Search

Intrapatient heterogeneity of estrogen receptor (ER) expression on 16α-[ 18 F]fluoro-17β-estradiol ([ 18 F]FES) PET is related to outcome in patients with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but a validated and practical method to support clinical decision-making is lacking. Therefore, the [ 18 F]FES PET heterogeneity score (i.e., percentage of [ 18 F]FES-positive metastases) was validated as a prognostic factor for endocrine therapy response and survival in a large cohort of patients with newly diagnosed MBC. Furthermore, we explored 2 less laborious methods to predict the [ 18 F]FES PET heterogeneity score. Methods: Patients with ER-positive MBC included in the IMPACT-MBC study, who received baseline [ 18 F]FES and [ 18 F]FDG PET and first-line endocrine therapy, were included in this subanalysis. ER homogeneous (100% [ 18 F]FES-positive lesions) and ER heterogeneous (both [ 18 F]FES-positive and [ 18 F]FES-negative lesions) MBC was distinguished by manual segmentation of all lesions on [ 18 F]FES PET and related to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, the positive predictive value of the visual assessment and the 5-largest-lesions assessment to predict homogeneous MBC in all lesions on [ 18 F]FES PET was determined. Results: From the 102 MBC patients eligible for the present retrospective subanalysis, 46 had ER homogeneous MBC and 56 had ER heterogeneous MBC. Differences were found between ER homogeneous and ER heterogeneous MBC for median PFS (19.8 vs. 15.0 mo; hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.96; P = 0.03) and median OS (62.5 vs. 34.7 mo; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.38-1.08; P = 0.09). Twenty-one (38%) of 61 patients with ER homogeneous MBC by visual analysis and 37 (45%) of 83 patients with ER homogeneous MBC by the 5-largest-lesions method had ER heterogeneous MBC by manual segmentation of all lesions on [ 18 F]FES PET (positive predictive value, 0.66 and 0.55, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with ER-positive homogeneous MBC showed a trend toward superior PFS and OS compared with patients with ER heterogeneous MBC. This analysis confirmed and validated the prognostic value of the [ 18 F]FES PET heterogeneity score for endocrine therapy response and survival in a large cohort of MBC patients. The less laborious visual and 5-largest-lesions methods were inferior compared with assessment based on the [ 18 F]FES PET heterogeneity score in all lesions., (© 2025 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Understanding which patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative or -low metastatic breast cancer (MBC) benefit from HER2-targeted strategies is urgently needed. We assessed the whole-body heterogeneity of HER2 expression on 89 Zr-trastuzumab PET (HER2 PET) and the diagnostic performance of HER2 PET in a large series of patients, including HER2-negative and -low MBC. Methods: In the IMPACT-MBC study, patients with newly diagnosed and nonrapidly progressive MBC of all subtypes were included. Metastasis HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. 89 Zr-trastuzumab uptake was quantified as SUV max and SUV mean HER2 immunohistochemistry was related to the quantitative 89 Zr-trastuzumab uptake of all metastases and corresponding biopsied metastasis, uptake heterogeneity, and qualitative scan evaluation. A prediction algorithm for HER2 immunohistochemistry positivity based on uptake was developed. Results: In 200 patients, 89 Zr-trastuzumab uptake was quantified in 5,163 metastases, including 186 biopsied metastases. With increasing HER2 immunohistochemistry status, uptake was higher (geometric mean SUV max of 7.0, 7.6, 7.3, and 17.4 for a HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 0, 1, 2, or 3+, respectively; P < 0.001). High uptake exceeding 14.6 (90th percentile) was observed in one third of patients with a HER2-negative or -low metastasis biopsy. The algorithm performed best when lesion site and size were incorporated (area under the curve, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.93). Conclusion: HER2 PET had good diagnostic performance in MBC, showing considerable whole-body HER2 heterogeneity and uptake above background in HER2-negative and -low MBC. This provides novel insights into HER2-negative and -low MBC compared with standard HER2 immunohistochemistry on a single biopsy., (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)