Search

In lung cancer patients, radiotherapy is associated with a increased risk of local relapse (LR) when compared with surgery but with a preferable toxicity profile. The KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutational status (Mut KEAP1/NFE2L2 ) is significantly correlated with LR in patients treated with radiotherapy but is rarely available. Prediction of Mut KEAP1/NFE2L2 with noninvasive modalities could help to further personalize each therapeutic strategy. Methods: Based on a public cohort of 770 patients, model RNA (M-RNA) was first developed using continuous gene expression levels to predict Mut KEAP1/NFE2L2 , resulting in a binary output. The model PET/CT (M-PET/CT) was then built to predict M-RNA binary output using PET/CT-extracted radiomics features. M-PET/CT was validated on an external cohort of 151 patients treated with curative volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy. Each model was built, internally validated, and evaluated on a separate cohort using a multilayer perceptron network approach. Results: The M-RNA resulted in a C statistic of 0.82 in the testing cohort. With a training cohort of 101 patients, the retained M-PET/CT resulted in an area under the curve of 0.90 ( P < 0.001). With a probability threshold of 20% applied to the testing cohort, M-PET/CT achieved a C statistic of 0.7. The same radiomics model was validated on the volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy cohort as patients were significantly stratified on the basis of their risk of LR with a hazard ratio of 2.61 ( P = 0.02). Conclusion: Our approach enables the prediction of Mut KEAP1/NFE2L2 using PET/CT-extracted radiomics features and efficiently classifies patients at risk of LR in an external cohort treated with radiotherapy., (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Trustworthiness is a core tenet of medicine. The patient-physician relationship is evolving from a dyad to a broader ecosystem of health care. With the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, the elements of trust must be revisited. We envision a road map for the establishment of trustworthy AI ecosystems in nuclear medicine. In this report, AI is contextualized in the history of technologic revolutions. Opportunities for AI applications in nuclear medicine related to diagnosis, therapy, and workflow efficiency, as well as emerging challenges and critical responsibilities, are discussed. Establishing and maintaining leadership in AI require a concerted effort to promote the rational and safe deployment of this innovative technology by engaging patients, nuclear medicine physicians, scientists, technologists, and referring providers, among other stakeholders, while protecting our patients and society. This strategic plan was prepared by the AI task force of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

An important need exists for strategies to perform rigorous objective clinical-task-based evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for nuclear medicine. To address this need, we propose a 4-class framework to evaluate AI algorithms for promise, technical task-specific efficacy, clinical decision making, and postdeployment efficacy. We provide best practices to evaluate AI algorithms for each of these classes. Each class of evaluation yields a claim that provides a descriptive performance of the AI algorithm. Key best practices are tabulated as the RELAINCE (Recommendations for EvaLuation of AI for NuClear medicinE) guidelines. The report was prepared by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging AI Task Force Evaluation team, which consisted of nuclear-medicine physicians, physicists, computational imaging scientists, and representatives from industry and regulatory agencies., (© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Conventional MRI plays a key role in the management of patients with high-grade glioma, but multiparametric MRI and PET tracers could provide further information to better characterize tumor metabolism and heterogeneity by identifying regions having a high risk of recurrence. In this study, we focused on proliferation, hypervascularization, and hypoxia, all factors considered indicative of poor prognosis. They were assessed by measuring uptake of 18 F-3'-deoxy-3'- 18 F-fluorothymidine ( 18 F-FLT), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) maps, and uptake of 18 F-fluoromisonidazole ( 18 F-FMISO), respectively. For each modality, the volumes and high-uptake subvolumes (hot spots) were semiautomatically segmented and compared with the contrast enhancement (CE) volume on T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced (T1w-Gd) images, commonly used in the management of patients with glioblastoma. Methods: Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI (31 patients), 18 F-FLT PET (20 patients), or 18 F-FMISO PET (20 patients), for a total of 31 patients, was performed on preoperative glioblastoma patients. Volumes and hot spots were segmented on SUV maps for 18 F-FLT PET (using the fuzzy locally adaptive bayesian algorithm) and 18 F-FMISO PET (using a mean contralateral image + 3.3 SDs) and on rCBV maps (using a mean contralateral image + 1.96 SDs) for dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI and overlaid on T1w-Gd images. For each modality, the percentages of the peripheral volumes and the peripheral hot spots outside the CE volume were calculated. Results: All tumors showed highly proliferated, hypervascularized, and hypoxic regions. The images also showed pronounced heterogeneity of both tracers regarding their uptake and rCBV maps, within each individual patient. Overlaid volumes on T1w-Gd images showed that some proliferative, hypervascularized, and hypoxic regions extended beyond the CE volume but with marked differences between patients. The ranges of peripheral volume outside the CE volume were 1.6%-155.5%, 1.5%-89.5%, and 3.1%-78.0% for 18 F-FLT, rCBV, and 18 F-FMISO, respectively. All patients had hyperproliferative hot spots outside the CE volume, whereas hypervascularized and hypoxic hot spots were detected mainly within the enhancing region. Conclusion: Spatial analysis of multiparametric maps with segmented volumes and hot spots provides valuable information to optimize the management and treatment of patients with glioblastoma., (© 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

