Search

Aims: Reducing elevated left atrial pressure with an atrial septum shunt device is a possible treatment option in symptomatic heart failure patients. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of the Atrial Flow Regulator (AFR) in heart failure patients., Methods and Results: AFR-PRELIEVE is a prospective, non-randomised, open-label, multicentre study in patients with symptomatic heart failure NYHA Class III or IV and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥15 mmHg at rest or ≥25 mmHg at exercise irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF ≥15%). Here we report on procedural and three-month follow-up data for a total of thirty-six enrolled patients. Sixteen (44.5%) patients with reduced EF (HFrEF: EF 15-39%) and twenty (55.5%) patients with preserved EF (HFpEF: EF ≥40%) were enrolled. Implantation success rate and device patency with left-right shunt was 100% (post procedure and at three months) in both patient groups, with one SADE in the HFpEF group which completely resolved. Three (3/36, 8.3%) patients were hospitalised for worsening of heart failure (two HFrEF patients, one HFpEF patient). Individual patients from both the HFrEF and HFpEF groups showed improvement in symptoms and surrogate parameters of heart failure (NYHA class, six-minute walking distance, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, PCWP, NT-proBNP)., Conclusions: Implantation of the AFR device in heart failure patients is feasible and safe; shunt patency at three months was confirmed in the study. The atrial shunt improved symptoms and surrogate parameters of heart failure in some but not all patients in both the HFpEF and HFrEF groups.

Aims: The study aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety of WATCHMAN LAA closure in atrial fibrillation patients unsuitable for oral anticoagulation., Methods and Results: The EWOLUTION registry prospectively collects all clinical data on 1,005 European patients implanted with a WATCHMAN device. Following the procedure, 605 patients (60.2%) received dual antiplatelet therapy according to the local standard; DAPT was discontinued in 85% of patients within one year. CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.61.6 and 2.41.2, respectively. The periprocedural SAE rate was 3.3% (2.0% major adverse cardiac events), mostly resolving without sequelae. Device embolisation or pericardial effusion occurred in one (0.2%) and two (0.3%) patients, respectively. TEE (median 62 days post implant, IQR: 47-97) confirmed effective sealing (no leak >5 mm) in 99.2% of patients. Device thrombus was present in 22 patients (4.0%), one patient developed a stroke. One-year mortality in the DAPT group was 9.6% (N=58) reflecting the advanced age and comorbidities in this population. The ischaemic stroke rate at one year was 1.4% (expected based on CHA2DS2-VASc: 7.5%), none fatal. The major bleeding rate was 2.5%, or 2.1% excluding periprocedural events (expected rate on VKA based on HAS-BLED: 5.1%)., Conclusions: LAA closure with the WATCHMAN device followed by DAPT therapy in a high-risk patient population is safe. At one year, the intervention is associated with a substantial risk reduction regarding ischaemic stroke and major bleeding compared to the expected rate based on CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores.

Aims: While LAA closure has recently been incorporated into both European and US guidelines for stroke prevention, uncertainties regarding post-procedural drug therapy so far limit its adoption. The aim of this analysis is to compare real-world outcome data stratified for the post-procedural drug regimen employed., Methods and Results: One thousand and five patients were implanted with a WATCHMAN device in the prospective EWOLUTION study at 47 centres; 73.5% of the patients were deemed contraindicated for long-term OAC therapy. Here we report on three-month data including the first follow-up TOE exam for 94% of the study population. Following LAA closure, patients received DAPT, VKA, NOAC, single antiplatelet or no therapy (60.3%, 15.4%, 10.9%, 7% and 6.5%, respectively). Device thrombus (2.6%), stroke (0.4%) and major bleeding SAE (2.6%) rates were low overall and did not vary by post-implantation medication strategy. Patients on NOAC had the lowest bleeding rate, without an increase in device thrombus or stroke rates., Conclusions: LAA closure with the WATCHMAN device is feasible in patients with a relative or absolute contraindication to oral anticoagulation. Neither DAPT nor NOAC therapy leads to a significant increase in device thrombus, stroke or bleeding compared to the standard VKA regimen. Numerically, NOAC therapy had the lowest event rate.

