Search

The purpose of this study was to establish the dose-response relationship of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), when informed by radiobiological sensitivity parameters derived from mCRC cell lines exposed to 90 Y. Methods: Twenty-three mCRC patients with liver metastases refractory to chemotherapy were included. 90 Y bremsstrahlung SPECT images were transformed into dose maps assuming the local dose deposition method. Baseline and follow-up CT scans were segmented to derive liver and tumor volumes. Mean, median, and D 70 (minimum dose to 70% of tumor volume) values determined from dose maps were correlated with change in tumor volume and volumetric RECIST response using linear and logistic regression, respectively. Radiosensitivity parameters determined by clonogenic assays of mCRC cell lines HT-29 and DLD-1 after exposure to 90 Y or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; 6 MV photons) were used in biologically effective dose (BED) calculations. Results: Mean administered radioactivity was 1,469 ± 428 MBq (range, 847-2,185 MBq), achieving a mean absorbed radiation dose to tumor of 35.5 ± 9.4 Gy and mean normal liver dose of 26.4 ± 6.8 Gy. A 1.0 Gy increase in mean, median, and D 70 absorbed dose was associated with a reduction in tumor volume of 1.8%, 1.8%, and 1.5%, respectively, and an increased probability of a volumetric RECIST response (odds ratio, 1.09, 1.09, and 1.10, respectively). Threshold mean, median and D 70 doses for response were 48.3, 48.8, and 41.8 Gy, respectively. EBRT-equivalent BEDs for 90 Y are up to 50% smaller than those calculated by applying protraction-corrected radiobiological parameters derived from EBRT alone. Conclusion: Dosimetric studies have assumed equivalence between 90 Y SIRT and EBRT, leading to inflation of BED for SIRT and possible undertreatment. Radiobiological parameters for 90 Y were applied to a BED model, providing a calculation method that has the potential to improve assessment of tumor control., (© 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

A data-driven method for respiratory gating in PET has recently been commercially developed. We sought to compare the performance of the algorithm with an external, device-based system for oncologic 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging. Methods: In total, 144 whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/CT examinations were acquired, with a respiratory gating waveform recorded by an external, device-based respiratory gating system. In each examination, 2 of the bed positions covering the liver and lung bases were acquired with a duration of 6 min. Quiescent-period gating retaining approximately 50% of coincidences was then able to produce images with an effective duration of 3 min for these 2 bed positions, matching the other bed positions. For each examination, 4 reconstructions were performed and compared: data-driven gating (DDG) (we use the term DDG-retro to distinguish that we did not use the real-time R-threshold-based application of DDG that is available within the manufacturer's product), external device-based gating (real-time position management (RPM)-gated), no gating but using only the first 3 min of data (ungated-matched), and no gating retaining all coincidences (ungated-full). Lesions in the images were quantified and image quality scored by a radiologist who was masked to the method of data processing. Results: Compared with the other reconstruction options, DDG-retro increased the SUV max and decreased the threshold-defined lesion volume. Compared with RPM-gated, DDG-retro gave an average increase in SUV max of 0.66 ± 0.1 g/mL ( n = 87, P < 0.0005). Although the results from the masked image evaluation were most commonly equivalent, DDG-retro was preferred over RPM-gated in 13% of examinations, whereas the opposite occurred in just 2% of examinations. This was a significant preference for DDG-retro ( P = 0.008, n = 121). Liver lesions were identified in 23 examinations. Considering this subset of data, DDG-retro was ranked superior to ungated-full in 6 of 23 (26%) cases. Gated reconstruction using the external device failed in 16% of examinations, whereas DDG-retro always provided a clinically acceptable image. Conclusion: In this clinical evaluation, DDG-retro provided performance superior to that of the external device-based system. For most examinations the performance was equivalent, but DDG-retro had superior performance in 13% of examinations, leading to a significant preference overall., (© 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Imaging on a γ-camera with 90 Y after selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) may allow for verification of treatment delivery but suffers relatively poor spatial resolution and imprecise dosimetry calculation. 90 Y PET/CT imaging is possible on 3-dimensional, time-of-flight machines; however, images are usually poor because of low count statistics and noise. A new PET reconstruction software using a Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm (termed Q.Clear) was investigated using phantom and patient scans to optimize the reconstruction for post-SIRT imaging and clarify whether BPL leads to an improvement in clinical image quality using 90 Y. Methods: Phantom studies over an activity range of 0.5-4.2 GBq were performed to assess the contrast recovery, background variability, and contrast-to-noise ratio for a range of BPL and ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstructions on a PET/CT scanner. Patient images after SIRT were reconstructed using the same parameters and were scored and ranked on the basis of image quality, as assessed by visual evaluation, with the corresponding SPECT/CT Bremsstrahlung images by 2 experienced radiologists. Results: Contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly better in BPL reconstructions when compared with OSEM in phantom studies. The patient-derived BPL and matching Bremsstrahlung images scored higher than OSEM reconstructions when scored by radiologists. BPL with a β value of 4,000 was ranked the highest of all images. Deadtime was apparent in the system above a total phantom activity of 3.3 GBq. Conclusion: BPL with a β value of 4,000 is the optimal image reconstruction in PET/CT for confident radiologic reading when compared with other reconstruction parameters for 90 Y imaging after SIRT imaging. Activity in the field of view should be below 3.3 GBq at the time of PET imaging to avoid deadtime losses for this scanner., (© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)