of Asian ethnicity were included. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of lanreotide in Korean patients with GEP-NETs in the daily practice setting. Between January 2015 and May 2018, 64 patients with metastatic WD GEP-NETs received lanreotide at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Of them, 45 (70.3%) patients who received lanreotide as monotherapy were included in the current analysis. The most common primary tumor site was the pancreas (n = 22, 48.9%), followed by the rectum (10, 22.2%) and the small bowel (7, 15.6%). According to RECIST v1.1, a partial response was achieved in one patient (2.2%) and stable disease was achieved in 40 patients (88.9%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.4 months (95% confidence interval, 9.5-23.3 months). There were no differences in PFS according to the primary tumor site (p = 0.77). Hepatic tumor volume > 25% and prior systemic therapy were significantly associated with poorer PFS in the multivariate analysis. Lanreotide is well-tolerated and effective for Korean patients with GEP-NETs in the daily practice setting.

Background Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) is standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). However, prognostic factors for patients with mPC treated with AG, are largely unknown. We retrospectively identified prognostic factors, including inflammation-based prognostic scores, in patients with mPC, and recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with AG as first-line treatment. Method A total of 203 patients with histologically-confirmed recurrent or metastatic pancreatic cancer who were treated with first-line AG in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between February 2016 and December 2016 were included in this analysis. As inflammation-based scores, baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and modified Glasgow prognostic scores (mGPS) were tested. Result Median age was 62 years and 116 patients (57%) were male. With median follow-up duration of 21.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 (95% CI 6.2-7.9) months, and overall survival (OS) was 15.1 (95% CI 12.6-17.6) months. In the multivariate analysis, PFS was significantly associated with liver metastasis (HR 1.43), distant lymph node metastasis (HR 1.48), and elevated CA19-9 (HR 1.56). In multivariate analysis for OS, elevated CA19-9 (HR 1.75), liver metastasis (HR 1.76), distant lymph node metastasis (HR 1.41), and high mGPS (mGPS ≥1 vs.0: HR 1.64) were independent prognostic factors. NLR and PLR were not significantly associated with PFS and OS. Conclusion Among the inflammation based prognostic scores, mGPS was a reliable prognostic indicator that could stratify survival outcomes in patients with recurrent or mPC who received AG as first-line chemotherapy.

Background The objective of this study was to assess the safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor efficacy of CKD-581, a novel pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma (MM) refractory to standard therapy. Methods In this phase I study, CKD-581 was intravenously administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. A standard 3 + 3 cohort design was used to determine the MTD. Acetylated histones H3 and H4 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were measured for pharmacodynamic assessment in a subpopulation of patients. Results Thirty-nine patients were treated with CKD-581 at 9 dose levels from 10 mg/m 2 to 210 mg/m 2 . The DLTs were grade 3 neutropenia that delayed the treatment for >2 weeks (one patient at a dose of 50 mg/m 2 ) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (two patients at a dose of 210 mg/m 2 ). The MTD of CKD-581 was 160 mg/m 2 . The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n = 5, 12.8%) and neutropenia (n = 2, 5.1%). The peak concentration and area under the curve values for CKD-581 increased in proportion to the dose, indicating linear pharmacokinetics. A partial response was observed in 2 patients (5.6%), and stable disease was observed in 16 (44.4%) patients. In the pharmacodynamic evaluation, acetylation of H3 and H4 was observed at all doses of ≥50 mg/m 2 . Conclusion CKD-581 was well tolerated by the patients with lymphoma or MM refractory to standard therapy. It exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and modest anti-tumor efficacy.