The current pandemic has created a situation where nuclear medicine practitioners and medical physicists read or process nuclear medicine images remotely from their home office. This article presents recommendations on the components and specifications when setting up a remote viewing station for nuclear medicine imaging., (© 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

The aim of this retrospective multicentric study was to develop and evaluate a prognostic 18 F-FDG PET/CT radiomic signature in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods: Patients from 3 different centers ( n = 27, 29, and 8) were pooled to constitute the training set, whereas the patients from a fourth center ( n = 23) were used as the testing set. The primary endpoint was local control. The primary tumor was semiautomatically delineated in the PET images using the fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian algorithm, and manually in the low-dose CT images. In total, 184 Image Biomarkers Standardization Initiative-compliant radiomic features were extracted. Seven clinical and treatment parameters were included. We used ComBat to harmonize radiomic features extracted from the 4 institutions relying on different PET/CT scanners. In the training set, variables found significant in the univariate analysis were fed into a multivariate regression model, and models were built by combining independent prognostic factors. Results: Median follow-up was 21.1 mo (range, 1.7-63.4 mo) and 25.5 mo (range, 7.7-57.8 mo) in training and testing sets, respectively. In univariate analysis, none of the clinical variables, 2 PET features, and 2 CT features were significantly predictive of local control. The best predictive models in the training set were obtained by combining one feature from PET (Information Correlation 2) and one feature from CT (flatness), reaching a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96%. Another model combining 2 PET features (Information Correlation 2 and strength) reached sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 88%, both with an undefined hazard ratio ( P < 0.001). The latter model obtained an accuracy of 0.91 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 81%), with a hazard ratio undefined ( P = 0.023) in the testing set; however, other models relying on CT radiomic features only or the combination of PET and CT features failed to validate in the testing set. Conclusion: We showed that 2 radiomic features derived from 18 F-FDG PET were independently associated with local control in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing SBRT and could be combined in an accurate predictive model. This model could provide local relapse-related information and could be helpful in clinical decision making., (© 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

The aim of this review is to provide readers with an update on the state of the art, pitfalls, solutions for those pitfalls, future perspectives, and challenges in the quickly evolving field of radiomics in nuclear medicine imaging and associated oncology applications. The main pitfalls were identified in study design, data acquisition, segmentation, feature calculation, and modeling; however, in most cases, potential solutions are available and existing recommendations should be followed to improve the overall quality and reproducibility of published radiomics studies. The techniques from the field of deep learning have some potential to provide solutions, especially in terms of automation. Some important challenges remain to be addressed but, overall, striking advances have been made in the field in the last 5 y., (© 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

