1. Association between tumor location and toxicity outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.
- Author
-
Wang B, Bukowski A, Kaidar-Person O, Choi JM, Sasaki-Adams DM, Jaikumar S, Higgins DM, Ewend MG, Sengupta S, Zagar TM, Yanagihara TK, Tepper JE, Marks LB, and Shen CJ
- Abstract
Purpose: Toxicities associated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are important when considering treatment and supportive management for patients with brain metastases. We herein assessed the association between brain metastasis location and risk of toxicity after SRS., Methods: We conducted a retrospective institutional review of patients treated with SRS for brain metastases between 2008 and 2023. Outcomes included radiation necrosis, seizure, local failure, and overall survival (OS)., Results: We reviewed 215 patients treated to 605 metastases (median diameter 10 mm, IQR 5-17 mm), in the frontal (34%), cerebellar (19%), parietal (16%), temporal (13%), and occipital (13%) regions. Median follow-up was 16 months (IQR 7-36). New-onset seizures developed in 11% (19/174) of patients without prior seizure and was higher in patients with motor or sensory cortex lesions (12/48, 25%) on multivariate analysis (MVA, P = 0.02). SRS-related grade ≥ 2 symptomatic radionecrosis occurred in 6% (33/605) of lesions and correlated with larger metastasis volume (P < 0.001) and renal cell carcinoma histology (P < 0.05), while supratentorial location was nearly significant (MVA, P = 0.06). Median OS across all patients was 16 months (95% CI 12-20). Patients with symptomatic radiation necrosis had a longer median survival compared to those who did not (43 vs. 14 months, P = 0.002), which remained significant alongside Karnofsky performance status and extracranial disease on MVA., Conclusion: Brain metastasis location in the motor or sensory cortex is associated with increased risk of new-onset seizure following SRS and may warrant consideration of steroid and/or anti-epileptic prophylaxis. Symptomatic radiation necrosis is uncommon in the cerebellum and may be increasing with improvements in survival., Competing Interests: Declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval This is a retrospective observational study. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required. Consent to participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent to publish The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF