Search

After the development of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), genetic testing of EGFR became required for effective treatment of lung cancer. Initially, the testing was conducted separately for each mutated region. However, many EGFR mutations have since been identified that determine the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs. Therefore, genetic testing of EGFR by next generation sequencing (NGS) may be a suitable strategy for lung cancer. Here we examined the applicability of the NGS method in regard to sensitivity, time and cost. A total of 939 specimens were obtained from 686 lung cancer patients at our hospital. DNA and RNA were simultaneously extracted from specimens derived from surgery, bronchoscopy, and fluid aspiration. Specimens included cerebrospinal fluid, pleural effusion, abdominal fluid, and pericardial effusion. From RNA, target regions (EGFR, KRAS, ALK fusion and RET fusion) were enriched by RT-PCR and sequenced with MiSeq. From DNA, PCR or PCR-RFLP conventional methods were performed. NGS and conventional methods were carried out routinely per week. Among the total 939 specimens, 38 specimens could not be examined with NGS. Among these, 34 specimens were analyzed by conventional testing with simultaneously extracted DNA. The remaining four specimens could not be tested with either method. Compared with the conventional method, the concordance rate of mutations was 99% (892/901), excluding specimens with NGS failure. The time period required from processing of specimens to results was 4 days, and the cost per sample was sufficiently low. In conclusion, the genetic testing with NGS method was useful for lung cancer treatment. The cost, sensitivity and time were able to tolerate routine examinations.

Genetic testing is needed for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC), especially molecular-targeted therapy. The effects of anti-EGFR therapy and prognosis are affected by the presence of KRAS mutations. However, whether primary CRC or metastatic tissues are appropriate in the analysis is still unclear. In the present study, we assessed the concordance of KRAS/BRAF mutation status and microsatellite instability (MSI) in primary CRC and corresponding metastases. This study enrolled 457 patients with surgically resected primary and corresponding metastatic CRC (499 synchronous metastases and 57 metachronous metastases) and seven local recurrences, and KRAS/BRAF mutation and MSI status were analysed for these tumours. The concordance rates of KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, wild-type, MSI-H and MSS between primary CRC and corresponding metastases were 93.9% (214/228), 100% (30/30), 99.3% (304/306), 87.5% (21/24) and 100% (137/137), respectively. These high concordance rates were not different between synchronous and metachronous metastases. In conclusion, a high concordance of KRAS/BRAF mutation status and MSI status was observed between primary CRC and corresponding metastases in this study. Either primary CRC or metastatic tissues can be used for testing KRAS/BRAF mutation status and MSI status.