The main purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of shape and heterogeneity features in both the PET and the low-dose CT components of PET/CT. A secondary objective was to investigate the impact of image quantization. Methods: A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant secondary analysis of deidentified prospectively acquired PET/CT test-retest datasets of 74 patients from multicenter Merck and American College of Radiology Imaging Network trials was performed. Metabolically active volumes were automatically delineated on PET with a fuzzy locally adaptive bayesian algorithm. Software was used to semiautomatically delineate the anatomic volumes on the low-dose CT component. Two quantization methods were considered: a quantization into a set number of bins (quantization B) and an alternative quantization with bins of fixed width (quantization W). Four shape descriptors, 10 first-order metrics, and 26 textural features were evaluated. Bland-Altman analysis was used to quantify repeatability. Features were subsequently categorized as very reliable, reliable, moderately reliable, or poorly reliable with respect to the corresponding volume variability. Results: Repeatability was highly variable among features. Numerous metrics were identified as poorly or moderately reliable. Others were reliable or very reliable in both modalities and in all categories (shape and first-, second-, and third-order metrics). Image quantization played a major role in feature repeatability. Features were more reliable in PET with quantization B, whereas quantization W showed better results in CT. Conclusion: The test-retest repeatability of shape and heterogeneity features in PET and low-dose CT varied greatly among metrics. The level of repeatability also depended strongly on the quantization step, with different optimal choices for each modality. The repeatability of PET and low-dose CT features should be carefully considered when selecting metrics to build multiparametric models., (© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Unlabelled: (18)F-FDG PET is well established in the field of oncology for diagnosis and staging purposes and is increasingly being used to assess therapeutic response and prognosis. Many quantitative indices can be used to characterize tumors on (18)F-FDG PET images, such as SUVmax, metabolically active tumor volume (MATV), total lesion glycolysis, and, more recently, the proposed intratumor uptake heterogeneity features. Although most PET data considered within this context concern the analysis of activity distribution using images obtained from a single static acquisition, parametric images generated from dynamic acquisitions and reflecting radiotracer kinetics may provide additional information. The purpose of this study was to quantify differences between volumetry, uptake, and heterogeneity features extracted from static and parametric PET images of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) in order to provide insight on the potential added value of parametric images., Methods: Dynamic (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed on 20 therapy-naive NSCLC patients for whom primary surgical resection was planned. Both static and parametric PET images were analyzed, with quantitative parameters (MATV, SUVmax, SUVmean, heterogeneity) being extracted from the segmented tumors. Differences were investigated using Spearman rank correlation and Bland-Altman analysis., Results: MATV was slightly smaller on static images (-2% ± 7%), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.14). All derived parameters, including those characterizing tumor functional heterogeneity, correlated strongly between static and parametric images (r = 0.70-0.98, P ≤ 0.0006), exhibiting differences of less than ±25%., Conclusion: In NSCLC primary tumors, parametric and static baseline (18)F-FDG PET images provided strongly correlated quantitative features for both standard (MATV, SUVmax, SUVmean) and heterogeneity quantification. Consequently, heterogeneity quantification on parametric images does not seem to provide significant complementary information compared with static SUV images., (© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.)

Unlabelled: This study investigated whether (18)F-FDG PET/CT performed at baseline and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was able to early depict estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer patients with poor clinical outcome., Methods: The NAC regimen consisted of 4 cycles of epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide, followed by 4 courses of docetaxel. The patients underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT at baseline and after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. After completion of NAC, all patients had breast surgery with axillary lymph node dissection. We assessed the impact of 2 PET parameters, maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and total lesion glycolysis, on event-free survival (EFS)., Results: Ninety-eight consecutive patients with clinical stage II or III ER+/HER2- breast cancer were included. (18)F-FDG PET/CT revealed distant metastases in 14 patients (14%). Overall survival was significantly shorter in these patients than in the 84 patients classified as M0 at baseline (18)F-FDG PET/CT (P < 0.001). In M0 patients, a high SUVmax at baseline was associated with shorter EFS (P < 0.001). Twelve patients had a tumor SUVmax of 10 or greater and a 3-y EFS of 49% (vs. 92% in patients with baseline SUVmax < 10). A low change in SUVmax between (18)F-FDG PET/CT examination before starting NAC and after the second cycle of chemotherapy was also associated with recurrence (P = 0.033), as was a low change in total lesion glycolysis (P < 0.001). Contrarily to PET-based prediction, the extent of pathologic response after completion of NAC (partial/complete vs. nonresponders) was poorly correlated to the risk of relapse., Conclusion: Baseline tumor (18)F-FDG uptake and modifications after 2 cycles of NAC are prognostic of outcome in patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer., (© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.)

Unlabelled: Intratumoral uptake heterogeneity in (18)F-FDG PET has been associated with patient treatment outcomes in several cancer types. Textural feature analysis is a promising method for its quantification. An open issue associated with textural features for the quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity concerns its added contribution and dependence on the metabolically active tumor volume (MATV), which has already been shown to be a significant predictive and prognostic parameter. Our objective was to address this question using a larger cohort of patients covering different cancer types., Methods: A single database of 555 pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET images (breast, cervix, esophageal, head and neck, and lung cancer tumors) was assembled. Four robust and reproducible textural feature-derived parameters were considered. The issues associated with the calculation of textural features using co-occurrence matrices (such as the quantization and spatial directionality relationships) were also investigated. The relationship between these features and MATV, as well as among the features themselves, was investigated using Spearman rank coefficients for different volume ranges. The complementary prognostic value of MATV and textural features was assessed through multivariate Cox analysis in the esophageal and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohorts., Results: A large range of MATVs was included in the population considered (3-415 cm(3); mean, 35; median, 19; SD, 50). The correlation between MATV and textural features varied greatly depending on the MATVs, with reduced correlation for increasing volumes. These findings were reproducible across the different cancer types. The quantization and calculation methods both had an impact on the correlation. Volume and heterogeneity were independent prognostic factors (P = 0.0053 and 0.0093, respectively) along with stage (P = 0.002) in non-small cell lung cancer, but in the esophageal tumors, volume and heterogeneity had less complementary value because of smaller overall volumes., Conclusion: Our results suggest that heterogeneity quantification and volume may provide valuable complementary information for volumes above 10 cm(3), although the complementary information increases substantially with larger volumes., (© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.)

Unlabelled: The goal of this study was to compare visual assessment of intratumor (18)F-FDG PET uptake distribution with a textural-features (TF) automated quantification and to establish their respective prognostic value in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: The study retrospectively included 102 consecutive patients. Only primary tumors were considered. Intratumor heterogeneity was visually scored (3-level scale [Hvisu]) by 2 nuclear medicine physicians. Tumor volumes were automatically delineated, and heterogeneity was quantified with TF. Mean and maximum standardized uptake value were also included. Visual interobserver agreement and correlations with quantitative assessment were evaluated using the κ test and Spearman rank (ρ) coefficient, respectively. Association with overall survival and recurrence-free survival was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models., Results: Moderate correlations (0.4 < ρ < 0.6) between TF parameters and Hvisu were observed. Interobserver agreement for Hvisu was moderate (κ = 0.64, discrepancies in 27% of the cases). High standardized uptake value, large metabolic volumes, and high heterogeneity according to TF were associated with poorer overall survival and recurrence-free survival and remained an independent prognostic factor of overall survival with respect to clinical variables., Conclusion: Quantification of (18)F-FDG uptake heterogeneity in NSCLC through TF was correlated with visual assessment by experts. However, TF also constitutes an objective heterogeneity quantification, with reduced interobserver variability, and independent prognostic value potentially useful for patient stratification and management., (© 2014 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.)