Purpose nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) and FOLFIRINOX have been established as standard first-line treatment in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). We performed retrospective analysis comparing the efficacies of AG and FOLFIRINOX in daily practice setting. Materials and Methods We analyzed 308 patients who presented initially as mPC and received AG (n = 149) or FOLFIRINOX (n = 159) as first-line treatment between 2013 and 2016. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Result There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, except older age and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score in AG group. The response rates (34% vs 34%) and median PFS (6.8 vs 5.1 months) were comparable between two groups (p = 0.88 and p = 0.19, respectively), while median OS was significantly better with AG than FOLFIRINOX (11.4 vs 9.6 months; p = 0.002). Elevated baseline CA19-9 level and liver metastasis were independent adverse prognostic factors for PFS and OS. In subgroup analyses, PFS with AG was better in patients with age ≥ 65 years, peritoneal metastasis, and higher CCI than that with FOLFIRINOX. Conclusion Both AG and FOLFIRINOX showed comparable efficacy outcomes in daily practice setting. AG might be preferentially considered in patients with peritoneal metastasis, comorbid medical conditions or old age.

Background We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic value of inflammation-based prognostic scores, including the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), exclusively in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Methods Between May 2010 and April 2015, 305 patients with histologically documented unresectable or metastatic iCCA were treated with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis). Among these, 257 patients had complete data for inflammation-based prognostic scores and were included. Results Median age was 59 (range: 27-78) years, and 158 patients (61.5%) were males. High mGPS was independently associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS; mGPS ≥1 vs. 0: median, 3.9 vs. 5.5 months; P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS; mGPS ≥1 vs. 0; median, 6.9 vs. 14.1 months; P = 0.002) in the multivariate analysis. Regarding high NLR (> median) and PLR (> median), although a potential association existed with poor PFS or OS in the univariate analysis, these did not remain as significant in the multivariate analyses. Conclusion The current study suggests that mGPS might be the relevant prognostic index that could stratify the survival outcomes of patients with unresectable or metastatic iCCA who received first-line GemCis.

Because the number of cytotoxic agents available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is limited, rechallenge with the same chemotherapy agents can provide a continuum of treatment. This study investigated the efficacy and feasibility of oxaliplatin rechallenge in mCRC patients who had been previously exposed to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were included if they had mCRC and evaluable disease, had remained disease-free or progression-free for at least 6 months after the last dose of prior oxaliplatin-based therapy, and were retreated with oxaliplatin therapy. Between January 2009 and May 2014, 110 patients were retreated with oxaliplatin-based regimens; of these, 42 (38.2%) had received prior oxaliplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy and 68 (61.8%) as palliative chemotherapy. The overall response rate to oxaliplatin rechallenge was 30.9% (34/110), and the disease control rate was 68.2% (75/110), with one patient achieving complete response, 33 achieving partial response, and 41 having stable disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival following oxaliplatin rechallenge were 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-7.4 months) and 18.5 months (95% CI, 14.0-23.0 months), respectively. Sixteen patients experienced grade 2 or 3 neuropathy. Ten patients experienced any grade hypersensitivity reaction within four cycles of treatment, including six who stopped treatment due to grade 3 or 4 hypersensitivity reactions. Rechallenge with oxaliplatin-based therapy may be an option for patients who achieve at least 6 months of disease-free or progression-free survival with prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. However, neurotoxicity and hypersensitivity reactions should be carefully monitored in this setting.

Introduction Germline BRCA mutations may have therapeutic implications as surrogate markers of DNA-damage repair status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We performed a prospective study to evaluate the efficiency of risk criteria based on personal or family history of breast and ovarian cancer for determining germline BRCA mutations in PDAC patients with Asian ethnicity. Methods Between November 2015 and May 2016, we screened consecutive PDAC patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease who were referred for systemic chemotherapy. Analyses for germline BRCA mutations were performed if patients had one or more first-degree or second-degree relatives with breast or ovarian cancers or had a personal medical history of these diseases. DNA was extracted from whole blood, and all coding exons and their flanking intron regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 were sequenced. Results A total of 175 patients were screened for personal and family history and 10 (5.7%) met the inclusion criteria for genetic sequencing. Pathogenic germline BRCA2 mutation [c.7480C>T (p.Arg2494*)] was identified in one male patient, resulting in a frequency of 10% for the risk-stratified patients and 0.6% for the unselected PDAC population. Two patients had germline BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance [c.1744A>C (p.Thr582Pro) and c.68-7T>A]. Conclusion Personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancers is a feasible, cost-effective risk categorization for screening germline BRCA mutations in Asian PDAC patients as 10% of this population had the pathogenic mutation herein. Future validation from a large, prospective cohort is needed.

Background: The impact of microsatellite instability (MSI) on survival in stage III colon cancer treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin combination (FOLFOX) chemotherapy is not clear. We evaluated the association between MSI and survival in this population., Methods: We analyzed 598 patients with curatively resected stage III colon cancer treated with adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy. We determined MSI status using polymerase chain reaction amplification; tumors were classified as high MSI (MSI-H, ≥2 unstable markers), low MSI (MSI-L, 1 unstable marker), or microsatellite stable (MSS, no unstable marker)., Results: Of 598 patients, 8.4% showed MSI-H. Tumors classified as MSI-H were more commonly located in the ascending colon (54.0 vs. 27.7%, p < 0.0001) and had poorly differentiated features (32.0 vs. 8.0%, p < 0.0001). After the median follow-up of 52.8 months, 5-year disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 77.0 and 85.9%, respectively. In univariate analysis, pathologic T4 (pT4) and pathologic N2 (pN2) was associated with reduced DFS (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and OS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively), whereas MSI status did not affect either DFS (p = 0.114) or OS (p = 0.525). In patients with pN2 tumors; however, MSI-H was associated with better survival compared with MSS/MSI-L; DFS and OS in patients with MSI-H/pN2 were comparable to those in patients with pN1 tumors., Conclusions: In patients with stage III colon cancer treated with adjuvant FOLFOX, pT4 and pN2 was associated with reduced survival, but MSI status alone did not affect survival.

Background: Mismatch repair (MMR) status has been proposed, with some controversy, as a prognostic and predictive marker in stage II colon cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between MMR and survival in stage II colon cancer., Methods: A total of 860 patients with curatively resected stage II colon cancer were selected for inclusion between January 2003 and December 2008. Tumors lacking expression of MLH1 and/or MSH2, as determined by immunohistochemistry, were classified as having deficient MMR (dMMR), whereas other tumors were classified as having proficient MMR (pMMR). Clinical risk (CR) factors were used to divide patients into high or standard CR groups., Results: Of 860 patients, 14.7 % were dMMR, 42.4 % had ≥1 CR factors, and 85.8 % patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. MMR status did not affect disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR] 1.191, p = 0.415) or overall survival (OS; HR 1.300, p = 0.344). Among CR factors, only pathologic T4 disease tended to associate with poor OS (HR 1.979, p = 0.071). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better DFS (HR 0.393, p < 0.0001) in patients with pMMR tumors. However, in patients with dMMR tumors, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with DFS., Conclusions: MMR status did not affect DFS or OS in patients with stage II colon cancer. In patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, dMMR was not associated with DFS and OS. However, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved DFS in pMMR patients.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of single and multiple doses of intravenous CG200745, a novel histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies., Experimental Design: Two to six patients received intravenous CG200745 according to the 2 + 4 dose-escalating method. This first-in-human trial was comprised of two parts: Part 1 was a single ascending dose, and Part 2 was multiple ascending doses weekly for 3 weeks, and then 1 week off. For the first cycle, pharmacokinetic sampling for CG200745 and pharmacodynamic sampling for acetylated histone H4 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were performed on day 1 for Part 1 and on days 1 and 15 for Part 2. Examination of acetylated histone H4 in pre- and post-biopsy samples was performed in accessible patients., Results: In all, 28 patients were treated at 13 dose levels (1.8-250 mg/m(2)) and received a total of 71 cycles of CG200745. Hematologic toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia (22.2 %) that did not last a week and non-hematologic toxicities included fatigue (22.2 %) and anorexia (16.7 %) that did not exceed grade 2. No dose-limiting toxic effects were noted. Dose proportionality was observed for both the maximum concentration and area under the curve. The elimination half-life was 5.67 ± 2.69 h (mean ± standard deviation). An increase in PBMC acetylated histone H4 was observed at dose levels up to 51 mg/m(2), which plateaued at higher dose levels. At 24 h, 75 % of patients (6/8) showed higher relative acetylation in tumor tissue compared to PBMCs. Although there was no partial or complete response, 57.1 % of patients (16/28) had stable disease that lasted at least 6 weeks., Conclusions: CG200745 can be safely administered at effective dose levels that inhibit HDAC in PBMCs and tumor tissue. Although MTD was not reached, further escalation was not performed because acetylated histone H4 plateaued at dose levels higher than 51 mg/m(2). Additional phase II trials are recommended at 250 mg/m(2).

