1. Prospective comparison of 3 gamma-probes for sentinel lymph node detection in 200 breast cancer patients.
- Author
-
Classe JM, Fiche M, Rousseau C, Sagan C, Dravet F, Pioud R, Lisbona A, Ferrer L, Campion L, Resche I, and Curtet C
- Subjects
- Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Female, Humans, Lymphatic Metastasis, Middle Aged, Radionuclide Imaging instrumentation, Radionuclide Imaging methods, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy methods, Surgery, Computer-Assisted methods, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Gamma Cameras, Lymph Nodes diagnostic imaging, Lymph Nodes pathology, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy instrumentation, Surgery, Computer-Assisted instrumentation
- Abstract
Unlabelled: Previous reports have shown that axillary sentinel lymph node (ASLN) radiodetection allows accurate axillary staging for patients with early breast cancer. Radioguided surgery implies the use of a gamma-probe to count the emitted radioactivity of marked ASLNs. Several gamma-probes are commercially available, each with its own properties. The clinical impact of the type of gamma-probe used for ASLN radiodetection remains to be evaluated., Methods: Three commercially available gamma-probes were evaluated: a scintillator with a bismuth germanate crystal (probe A), a semiconductor with a cadmium telluride crystal (probe B), and a semiconductor with a cadmium zinc telluride crystal (probe C). Two hundred patients with early breast cancer were prospectively enrolled to undergo ASLN radiodetection and axillary lymphadenectomy. ASLN mapping consisted of injecting (99m)Tc-sulfur-colloid around the tumor. For each patient, sentinel lymph nodes were counted successively with the 3 probes and the sensitivity of each gamma-probe was determined from ASLN residual activity. The results of detection rates and false-negative rates for each probe were compared., Results: Mean residual ASLN activity was 52 kBq (range, 0.07-189 kBq). Sensitivity was compared among the 3 probes and found to be best for probe A. The detection rate of probe A was significantly better than that of probe B (93% vs. 86%, P = 0.05) but not different from that of probe C (93% vs. 90%). No differences in false-negative rates were observed among the 3 probes., Conclusion: ASLN detection rate depends on the type of gamma-probe used. Because failure to detect the ASLN leads to complete axillary lymphadenectomy, involving local morbidity and other sequelae, the type of gamma-probe must be considered important for sentinel lymph node radiodetection.
- Published
- 2005