Unlabelled: The goal of this study was to determine the best predictive factor among image-derived parameters extracted from sequential (18)F-FDG PET scans for early tumor response prediction after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer., Methods: 51 breast cancer patients were included. Responder and nonresponder status was determined by histopathologic examination according to the tumor and node Sataloff scale. PET indices (maximum and mean standardized uptake value [SUV], metabolically active tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis [TLG]), at baseline and their variation (Δ) after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were extracted from the PET images. Their predictive value was investigated using Mann-Whitney U tests and receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. Subgroup analysis was also performed by considering estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, triple-negative, and HER2-positive tumors separately. The impact of partial-volume correction was also investigated using an iterative deconvolution algorithm., Results: There were 24 pathologic nonresponders and 27 responders. None of the baseline PET parameters was correlated with response. After 2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles, the reduction of each parameter was significantly associated with response, the best prediction of response being obtained with ΔTLG (96% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 94% accuracy), which had a significantly higher area under the curve (0.91 vs. 0.82, P = 0.01) than did ΔSUVmax (63% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 77% accuracy). Subgroup analysis confirmed a significantly higher accuracy for ΔTLG than ΔSUV for ER-positive/HER-negative but not for triple-negative and HER2-positive tumors. Partial-volume correction had no impact on the predictive value of any of the PET image-derived parameters despite significant changes in their absolute values., Conclusion: Our results suggest that the reduction after 2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles of the metabolically active volume of primary tumor measurements such as ΔTLG predicts histopathologic tumor response with higher accuracy than does ΔSUV measurements, especially for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. These results should be confirmed in a larger group of patients as they may potentially increase the clinical value and efficiency of (18)F-FDG PET for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Unlabelled: (18)F-FDG PET measurement of standardized uptake value (SUV) is increasingly used for monitoring therapy response and predicting outcome. Alternative parameters computed through textural analysis were recently proposed to quantify the heterogeneity of tracer uptake by tumors as a significant predictor of response. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of these heterogeneity measurements., Methods: Double baseline (18)F-FDG PET scans were acquired within 4 d of each other for 16 patients before any treatment was considered. A Bland-Altman analysis was performed on 8 parameters based on histogram measurements and 17 parameters based on textural heterogeneity features after discretization with values between 8 and 128., Results: The reproducibility of maximum and mean SUV was similar to that in previously reported studies, with a mean percentage difference of 4.7% ± 19.5% and 5.5% ± 21.2%, respectively. By comparison, better reproducibility was measured for some textural features describing local heterogeneity of tracer uptake, such as entropy and homogeneity, with a mean percentage difference of -2% ± 5.4% and 1.8% ± 11.5%, respectively. Several regional heterogeneity parameters such as variability in the intensity and size of regions of homogeneous activity distribution had reproducibility similar to that of SUV measurements, with 95% confidence intervals of -22.5% to 3.1% and -1.1% to 23.5%, respectively. These parameters were largely insensitive to the discretization range., Conclusion: Several parameters derived from textural analysis describing heterogeneity of tracer uptake by tumors on local and regional scales had reproducibility similar to or better than that of simple SUV measurements. These reproducibility results suggest that these (18)F-FDG PET-derived parameters, which have already been shown to have predictive and prognostic value in certain cancer models, may be used to monitor therapy response and predict patient outcome.

Unlabelled: The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of partial-volume effect (PVE) correction on the predictive and prognostic value of metabolically active tumor volume (MATV) measurements on (18)F-FDG PET baseline scans for therapy response and overall survival in esophageal cancer patients., Methods: Fifty patients with esophageal cancer treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy between 2004 and 2008 were retrospectively considered. PET baseline scans were corrected for PVE with iterative deconvolution incorporating wavelet denoising. MATV delineation on both original and corrected images was performed using the automatic fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian methodology. Several parameters were extracted considering the original and corrected images: maximum and peak standardized uptake value (SUV), mean SUV, MATV, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) (TLG = MATV × mean SUV). The predictive value of each parameter with or without correction was investigated using Kruskal-Wallis tests, and the prognostic value was determined with Kaplan-Meier curves., Results: Whereas PVE correction had a significant quantitative impact on the absolute values of the investigated parameters, their clinical value within the clinical context of interest was not significantly modified-a result that was observed for both overall survival and response to therapy. The hierarchy between parameters was the same before and after correction. SUV measurements (maximum, peak, and mean) had nonsignificant (P > 0.05) predictive or prognostic value, whereas functional tumor-related measurements (MATV and TLG) were significant (P < 0.002) predictors of response and independent prognostic factors., Conclusion: PVE correction does not improve the predictive and prognostic value of baseline PET image-derived parameters in esophageal cancer patients.

Unlabelled: The objectives of this study were to investigate the relationship between CT- and (18)F-FDG PET-based tumor volumes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the impact of tumor size and uptake heterogeneity on various approaches to delineating uptake on PET images., Methods: Twenty-five NSCLC cancer patients with (18)F-FDG PET/CT were considered. Seventeen underwent surgical resection of their tumor, and the maximum diameter was measured. Two observers manually delineated the tumors on the CT images and the tumor uptake on the corresponding PET images, using a fixed threshold at 50% of the maximum (T(50)), an adaptive threshold methodology, and the fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian (FLAB) algorithm. Maximum diameters of the delineated volumes were compared with the histopathology reference when available. The volumes of the tumors were compared, and correlations between the anatomic volume and PET uptake heterogeneity and the differences between delineations were investigated., Results: All maximum diameters measured on PET and CT images significantly correlated with the histopathology reference (r > 0.89, P < 0.0001). Significant differences were observed among the approaches: CT delineation resulted in large overestimation (+32% ± 37%), whereas all delineations on PET images resulted in underestimation (from -15% ± 17% for T(50) to -4% ± 8% for FLAB) except manual delineation (+8% ± 17%). Overall, CT volumes were significantly larger than PET volumes (55 ± 74 cm(3) for CT vs. from 18 ± 25 to 47 ± 76 cm(3) for PET). A significant correlation was found between anatomic tumor size and heterogeneity (larger lesions were more heterogeneous). Finally, the more heterogeneous the tumor uptake, the larger was the underestimation of PET volumes by threshold-based techniques., Conclusion: Volumes based on CT images were larger than those based on PET images. Tumor size and tracer uptake heterogeneity have an impact on threshold-based methods, which should not be used for the delineation of cases of large heterogeneous NSCLC, as these methods tend to largely underestimate the spatial extent of the functional tumor in such cases. For an accurate delineation of PET volumes in NSCLC, advanced image segmentation algorithms able to deal with tracer uptake heterogeneity should be preferred.

