Search

Objective: To evaluate the potential impact of consistent use of similar treatments over a long period; it is essential to investigate the potential correlation between genetic variations that influence the expression or function of pharmacological targets for reducing lipid levels and the risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis., Methods: We used variants in the following genes to conduct Mendelian randomization analyses: HMGCR (encoding the target for statins), PCSK9 (encoding the target for PCSK9 inhibitors, such as evolocumab and alirocumab), and NPC1L1 (encoding the target for ezetimibe). Data from lipid genetics consortia (173,082 sample size) were used to weight variations according to their correlations with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In two large datasets (total n = 19,562 cases, 501,655 controls). We conducted a meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization estimates, weighted by LDL-C levels, on the regional differences in the risk of rheumatoid arthritis using data from two large databases., Results: We approached SMR and IVW-MR analyses to examine the relationship between target gene expression (including HMGCR, PCSK9, and NPC1L1) and LDL-C levels mediated by these genes with RA. The IVW-MR analysis revealed no significant association between genetically predicted LDL-C concentration and the risk of RA (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.59-1.29; OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.67-1.23; OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.49-1.36; all p > 0.05). Similarly, our findings from the SMR approach provided no evidence to suggest that gene expression of HMGCR, PCSK9, and NPC1L1 was associated with the risk of RA (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.79-1.05, p = 0.207; OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.85-1.09, p = 0.493)., Conclusions: Our results do not provide evidence to support the hypothesis that reducing LDL-C levels with statins, alirocumab, or ezetimibe effectively prevents the risk of developing RA. However, our study provides valuable insights into the assessment of lipid-lowering agents in RA, which can enhance our understanding of the condition and assist in clinical practice by aiding in the determination and monitoring of RA status to clinical response., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

Background: This real-world study examined clinical characteristics and dyslipidemia management among patients initiating evolocumab across 12 European countries. Austrian data are reported., Methods: Data of consenting adults were collected for ≤ 6 months prior to evolocumab initiation (baseline) and ≤ 30 months post-initiation. Patient characteristics, lipid lowering therapy (LLT, i.e. statin and/or ezetimibe) and lipid values were collected from medical records., Results: In Austria, 363 patients were enrolled. At baseline, 52% of patients initiated evolocumab without background LLT; the median (Q1, Q3) initial low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level was 142 (111, 187) mg/dL. Within 3 months of evolocumab treatment, median LDL‑C decreased by 59% to 58 (37, 91) mg/dL. This reduction was maintained over time, despite consistently infrequent use of background LLT. LDL-C < 55 mg/dL was attained by 65% of patients (76% with, 55% without background LLT). Evolocumab persistence was ≥ 90% at month 12 and month 30., Conclusion: In Austria, patients were initiated on evolocumab at LDL‑C levels almost 3‑times higher than the guideline-recommended clinical goal (< 55 mg/dL). Persistence with evolocumab was very high. Evolocumab led to a rapid and sustained LDL‑C reduction with 65% attaining the LDL‑C goal. Patients using evolocumab in combination with statins and/or ezetimibe were more likely to attain their LDL‑C goal and thus decrease cardiovascular risk., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: It is clear from epidemiological studies that patients at high and very-high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) risk do not reach lipid guideline-recommended targets. Thus, fixed-dose combinations of statins/ezetimibe, bempedoic acid/ezetimibe and statins/fibrates may represent a further armamentarium in the field of lipid-lowering approaches in these individuals., Recent Findings: The combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe is not inferior to high-intensity statin monotherapy in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. Drug discontinuation or dose reduction is inferior with fixed-dose combination. The fixed-dose combination of bempedoic acid with ezetimibe is superior to bempedoic acid in monotherapy in lowering LDL-C and in reducing high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations. The combination fenofibrate with atorvastatin is superior to monotherapies in lowering triglycerides. Lipid-lowering fixed-dose combinations may guarantee a higher therapy adherence, representing a better approach to control plasma lipids and thus ameliorate ASCVD burden. Additional studies will define the advantages on cardiovascular outcomes in high and very high-risk patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society dyslipidaemia guidelines necessitate greater use of combination therapies. We describe a real-world cohort of patients in Austria and simulate the addition of oral bempedoic acid and ezetimibe to estimate the proportion of patients reaching goals., Methods: Patients at high or very high cardiovascular risk on lipid-lowering treatments (excluding proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors) from the