Search

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of low-dose CT (LDCT) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for the surveillance of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) compared with standard-dose CT (SDCT) with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V)., Methods: The study enrolled 103 patients who underwent pancreatic CT for follow-up of incidentally detected PCLs. The CT protocol included LDCT in the pancreatic phase with 40% ASIR-V, DLIR at medium (DLIR-M) and high levels (DLIR-H), and SDCT in the portal-venous phase with 40% ASIR-V. The overall image quality and conspicuity of PCLs were qualitatively assessed using five-point scales by two radiologists. The size of PCLs, presence of thickened/enhancing walls, enhancing mural nodules, and main pancreatic duct dilatation were reviewed. CT noise and cyst-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were analyzed using the chi-squared test, one-way ANOVA, and t-test. Additionally, interobserver agreement was analyzed using the kappa and weighted-kappa statistics., Results: The volume CT dose-indexes in LDCT and SDCT were 3.0 ± 0.6 mGy and 8.4 ± 2.9 mGy, respectively. LDCT with DLIR-H showed the highest overall image quality, the lowest noise, and the highest CNR. The PCL conspicuity in LDCT with either DLIR-M or DLIR-H was not significantly different from that in SDCT with ASIR-V. Other findings depicting PCLs also revealed no significant differences between LDCT with DLIR and SDCT with ASIR-V. Moreover, the results revealed good or excellent interobserver agreement., Conclusion: LDCT with DLIR has a comparable performance with SDCT for the follow-up of incidentally detected PCLs., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Cystic pancreatic lesions (CPLs) are common and increasingly encountered in clinical radiology practice. The appropriate imaging surveillance strategy for lower-risk CPLs (branch duct-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and indeterminant small cystic lesions) has been a topic of intense study and debate in recent years. MRI is considered the investigation of choice for initial characterisation and follow-up of CPLs. Follow-up intervals for CPLs vary from 6 months to 2 years and surveillance may be lifelong or until the patient is no longer considered fit for potential surgical intervention. This creates a significant burden on MRI resources as a standard protocol pancreatic MRI may have an acquisition time of up to 35-50 min. However, the necessity of contrast-enhanced sequences and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for routine follow-up of CPLs has been questioned in recent years., Methods: We reviewed the available evidence to determine whether an abbreviated MRI (A-MRI) protocol may be safely adopted for surveillance of CPLs, as has been implemented in other clinical scenarios., Results: A number of recent retrospective studies have indicated that an A-MRI, omitting contrast-enhanced and DWI, may be used for CPL surveillance without any suspicious features or cases of malignancy being missed. Although small number of cases may need to be recalled for additional MR sequences based on the A-MRI findings, there is still a significant overall timesaving., Conclusion: The best available evidence currently suggests that an A-MRI protocol should be considered for routine surveillance of CPLs. Prospective studies are required to ensure the findings reported in these retrospective case studies are backed up in ongoing clinical practice.