Purpose: Preclinical data has demonstrated the potential of simvastatin to overcome cetuximab resistance in KRAS mutant CRC patients. Therefore, we designed a study using simvastatin/cetuximab/irinotecan for KRAS mutant CRC patients who are refractory to irinotecan and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: In this phase II study, patients received 500 mg/m(2) cetuximab, 150-180 mg/m(2) (day 1), and 80 mg simvastatin (once daily, days 1-14, every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the disease control rate (DCR), and safety. We also analyzed the relationship between the RAS gene expression signature score and treatment response to simvastatin/cetuximab/irinotecan., Results: Fifty-two KRAS mutant CRC patients were enrolled. The ORR (complete response [CR], 0; partial response [PR], 1) was 1.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], -1.8-5.6). The DCR (CR, 0; PR, 1; stable disease, 33) was 65.4 % (95 % CI, 52.5-78.3). The median PFS and OS from the time of study drug administration were 7·6 months (95 % CI, 4.4-10.8) and 12.8 months (95 % CI, 9.5-16.2), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were anemia (28.8 %), neutropenia (13.5 %), and diarrhea (7.7 %). The RAS signature score was significantly correlated with the maximal change in target lesions from baseline (r = 0.57, P = 0.014)., Conclusion: The simvastatin/cetuximab/irinotecan regimen showed promising efficacy and safety in KRAS mutant CRC patients who failed irinotecan and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The RAS signature may be a novel predictor of treatment response to cetuximab-combined chemotherapy in CRC patients.

The MET proto-oncogene product, which is the receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), has been implicated in tumorigenesis and metastatic progression. Point mutations in MET lead to the aberrant activation of the receptor in many types of human malignancies, and the deregulated activity of MET has been correlated with tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. MET has therefore attracted considerable attention as a potential target in anticancer therapy. Here, we report that a novel MET kinase inhibitor, NPS-1034, inhibits various constitutively active mutant forms of MET as well as HGF-activated wild-type MET. NPS-1034 inhibited the proliferation of cells expressing activated MET and promoted the regression of tumors formed from such cells in a mouse xenograft model through anti-angiogenic and pro-apoptotic actions. NPS-1034 also inhibited HGF-stimulated activation of MET signaling in the presence or absence of serum. Furthermore, when tested on 27 different MET variants, NPS-1034 inhibited 15 of the 17 MET variants that exhibited autophosphorylation with nanomolar potency; only the F1218I and M1149T variants were not inhibited by NPS-1034. Notably, NPS-1034 inhibited three MET variants that are resistant to the MET inhibitors SU11274, NVP-BVU972, and PHA665752. Together, these results suggest that NPS-1034 can be used as a potent therapeutic agent for human malignancies bearing MET point mutations or expressing activated MET.