Austrian cohort of the observational SANTORINI study were included using specific criteria. For patients not at their risk-based goals at baseline, addition of ezetimibe (if not already received) and subsequently bempedoic acid was simulated using a Monte Carlo simulation., Results: A cohort of patients (N = 144) with a mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 76.4 mg/dL, with 94% (n = 135) on statins and 24% (n = 35) on ezetimibe monotherapy or in combination, were used in the simulation. Only 36% of patients were at goal (n = 52). Sequential simulation of ezetimibe (where applicable) and bempedoic acid increased the proportion of patients at goal to 69% (n = 100), with a decrease in the mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from 76.4 mg/dL at baseline to 57.7 mg/dL overall., Conclusions: The SANTORINI real-world data in Austria suggest that a proportion of high and very high-risk patients remain below the guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. Optimising use of oral ezetimibe and bempedoic acid after statins in the lipid-lowering pathway could result in substantially more patients attaining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals, likely with additional health benefits., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: The Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) demonstrated the clinical benefit of the combination of ezetimibe-simvastatin compared to placebo-simvastatin following acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This review highlights key findings from this study with particular attention to the practice-changing impact on guidelines for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction after ACS, especially among high-risk populations., Recent Findings: Consistent reductions in LDL-C have been reported with newer lipid-lowering therapies (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, cholesterol ester transfer proteins, bempedoic acid) in combination with statin in high-risk subgroups. Since high-risk subgroups remain a focus of guidelines, exploration of high-risk subgroups can help define the optimal use of new therapies. Ezetimibe reduced the LDL-C by 16.7 mg/dL compared to placebo at 1 year, resulting in a significant reduction in the primary composite endpoint (absolute risk difference 2.0%; relative risk difference 6.4%, hazard ratio, 0.936; 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 0.99; P = 0.016). The benefits achieved with ezetimibe in both LDL-C reduction and the primary clinical composite across 10 pre-specified high-risk subgroups, including the elderly; women; patients with diabetes, prior coronary artery bypass graft, history of stroke, polyvascular disease, low baseline LDL-C, renal dysfunction, prior heart failure, and an elevated TIMI risk score for secondary prevention, were similar or greater than in the corresponding non-high-risk subgroups. Safety events were similar between ezetimibe and placebo across the high-risk subgroups. These data support the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy in high-risk patients who require additional therapy to lower the LDL-C post-ACS., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose of Review: Despite the elevation of lipid values during pregnancy is mostly physiological, evidence suggest that it may be associated with adverse events. This article reviews the characteristics of lipid disorders and the possible management with dyslipidemia in pregnant women., Recent Findings: Among many available groups of lipid-lowering drugs, only bile acid sequestrants are approved for the treatment of dyslipidemia during pregnancy. Ezetimibe and fenofibrate might be considered if benefits outweigh the potential risk. Statins are still contraindicated due to the results mainly from animal studies and series of human cases. However, recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed that their use may not be detrimental, and in some selected cases may be beneficial. Especially, in some groups of pregnant patients with very high cardiovascular risk-those already after an event, or with established cardiovascular disease, with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; in such cases the final decision should weight the potential risk of discontinuation of therapy. Finally, we need to wait for the data with new drugs, including PCSK9 inhibitors and especially inclisiran, which (still hypothetically) might be a very interesting option as it may be used just before the pregnancy and immediately after with the duration of about 9 months between injections. The decisions on lipid-lowering therapy in pregnant patients should be individualized. Despite design and ethical difficulties with such studies, further investigations on dyslipidemia treatment during pregnancy are highly awaited., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most frequent cause of death in Austria. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines recommend intensive lipid lowering therapy (LLT) in patients at high or very high CV risk. Lipid management and achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals in Austria have not recently been assessed., Methods: Subgroup analysis for Austria of a European 18 country, cross-sectional, observational study. Patients received LLT for primary (PP) or secondary prevention (SP). Data including LLT in the preceding 12 months and most recent LDL‑C were collected during a single visit between June 2017 and November 2018. Achievement of the risk-based 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS LDL‑C goal while receiving stabilized LLT was assessed., Results: A total of 293 patients were enrolled from 8 Austrian sites, of which 200 (PP = 104, SP = 96) received stabilized LLT at the LDL‑C measurement date. Overall, 58% (71% PP, 43% SP) and 38% (52% PP, 23% SP) achieved the risk-based 2016 and 2019 goals, respectively. Most patients received moderate-intensity statin monotherapy (46%), while 34% used high-intensity statin monotherapy. Combination therapy of moderate/high-intensity statin with ezetimibe (12%), or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors with statin ± ezetimibe (1%), was used infrequently., Conclusion: The current Austrian routine lipid management using mainly moderate-intensity or high-intensity statin monotherapy is insufficient to attain ESC/EAS guideline goals, in particular the more stringent 2019 recommendations, a situation comparable to other participating European countries. In addition to switching to and optimizing doses of high-intensity statins, a combination with ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors will be needed in many cases., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: For many years, the lipid-lowering armamentarium consisted of statins and/or ezetimibe and/or bile acid sequestrants and/or fibrates. Now, with the availability of new drugs mostly injectables, the field has changed and the role of oral non-statin drugs (including bempedoic acid) must be reevaluated., Recent Findings: Ezetimibe remains a very important combination partner for statins with continuously increasing treatment numbers. Bempedoic acid is another interesting combination partner for statin/ezetimibe or ezetimibe alone but lacks in contrast to ezetimibe evidence from outcome trials. The role of fibrates is less clear as they have shown disappointing results in outcome trials but may still be used in selected, high-risk patients with combined dyslipidemia. Bile acid sequestrants are now rarely used as there are stronger, better tolerable ways to lower LDL-cholesterol. With the introduction of new injectable lipid-lowering drugs, some oral drugs such as ezetimibe and bempedoic acid still have an important spot in our treatment algorithm others such as fibrates have a less clear role while again others are now rarely used., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To compare the impact of different statins therapies on the reduction of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) may reflect their cardiovascular benefits which is useful in clinical decision., Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched, and 3539 articles published from 1992 to 2020 were retrieved. CIMT in randomized controlled trials for statins therapies were included for traditional and network meta-analyses analyzed by Stata 16. The quality of included studies was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration's tool., Results: Thirty-three randomized controlled trials (n=8762) were eligible for network meta-analysis, of which 18 randomized controlled trials (n=5252) were included for comparison between statins and no statins and 11 randomized controlled trials (n=1338) were included for comparison between high-intensity statins or combination with niacin/ezetimibe and moderate/low-intensity statins in 2 traditional meta-analyses. In the traditional meta-analyses, the statins groups significantly reduce CIMT compared to no statins (standard mean difference=-0.207, 95% confidence interval: -0.291 to -0.123, p<0.001), while high-intensity statins or combination with niacin/ezetimibe performed significant CIMT reduction compared to moderate/low-intensity statins (standard mean difference=-0.287, 95% confidence interval: -0.460 to -0.114, p=0.001). In the network meta-analysis, a relative rank for the ability to reduce CIMT was given as follows: combination therapy with niacin (mean rank: 1.7), high-intensity statins, combination therapy with ezetimibe, and moderate/low-intensity statins., Conclusion: Statins combined with niacin performed a greater CIMT reduction compared to high-intensity statins alone and combination therapies with ezetimibe. The advantage of niacin-combined statins therapies to improve cardiovascular endpoint needs further validation through randomized controlled trials., Clinical Trial Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42020175972., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose of Review: The causal association of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) has been demonstrated in robust experimental, epidemiological, genetic, and interventional randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The goal of this review is to show how the knowledge acquired from statin RCTs influenced and was recommended on guidelines for prevention of ASCVD during the last three decades., Recent Findings: Guideline recommendations have evolved with accruing information derived mostly from statin RCTs, and as decades passed, more intensive LDL-C lowering was recommended according to a given ASCVD risk. Recent guidelines are unanimous in recommending intensive LDL-C lowering for the highest-risk individuals; however, they differ regarding risk stratification tools, use of specific LDL-C targets, management of primary prevention individuals, and thresholds to start non-statin lipid-lowering therapies. Even considering the advent of non-statin therapies like ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors, due to their efficacy, safety, and low cost, guidelines state that statins persist as the main component of ASCVD preventive strategies and should be prescribed in adequate doses to attain evidence-based LDL-C lowering.