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), a device-based therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, is considered an alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy, particularly for patients at high risk of bleeding. Proof of concept has been demonstrated by the PROTECT AF and PREVAIL trials which evaluated the WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) versus warfarin, showing favourable outcome for the device group. The most commonly used devices for LAAC are the WATCHMAN and its successor, the WATCHMAN FLX (Boston Scientific) and the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug and more recently the AMPLATZER Amulet device (both St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). The procedure is typically performed via a transseptal puncture under fluoroscopic and echocardiographic guidance. Technically, it is considered quite demanding due to the anatomic variability and fragility of the appendage. Careful material manipulation, adequate operator training, and good cardiac imaging and device sizing allow a safe, uneventful procedure. Post-procedure antithrombotic drug selection is based on the patient's history, indication and quality of LAAC.

Aims: Left main interventions require optimal initial results for good clinical outcome. Lesion preparation with the AngioSculpt Scoring Balloon (ASB) combined with the provisional T-stenting technique, if proven safe, might lead to better lumen gain and better clinical outcome. The aim of this registry was to investigate the safety and efficacy of the ASB as an option for lesion preparation in unprotected left main interventions (ULMI)., Methods and Results: Out of the all-comers unprotected left main registry (ULMI ALSTER), 47 patients with elective ULMI fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this study. The endpoints were acute lumen gain and 12-month MACCE. The drop-out rate was 4%. The provisional T-stenting technique was used in 97% of distal ULMI. The interventions were grouped according to use of ASB with an in-house, historical no-ASB patient control group. Lumen gain was 1.63±0.12 mm in the ASB group (n=34) and 1.35±0.12 mm in the no-ASB group (n=8, p=0.26), respectively. The use of the ASB was safe. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data for 21 patients showed numerically greater lumen area gain of 3.14±0.33 mm2 in the ASB group compared to 2.33±0.88 mm2 with the conventional technique. TLR/TVR was 6.6% overall. Twelve-month MACCE was 12.5% (4/32) for ASB and 15.4% (2/13) in the historical control group., Conclusions: Adding ASB lesion preparation to the standard provisional T-stenting technique for ULMI is feasible and safe. Low TLR and TVR rates were observed. Lesion preparation led to a numerically larger lumen gain; the data allow valid power statistics to show this approach as leading to improved outcome in a possible randomised trial.

Aims: Renal denervation has emerged as a treatment option for patients with drug-resistant hypertension. This study was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the OneShotª Renal Denervation System., Methods and Results: RAPID is a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study which enrolled 50 patients at 11 clinical sites in Europe and New Zealand. Eligible patients had an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥160 mmHg and were on a stable regimen of ≥3 antihypertensive medications including a diuretic. The primary safety endpoints were acute procedural safety at discharge and chronic procedural safety at six months. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the rate of office SBP reduction ≥10 mmHg at six months compared to baseline. While not a predefined endpoint, change in 24-hour ambulatory BP was evaluated. The mean baseline office SBP and diastolic BP measurements were 181.6±20.8 and 95.5±15.5 mmHg, respectively. Patients were on a mean of 5.1 antihypertensive medications at baseline. The mean office BP decreased by -20/-8 mmHg (p<0.0001/p=0.0002), and -22/-8 mmHg (p<0.0001/p=0.0014), from baseline to six and 12 months, respectively. The 24-hour ABPM was also significantly reduced by -11/-6 mmHg at six months compared to baseline (p=0.0085/p=0.037). There were no serious adverse events (SAE) at discharge related to groin and vascular access complication or renal artery injury or SAE/adverse device effects at six months., Conclusions: The results of the RAPID study demonstrate safe delivery of RF energy by the OneShot Renal Denervation System for renal sympathetic denervation and sustained efficacy, as evidenced by a significant reduction in office and 24-hour ABPM for six months, which was sustained up to 12 months. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01520506.

Aims: In patients with atrial fibrillation, a relevant stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2) and a relative or absolute contraindication for oral anticoagulation, catheter-based LAA occlusion is performed increasingly in Europe. The present article summarises the rationale, clinical data, devices, implantation techniques and follow-up drug regimens., Methods and Results: European survey data on patients with atrial fibrillation support the need for non-pharmacological approaches for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. A relevant bleeding risk remains with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which are also dependent on drug compliance. Recent long-term data from the PROTECT-AF trial and the CAP registry regarding the WATCHMAN LAA occluder device suggest safety and efficacy. First registry data support the safety of two other CE-marked devices, the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug (ACP) and the Coherex WaveCrest device, which have become available in Europe. Other LAA occlusion devices are in clinical development., Conclusions: Catheter-based LAA occlusion is now being developed further as an interventional approach for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Implantation techniques and devices are being improved, which will probably result in better procedural safety. Appropriate operator training is of major importance for this approach.

