1. Does boundary quantum mechanics imply quantum mechanics in the bulk?
- Author
-
Daniel Kabat and Gilad Lifschytz
- Subjects
High Energy Physics - Theory ,Physics ,Nuclear and High Energy Physics ,Field (physics) ,010308 nuclear & particles physics ,Analytic continuation ,Semiclassical physics ,FOS: Physical sciences ,AdS-CFT Correspondence ,01 natural sciences ,Linear map ,AdS/CFT correspondence ,Operator (computer programming) ,Correlation function ,High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th) ,Quantum mechanics ,0103 physical sciences ,Models of Quantum Gravity ,lcsh:QC770-798 ,lcsh:Nuclear and particle physics. Atomic energy. Radioactivity ,Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) ,010306 general physics - Abstract
Perturbative bulk reconstruction in AdS/CFT starts by representing a free bulk field $\phi^{(0)}$ as a smeared operator in the CFT. A series of $1/N$ corrections must be added to $\phi^{(0)}$ to represent an interacting bulk field $\phi$. These corrections have been determined in the literature from several points of view. Here we develop a new perspective. We show that correlation functions involving $\phi^{(0)}$ suffer from ambiguities due to analytic continuation. As a result $\phi^{(0)}$ fails to be a well-defined linear operator in the CFT. This means bulk reconstruction can be understood as a procedure for building up well-defined operators in the CFT which thereby singles out the interacting field $\phi$. We further propose that the difficulty with defining $\phi^{(0)}$ as a linear operator can be re-interpreted as a breakdown of associativity. Presumably $\phi^{(0)}$ can only be corrected to become an associative operator in perturbation theory. This suggests that quantum mechanics in the bulk is only valid in perturbation theory around a semiclassical bulk geometry., Comment: 22 pages. v2: references added
- Published
- 2018