Purpose of Review: Statins represent the cornerstone for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, although muscle-related side effects and dysregulation of glucose metabolism have strongly limited their adherence and compliance especially in primary prevention therapy. The purpose of the present review is to provide the most recent evidence of the efficacy and safety of statins in monotherapy or combination with new lipid-lowering drugs., Recent Findings: Recent "life-long" analysis conducted on young familial hypercholesterolemia patients, elderly hypocholesterolemic subjects, and from a 20-year follow-up of randomized controlled trial (RCT) have been published confirming that the cardiovascular benefits of statin therapy, in patients for whom it is recommended by current guidelines, greatly outweigh the risks of side effects. In addition, recent therapies to be used in combination with statins have shown to increase the percentage of patients at goal for low-density lipoprotein - cholesterol (LDL-C) with a good safety profile. The cardiovascular (CV) benefits of monoclonal antibodies anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and ezetimibe, in patients under statin therapy, have been proven by specific RCT, while we are still waiting for the results of bempedoic acid and the small-interfering RNA (si-RNA) anti-PCSK9 inclisiran. Taken together, the approval of new pharmacological agents to be used in combination with statins represents the future for a tailored therapy of cardiovascular disease patients.

Purpose of Review: The 2018 ACC/AHA Multisociety blood cholesterol guidelines provide updated recommendations based on contemporary evidence on the management of serum cholesterol for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. This review discusses clinically important topics in the new guidelines related to secondary ASCVD prevention., Recent Findings: Since the 2013 ACC/AHA blood cholesterol guidelines, several large randomized control trials involving ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors (evolocumab and alirocumab) have been published. The trials provided evidence that these non-statin, LDL-cholesterol lowering agents are efficacious in reducing risk for ASCVD events in patients with clinical ASCVD. The 2018 guidelines incorporate these new findings into updated clinical recommendations on therapeutic strategies related to the use of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors. The guidelines also recommend risk stratification of secondary prevention patients to identify those at very high-risk of ASCVD events as these patients would derive the most absolute risk reduction from the addition of non-statin therapies. While high-intensity statins remain the first-line treatment to prevent recurrent ASCVD events in secondary prevention patients, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors are evidence-based non-statin agents that can be used when residual on top of maximally tolerated statin therapy in patients deemed to be at very-high risk of recurrent ASCVD events.