Deregulation of the PI3K-AKT/mTOR pathway due to mutation of the tumor suppressor gene PTEN frequently occurs in human prostate cancer and is therefore considered to be an attractive therapeutic target. Here, we investigated how the PTEN genotype affected the antitumor effect of NVP-BEZ235 in human prostate cancer cells. In this setting, NVP-BEZ235 induced cell death in a PTEN-independent manner. NVP-BEZ235 selectively induced apoptotic cell death in the prostate cancer cell line DU145, which harbors wild-type PTEN; however, in the PC3 cell line, which is PTEN-null, treatment with NVP-BEZ235 resulted in autophagic cell death. Consistently, NVP-BEZ235 treatment did not result in the cleavage of caspase-3; instead, it resulted in the conversion of LC3-I to LC3-II, indicating autophagic cell death; these results suggest that an alternate mechanism of cell death is induced by NVP-BEZ235 in PTEN-null prostate cancer cells. Based on our findings, we conclude that the PTEN/PI3K/Akt pathway is critical for prostate cancer survival, and targeting PI3K signaling by NVP-BEZ235 may be beneficial in the treatment of prostate cancer, independent of the PTEN genotype.

Several studies have reported that imatinib may induce tumor responses and prolonged disease stabilization in aggressive fibromatosis (AF). This effect may relate to the PDGFR-β pathway and KIT mutations. Sunitinib not only inhibits PDGFRs, KIT, and FLT3, it also blocks VEGFRs and thus serves as an antiangiogenic agent. The aim of this prospective multicenter uncontrolled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced AF. Nineteen patients with pathologically proven AF were recruited between June, 2008, and March, 2012, from three centers. One treatment cycle consisted of 37.5 mg/day sunitinib for 4 weeks without a break. The primary endpoint was tumor response rate according to RECIST 1.0. Ten (53 %) patients were female and the median age was 30 years (range, 22-67). Most of the primary sites were intra-abdominal (12, 63.2 %), and AF associated with familial adenomatous polyposis in ten patients (52.6 %). With a median of six cycles per patients (range, 1-47 cycles), five patients (26.3 %) achieved a partial response and eight (42.1 %) had stable disease. The overall response rate was 26.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 6.3-45.7) in intention-to-treat analysis. With a median follow-up time of 20.3 months (range, 1.8-50.7), the 2-year rates of progression-free and overall survival were 74.7 % and 94.4 %, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events of sunitinib that occurred in >5 % of patients were neutropenia (33.3 %), diarrhea (5.3 %), and hand-foot syndrome (5.3 %). In 3 of 12 patients with mesenteric AF, mesenteric mass bleeding (n = 1), bowel perforation (n = 1), and bowel fistula (n = 1) with tumor mass necrosis were observed early during sunitinib treatment. Therefore, sunitinib showed potential antitumor activity and may be useful for the management of non-mesenteric AF.

Purpose: This study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of DHP107, a novel oral paclitaxel containing neither Cremophor EL nor P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to all standard treatments were administered a single oral dose of DHP107 on a dose-escalating schedule (60-600 mg/m(2)) during the first chemotherapy cycle, and intravenous paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) during subsequent cycles. Cohorts of 3 patients were treated at each dose level provided no DLTs were observed. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and its metabolites were investigated for oral DHP107 and intravenous paclitaxel., Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities were not observed, even at the highest dose level (600 mg/m(2)). Further dose escalation was not performed because pharmacokinetics did not increase proportionally at doses above 250 mg/m(2). The coefficient of variance of AUClast DHP107 ranged from 11.8 % to 34.0 %, comparable to 24.4 % of intravenous paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2). There were no grade 4 toxicities, whereas grade 3 toxicities included diarrhea (12.1 %), neutropenia (6.1 %) and fatigue (3.0 %). While no objective responses were observed, 11 patients (33.3 %) showed stable disease., Conclusions: DHP107 was safe and feasible in patients with advanced malignancies. As exposure of paclitaxel plateau among patients receiving more than 250 mg/m(2) of DHP107, the dose escalation of DHP107 may be limited to 250 mg/m(2) in further clinical trials.