Unlabelled: (18)F-FDG PET is often used in clinical routine for diagnosis, staging, and response to therapy assessment or prediction. The standardized uptake value (SUV) in the primary or regional area is the most common quantitative measurement derived from PET images used for those purposes. The aim of this study was to propose and evaluate new parameters obtained by textural analysis of baseline PET scans for the prediction of therapy response in esophageal cancer., Methods: Forty-one patients with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer treated with combined radiochemotherapy were included in this study. All patients underwent pretreatment whole-body (18)F-FDG PET. Patients were treated with radiotherapy and alkylatinlike agents (5-fluorouracil-cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil-carboplatin). Patients were classified as nonresponders (progressive or stable disease), partial responders, or complete responders according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Different image-derived indices obtained from the pretreatment PET tumor images were considered. These included usual indices such as maximum SUV, peak SUV, and mean SUV and a total of 38 features (such as entropy, size, and magnitude of local and global heterogeneous and homogeneous tumor regions) extracted from the 5 different textures considered. The capacity of each parameter to classify patients with respect to response to therapy was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (P < 0.05). Specificity and sensitivity (including 95% confidence intervals) for each of the studied parameters were derived using receiver-operating-characteristic curves., Results: Relationships between pairs of voxels, characterizing local tumor metabolic nonuniformities, were able to significantly differentiate all 3 patient groups (P < 0.0006). Regional measures of tumor characteristics, such as size of nonuniform metabolic regions and corresponding intensity nonuniformities within these regions, were also significant factors for prediction of response to therapy (P = 0.0002). Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis showed that tumor textural analysis can provide nonresponder, partial-responder, and complete-responder patient identification with higher sensitivity (76%-92%) than any SUV measurement., Conclusion: Textural features of tumor metabolic distribution extracted from baseline (18)F-FDG PET images allow for the best stratification of esophageal carcinoma patients in the context of therapy-response prediction.

Unlabelled: The objective of this study was to establish the repeatability and reproducibility limits of several volume-related PET image-derived indices-namely tumor volume (TV), mean standardized uptake value, total glycolytic volume (TGV), and total proliferative volume (TPV)-relative to those of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), commonly used in clinical practice., Methods: Fixed and adaptive thresholding, fuzzy C-means, and fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian methodology were considered for TV delineation. Double-baseline (18)F-FDG (17 lesions, 14 esophageal cancer patients) and 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) (12 lesions, 9 breast cancer patients) PET scans, acquired at a mean interval of 4 d and before any treatment, were used for reproducibility evaluation. The repeatability of each method was evaluated for the same datasets and compared with manual delineation., Results: A negligible variability of less than 5% was measured for all segmentation approaches in comparison to manual delineation (5%-35%). SUV(max) reproducibility levels were similar to others previously reported, with a mean percentage difference of 1.8% +/- 16.7% and -0.9% +/- 14.9% for the (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT lesions, respectively. The best TV, TGV, and TPV reproducibility limits ranged from -21% to 31% and -30% to 37% for (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT images, respectively, whereas the worst reproducibility limits ranged from -90% to 73% and -68% to 52%, respectively., Conclusion: The reproducibility of estimating TV, mean standardized uptake value, and derived TGV and TPV was found to vary among segmentation algorithms. Some differences between (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT scans were observed, mainly because of differences in overall image quality. The smaller reproducibility limits for volume-derived image indices were similar to those for SUV(max), suggesting that the use of appropriate delineation tools should allow the determination of tumor functional volumes in PET images in a repeatable and reproducible fashion.