Purpose of Review: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is caused by elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Although statins significantly reduce ASCVD risk, there remains a high degree of residual risk in statin-treated patients. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition has emerged as a significant therapeutic target for further lowering of LDL-C when used in combination with statins. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on recent evidence supporting the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with ASCVD., Recent Findings: Alirocumab and evolocumab were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2015. Multiple phase II and III studies have demonstrated that these agents reduce LDL-C levels by up to 60% and are relatively safe, with the exception of injection site reactions. Additionally, two randomized controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that both alirocumab and evolocumab reduce ASCVD events when used in combination with statin therapy compared to statin alone. In light of this evidence, the 2018 Cholesterol Guideline incorporated PCSK9 inhibitors into the treatment algorithm for select secondary prevention patients unable to achieve an LDL-C below 70 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin plus ezetimibe. Although PCSK9 inhibitors provide substantial reductions in LDL-C levels and reduce ASCVD events in secondary prevention populations, the cost-effectiveness of alirocumab and evolocumab limit widespread use. Additional research is needed to explore the role of PCSK9 inhibitors in other populations, including primary prevention, patients unable to tolerate statins, and acute myocardial infarction.

Purpose of Review: We provide an overview of our current understanding of combination lipid-lowering therapies intended for dyslipidemia treatment and cardiovascular disease prevention. First, we analyze recent statin and non-statin combination therapy guidelines and clinical studies since the publication of 2013 American College of Cardiology Cholesterol Guidelines. Second, we examine the clinical utility of non-statin agents alone and in combination in terms of LDL-C lowering and ASCVD risk reduction., Recent Findings: Medical societies, including the American College of Cardiology (ACC), National Lipid Association (NLA), and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), have released guidelines to address the appropriate use of non-statin therapies. The guidelines incorporated new evidence, including the IMPROVE-IT and FOURIER clinical trials, which demonstrate that the combination of statin therapy with other non-statin agents such as ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors has a significant clinical benefit. Increasing evidence that aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering leads to lower cardiovascular disease risk supports the need for continued exploration of the role of combination lipid-lowering therapies. A review of guidelines and clinical trials evaluating non-statin agents illuminates the growing base of evidence and expert opinion supporting the use of combination lipid-lowering therapies. While the majority of clinical trial data utilizes dyslipidemia monotherapy, especially statins, combination therapies represent an opportunity for individualized, patient-centered approach to LDL-C lowering and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk reduction. The overview provides a perspective on lipid management intended for clinicians who seek additional information and guidance on the use of combination therapies.

Purpose of Review: The 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol guidelines was a major paradigm shift in the management and treatment of dyslipidemia. The new guidelines outlined "statin benefit groups," highlighted weighing the benefit versus risks of statin therapy ("net benefit"), and discussed the importance of shared decision making between patients and providers in primary prevention. While there was widespread agreement on the main groups benefiting from statin therapy, there was significant controversy regarding LDL-C goals and thresholds, the role of non-statin therapy, and the use of statins in specific populations. The goal of this review is to understand the rationale for the updated 2016 ACC Expert Consensus on Non-Statins and to contrast it with the 2015 NLA Recommendations on the Management of Dyslipidemia., Recent Findings: The findings of the ACC Expert Consensus Panel were largely influenced by the results of several new clinical trials using non-statin therapy in combination with moderate to high intensity statin therapy. The IMPROVE-IT trial demonstrated that ezetimibe on top of statin therapy lowered ASCVD risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes whose LDL was driven below the previous LDL-C target of <70 mg/dL. In addition, preliminary data assessing the safety of evolocumab and alirocumab on top of statin therapy suggested possible large reductions in ASCVD risk in post hoc analysis. Both the 2016 ACC Consensus Recommendations and the 2015 NLA Recommendations emphasize the importance of maximally tolerated statin therapy, the use of adjunctive non-statin LDL lowering therapy, and the use of LDL-C goals and thresholds to guide intensification of LDL lowering therapy. Although there are some important differences between the ACC Consensus and NLA recommendations in terms of treatment of special populations (i.e., CHF) and on the use of non-HDL-C goals and thresholds, both guidelines support a role for ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrants, and PCSK-9 inhibitors in patients on maximum tolerated statin therapy. The recent positive results of the FOURIER trial gives additional support to the non-statin recommendations of both the ACC and NLA.