Background: To investigate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab beyond first progression combined with doublet chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer., Methods: This multicenter phase II study included 76 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer progressed after first-line bevacizumab plus doublet chemotherapy. Study treatment consisted of second-line continuation of bevacizumab plus crossover standard doublet chemotherapy, consisting of FOLFOX, CapeOX, or FOLFIRI. Bevacizumab was administered in doses of 5 mg/kg/2-week or 7.5 mg/kg/3-week according to the schedules of the combined regimen., Results: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 6.5 months (95 % CI, 5.2-7.8) and 12.8 months (95 % CI, 8.8-16.9), respectively, with no significant differences according to combined doublet chemotherapy. The response rate (RR) was 17.1 % (95 % CI, 8.6-5.6) with no statistical significance between regimens (p = 0.053). The first-line RR and PFS did not affect the second-line efficacy outcomes; RR (14.0 % vs 21.2 %, p = 0.405), median PFS (5.6 vs 6.7 months, p = 0.335), and OS (15.4 vs 11.0 months, p = 0.383) were not different between previous responders and non-responders, and the median PFS (p = 0.186) and OS (p = 0.495) were not different either according to the length of first-line PFS; however, OS from the first-line chemotherapy was longer in patients with longer first-line PFS (26.4 vs 14.8 months, p = 0.010). Bevacizumab-related significant adverse events included proteinuria (1.3 %) and thromboembolism (1.3 %)., Conclusions: Bevacizumab beyond first progression could be considered a treatment strategy even in patients progressed after first-line bevacizumab plus doublet chemotherapy. Second-line efficacy outcomes did not differ according to the first-line responses.

Background: Cetuximab plus irinotecan has been shown to be effective in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with wild-type (WT) KRAS and positive EGFR expressions (EGFR+). Retrospective analysis revealed that the efficacy of cetuximab was similar in mCRC patients negative (EGFR-) and positive for EGFR. However, the efficacy of cetuximab has not been assessed prospectively in EGFR- mCRC patients., Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of biweekly cetuximab (500 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (150-180 mg/m(2)) in patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma with WT-KRAS and measurable lesion(s), either EGFR + or EGFR-, determined immunohistochemically, who failed first-line irinotecan-containing chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and the secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Forty patients were enrolled; 20 EGFR + and 20 EGFR-; their baseline characteristics were balanced. The overall RR was 45% (18/40, 95% CI 29.6-60.4), 55% (11/20) in EGFR + and 35% (7/20) in EGFR- patients. Median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI 4.8-9.4), 8.3 months in EGFR + and 4.9 months in EGFR- patients. Median OS was 18.5 months (95% CI 15.2-21.8), 17.2 months in EGFR + and 18.5 months in EGFR- patients. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 5 patients (12.5%) and febrile neutropenia/skin rash/asthenia in 2 (5%)., Conclusions: Biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line treatment showed significant anti-tumor activity in patients with irinotecan-refractory mCRC and WT-KRAS regardless of EGFR expression status.

Purpose: A 3 week treatment schedule consisting of 2 weeks of S-1 therapy and 1 week of no therapy was introduced to reduce the toxicity and increase the convenience of combination chemotherapy. Hepatic dysfunction (HD) is common in patients with biliary tract cancer. A phase I study was conducted to assess the effects of a 3 week treatment schedule in Asian patients with or without HD., Methods: Forty-six patients were stratified into four groups, according to the HD criteria of the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group. A three dose escalation schema was used., Results: In the normal hepatic function group, two dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) events occurred among 12 patients at the prespecified maximal dose of 100 mg/m²/day. This dose was thereby established as the maximal tolerable dose (MTD). No DLT events were observed at the predefined maximal dose of 80 mg/m²/day in the mild HD group. In the moderate HD group, two DLT events occurred among five patients treated with 80 mg/m²/day, and the MTD was defined as 70 mg/m²/day. Two of six subjects in the severe HD group experienced DLT events at doses of 60 mg/m²/day and none developed DLT events at 50 mg/m²/day., Conclusions: The MTDs for a 3 week schedule of S-1 treatment were defined in patients with or without hepatic dysfunction. A 3 week treatment regimen of S-1 might be a platform for combination with newer cytotoxic agents or biologics.