Search

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of imaging features to predict lymph node status of colon cancer using CT., Methods: This was a retrospective study from 2 tertiary hospitals in South Korea and Netherlands. 317 Colon cancer patients who underwent primary surgical treatment were included. Number of lymph nodes according to the anatomical location, size, cluster, degree of attenuation, shape, presence of internal heterogeneity and ill-defined margin of the lymph node were assessed and compared according to histological lymph node status., Results: The largest short diameter of lymph node and presence of internal heterogeneity of lymph node showed significant association with malignant lymph node status (P < 0.001 and P = 0.041, respectively). The ROC curve analysis revealed AUC of 0.703 for the largest short diameter of lymph node (P < 0.001), and AUC of the presence of internal heterogeneity was 0.630 (P < 0.001). In addition, our study showed that a total number of lymph nodes, regardless of size, (P = 0.022) and number of lymph nodes in peritumoral area (P < 0.001) and along the mesenteric vessels (P < 0.001) on CT demonstrated significant association with malignant status of lymph nodes in colon cancer., Conclusions: There were significant associations between lymph node status and imaging features of lymph nodes on CT in colon cancer patients. The largest short diameter of lymph node and presence of internal heterogeneity can be used to predict the malignant status of lymph node in colon cancer patients. Also, the number of lymph nodes near the colonic tumor should be considered in assessment of colon cancer lymph node involvement on CT., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: To evaluate the learning curve for locoreginal staging of colon cancer in radiologist trainees., Methods: Eighty-eight cases of colon cancer CT were included in this retrospective study. Four senior radiology residents staged the CTs according to TNM classification. Two out of four radiologists received feedback after reading every 20 cases. Radiologic staging was compared with pathologic staging and the learning curve, diagnostic performance, reader confidence and reading time were evaluated and compared between the two groups (feedback vs. no feedback). Generalized estimating equations logistic regression, QICu statistic, ANOVA and t test/Mann-Whitney test were utilized., Results: Radiologists demonstrated a significant increase in their performance to distinguish between ≤ T2 and ≥ T3 and reached an inflection point at 38 cases, with a significant association with increased number of cases reviewed (P < 0.001). Sensitivity (P < 0.001), specificity (P = 0.030) and NPV (P = 0.002) demonstrated significant associations with increased experience. The overall reader's confidence was significantly higher in the group which received feedback (P < 0.001). There was no significant improvement in performance nor in reader's confidence for N staging (N0 vs. ≥ N1) for all readers. Reading time decreased with experience and showed a significant negative association with experience (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Diagnostic performance of senior radiology trainees in differentiating between T2 and T3 colon cancer on CTs improved with increased experience. In contrast, evaluation of lymph node involvement did not improve with more experience. Feedback had no significant effect on improvement of diagnostic performances.