Bempedoic acid (ETC-1002), a novel therapeutic approach for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering, inhibits ATP citrate lyase (ACL), an enzyme involved in fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis. Although rodent studies suggested potential effects of ACL inhibition on both fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis, studies in humans show an effect only on cholesterol synthesis. In phase 2 studies, ETC-1002 reduced LDL-C as monotherapy, combined with ezetimibe, and added to statin therapy, with LDL-C lowering most pronounced when ETC-1002 was combined with ezetimibe in patients who cannot tolerate statins. Whether clinically relevant favorable effects on other cardiometabolic risk factors such as hyperglycemia and insulin resistance occur in humans is unknown and requires further investigation. Promising phase 2 results have led to the design of a large phase 3 program to gain more information on efficacy and safety of ETC-1002 in combination with statins and when added to ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients., Competing Interests: Ozlem Bilen declares no conflict of interest. Christie M. Ballantyne declares consultant fees, grants, and research support from Esperion, paid to her institution, during the conduct of the study; she also declares grants, research support, and/or consultant fees from Amarin, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Otsuka, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Takeda, National Institutes of Health, American Heart Association, and American Diabetes Association; she also declares consultant fees from AstraZeneca, Ionis, Genzyme, Matinas BioPharma, and Merck. Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite the success of treatment of CVD with statin therapy, a number of patients remain at high risk for CVD. Ezetimibe is a non-statin agent that inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption, leading to reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). A number of clinical studies evaluating the use of ezetimibe therapy have resulted in discordant data regarding its safety and efficacy. In this review, we discuss the findings from these studies as well as potential indications for the use of ezetimibe for LDL-C lowering and cardiovascular event reduction.

With the goal of decreasing low-density cholesterol (LDL-C) to mitigate risk of both primary and secondary cardiovascular outcomes, statins have been the cornerstone of therapy, significantly reducing the incidence of coronary atherosclerotic vascular disease. Previous studies suggest that adding other non-statin LDL-lowering agents may further lower LDL-C without negative side effects. Recent guidelines support the hypothesis that driving the LDL-C level below previously recommended targets may have a beneficial effect. Ezetimibe, a cholesterol absorption blocker that inhibits the Niemann-Pick C1-Like 1 (NPC1L1) receptor, has been the focus of recent trials that support its use in cardiovascular risk reduction. For patients not at goal on statin therapy alone, ezetimibe has proven to be a safe, well-tolerated medication that may be used as an adjunct to statin therapy to further reduce LDL-C, resulting in a significant mortality benefit.

Objective: Ezetimibe is used as a second-line lipid-lowering medication (LLM) if statin therapy is not tolerated or cholesterol targets are not reached by statins alone. We aimed to investigate the impact of sociodemographic factors on ezetimibe initiation as (a) incident LLM therapy, (b) add-on therapy, and (c) switch from statins., Methods: All individuals aged 30+ who had filled at least one prescription for either statins (N = 581.074) or ezetimibe (N = 7.932) in 2011 were followed in the nationwide Danish registries to explore LLM prescribing patterns from 1 January 2011 to end 2012. Using logistic regression analyses, the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated for (a) incident ezetimibe use among LLM initiators (N = 77,472), (b) ezetimibe switching by discontinuing statin users (N = 37,509), and (c) ezetimibe as add-on by non-discontinuing statin users (N = 442,672)., Results: Women had higher odds for initiating ezetimibe than men (switch OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.32-1.82). While prior use of newer high-potency statins was the strongest predictor (add-on (5.56; 4.95-6.24), income was the strongest socioeconomic predictor for incident LLM use (1.33; 1.14-1.56) and switching (1.64; 1.27-2.13). Both income and education were predictors for add-on therapy, with the educational effect mediated by prior use of high-potency statins. Odds for ezetimibe prescribing were highest in myocardial infarction patients., Conclusion: While higher income is a predictor for switching to ezetimibe, both higher education and income are weak predictors for using ezetimibe as add-on therapy. Women and individuals with myocardial infarction are more likely to be prescribed ezetimibe than others, despite lack of evidence of ezetimibe lowering the risk of cardiovascular events.