Aims: To prove the efficacy and safety of renal sympathetic denervation as a new treatment option for patients suffering from resistant hypertension in a real-world setting., Methods and Results: This single-centre real-world registry included 93 patients who underwent renal denervation employing the Symplicity system. Patients were followed for six months. The patient cohort was divided into early responders with a reduction of office systolic blood pressure >10 mmHg three months after the procedure (n=53, 57%), late responders (six months after the procedure, n=16, 17%) and non-responders (n=24, 26%). After six months, systolic blood pressure was lowered by 46±2.9 mmHg (mean±SEM, p<0.001), 31±3.4 mmHg (p<0.001) and 7.1±3.3 mmHg (p=0.79, ns), respectively. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring also showed a significant reduction in the early responder group (20±5.7 mmHg, p=0.002). We subjected eight patients to a re-do procedure which led to a significant reduction of blood pressure in another five patients after six months (63%). One patient in this cohort developed a one-sided renal artery stenosis associated with an increase in blood pressure., Conclusions: This real-world analysis of renal sympathetic denervation confirms the procedure to be safe and efficient in the majority of patients. Non-responders may profit from a second ablation, arguing in favour of the hypothesis that the procedure did not destroy sufficient amounts of sympathetic innervation in these patients. However, repeated denervations may also increase side effects.

Aims: The WATCHMAN® device was proven non-inferior to oral anticoagulation (OAT). However, periprocedural risks and uncertainty regarding patients with absolute contraindication for OAT limit the overall utilisation of this approach. We investigated the periprocedural safety of dual platelet inhibition and primary utilisation of larger device diameters in order to minimise peri-device leakage and repositioning of the device during the implantation process., Methods and Results: Since 2010, 59 consecutive patients have been treated with the WATCHMAN® device and followed for six months. In patients with contraindications to warfarin, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was used during the first 45 days after implantation instead of warfarin. Device size was chosen 15-30% greater than the LAA diameter in order to minimise device repositioning and leakage, and to prevent device embolisation. Small, non-trabecular recesses at the superior ridge towards the inferior, left pulmonary vein were regularly observed and followed by transoesophageal echo regarding thrombus formation. We observed a 3.3% rate of pericardial effusions and a 5% rate of thrombi at the device during the healing period of 45 days and no device embolisations. One thromboembolic event without clinical sequelae was observed during the six-month follow-up period. All patients stopped DAPT at six months as no primary or secondary leakage >5 mm around the device perimeter was observed., Conclusions: Our data suggest that DAPT can be used safely during the first 45 days in patients with contraindications to warfarin. An algorithm employing larger devices in relation to the LAA ostium with consecutively larger compression improved procedural safety compared to the current standard regarding leakage and device repositioning.

Aims: Patients with symptomatic heart failure following acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) received transendocardial application of bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (BMC) to improve left ventricular (LV) function and clinical outcome., Methods and Results: Patients (n=12) with LV ejection fraction (EF) <45% and NYHA Class ≥II received NOGA-guided transendocardial injection of BMC into the infarction border zone 17.5±0.8 days following successful interventional revascularisation after STEMI. A matched control group (n=11) was generated from the source data of the previously published LIPSIAbciximab-STEMI trial. Primary and secondary endpoints were derived from comparisons of baseline vs. six-month follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) measurements and clinical assessments. Following cell therapy we observed a significant increase of EF (+7.9±1.5%, p=0.001) while the control group showed no change. This effect was driven by a reduction of LV end-systolic volume (ESV) by -27.5±6.5 ml (p=0.001); LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and scar volu-me remained unchanged. A significant decrease of NYHA Class was found only in the cell therapy group (-0.75 vs. -0.18, p=0.04). Findings were also translated into enhancement of clinical assessments (rehospitalisation for decompensated heart failure, six-minute walk test, NT-proBNP levels)., Conclusion: The data suggest transendocardial injection of BMC can be used safely in patients with sympto-matic heart failure following acute STEMI. These prospective, preliminary data of a well-characterised, small cohort suggest efficiency compared to routine treatment.