1. Greenhouse gas mitigation economics for irrigated cropping systems in northeastern Colorado
- Author
-
Archer, David W. and Halvorson, Ardell D.
- Subjects
Global warming -- Economic aspects ,Global warming potential -- Economic aspects ,Greenhouse gases -- Economic aspects ,Air quality management -- Economic aspects ,No-tillage -- Economic aspects ,No-tillage -- Research ,Atmospheric carbon dioxide -- Economic aspects ,Atmospheric carbon dioxide -- Control ,Cropping systems -- Economic aspects ,Cropping systems -- Research ,Soils -- Carbon content ,Soils -- Research ,Soils -- Environmental aspects ,Earth sciences - Abstract
Recent soil and crop management technologies have potential for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions; however, these management strategies must be profitable if they are to be adopted by producers. The economic feasibility of reducing net greenhouse gas emissions in irrigated cropping systems was evaluated for 5 yr on a Fort Collins clay loam soil (a fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Aridic Haplustalf). Cropping systems included conventional tillage continuous corn (Zea mays L.) (CT-CC), no-till continuous corn (NT-CC), and no-till corn--bean (NTCB) including 1 yr soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and 1 yr dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The study included six N fertilization rates ranging from 0 to 246 kg [ha.sup.-1]. Results showed highest average net returns for NT-CB, exceeding net returns for NT-CC and CT-CC by US$182 and US$228 [ha.sup.-1], respectively at economically optimum N fertilizer rates. Net global warming potential (GWP) generally increased with increasing N fertilizer rate with the exception of NT-CC, where net GWP initially declined and then increased at higher N rates. Combining economic and net GWP measurements showed that producers have an economic incentive to switch from CT-CC to NT-CB, increasing annual average net returns by US$228 [ha.sup.-1] while reducing annual net GWP by 929 kg C[O.sub.2] equivalents [ha.sup.-1]. The greatest GWP reductions (1463 kg C[O.sub.2] equivalents [ha.sup.-1]) could be achieved by switching from CT-CC to NT-CC while also increasing net returns, but the presence of a more profitable NT-CB alternative means NT-CC is unlikely to be chosen without additional economic incentives. Abbreviations: CB, corn--bean rotation; CC, continuous corn; CT, conventional tillage; GHG, greenhouse gas; GHGI, greenhouse gas intensity; GWP, global warming potential; NT, no-till; SOC, soil organic carbon. doi:10.2136/sssaj2009.0080
- Published
- 2010