Search

The majority of breast cancers are actually diagnosed at an early stage. Selection of the best treatment in the adjuvant setting represents a paramount step to reduce the risk of recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. At the present time decision making is based on individualized risk assessment, that takes into account patient and tumor clinical-pathological characteristics. New available tools, such as gene expression profiling, offer the potential to provide accurate prognostic and predictive information, but they require further validation. The present article provides an overview of current strategies in adjuvant breast cancer setting, and addresses a number of unresolved questions related to the role of taxanes, trastuzumab and hormonal treatment.

Purpose: To determine wether primary CEF is effective in locally advanced breast cancer, as measured by response, local recurrences, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)., Material and Methods: From 1990 to 1998, 62 patients with stage III disease were enrolled into a prospective study at Regina Elena Institute for Cancer Research, Rome. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) was included. Patients received three 21 days cycles of chemotherapy that consisted in epirubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8. G-CSF (300 microg) was given subcutaneously every other day from day 5 to day 17. After primary chemotherapy, whenever possible, mastectomy or conservative surgery was performed. Subsequently responding patients received the same regimen, while non responders were given a non cross resistant chemotherapy. In case of conservative surgery or initial T4 tumor radiation therapy was performed at the end of adjuvant chemotherapy. ER positive patients received tamoxifen 20 mg/d for five years., Results: Seven IIIA patients had a median OS of 43 months (C.I. 95%, 31-55) and DFS of 42 months (C.I. 95%, 16-68), while 15 IBC patients had a median OS of 52 months (C.I. 95%, 52-79) and DFS of 27 months (C.I. 95%, 14-39). Forty IIIB non inflammatory breast cancer patients had a median DFS of 87 months (C.I. 95%, 1-175); median OS was not reached. Ten-year OS was 28.6% for stage IIIA, 50.6% for stage IIIB and 36% for IBC., Conclusion: Primary CEF appear to be an effective treatment. In our study we obtained a good local control and interesting long term data of disease free and overall survival.

Treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has been revolutioned by the recently discovered molecular mechanism responsible for the oncogenesis of this disease. In addition, due to the rapid progress at molecular and clinical level observed in the last few years, there is a need to review the current state of the art in order to delineate appropriate guidelines for the optimal management of these tumors. A panel of experts from several specialities, including medical oncology, surgery, pathology, molecular biology and imaging, were invited to participate in a meeting to present and discuss a number of pre-selected questions, and to achieve a consensus according to the categories of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the Standard Options Recommandations (SOR) of the French Federation of Cancer Centers. Generally, consensus points were from categories 2A of the NCCN and B2 of the SOR. Conventional histologic examination with immunohistochemistry for CD117, CD34, SMA, S-100 and desmin is considered standard. Molecular analysis for the identification of KIT and PDGFRA mutation may be indicated in CD117-negative GIST. Complete tumor resection with negative margins is the optimal surgical treatment. Adjuvant imatinib should be considered an experimental approach. Neoadjuvant imatinib is also experimental, although its use may be justified in unresectable or marginally resectable GIST. Imatinib should be started in metastatic or recurrent disease, and should be continued until progressive disease or drug intolerance. In these cases, sunitinib can be used. The optimal criteria for the assessment and monitoring of GIST undergoing imatinib therapy are not well known, but they should include reduction in tumor size and disease stabilization, as well as reduction of tumor density on CT scan and metabolic activity on PET scan.

Purpose: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of cisplatin (DDP), epirubicin (EPI) and interferon alfa-2a (a-IFN) in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma., Patients and Methods: Thirty-seven pts with histologically-proven metastatic melanoma were treated with DDP 75 mg/m2 e.v. and EPI 90 mg/m2 e.v. on day 1 + alpha-IFN 9 MUI/die s.c. on days 4 to 8 and 18 to 22. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks., Results: Characteristics of the patients were the following: median age 55 years (range, 24-75), median WHO performance status 1 (range, 0-2), prior chemotherapy 9, prior immunotherapy 16 (adjuvant/advanced 11/5), sites of disease: soft tissue only 10, lung 22, liver 11, bone 1, brain 3. In 35 evaluable patients we have obtained 3 complete and 10 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 37%. Dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression with grade (G) 4 neutropenia in 59.5% of patients and G4 thrombocytopenia in 11% of patients. Other toxicities were generally mild to moderate with nausea and vomiting in 67.5% of patients, flu-like syndrome in 78.5% and fatigue in 48.5% of the patients. Median time to response, median time to progression and survival were 3 (range, 2-6), 7 (range, 2-45+) and 10 months (range, 4-45+), respectively., Conclusion: This combination is active and well tolerated in metastatic melanoma. Toxicity was manageable and has enabled us to conduct this trial on an outpatient basis.

Purpose: To assess the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine in locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients (pts)., Patients and Methods: Gemcitabine was administered on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks at a dose of 1.000/1.250 mg/m2, respectively, in pretreated or not pretreated pts., Results: Eighteen pts entered this phase II trial; sixteen had been previously treated with anthracyclines and ifosfamide. A partial response was observed in a woman with fibrous malignant istocytoma, whereas in 7 pts the disease remained stable. Median time to progression was 4 months. The treatment was well tolerated. Grade 4 toxicity was not observed., Conclusions: These results do not suggest that gemcitabine, in the dose and schedule used in this trial, may be of value in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas.

Objective: The objective of this trial was to assess the therapeutic activity and toxicity of ifosfamide (IFO) with mesna uroprotection as salvage therapy in patients (pts) with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) who had failed high-dose epirubicin treatment., Patients and Methods: IFO was administered at a dose of 2.0 g/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days by a 2-h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks., Results: Partial responses were observed in 5/31 (16%) evaluable patients, whereas in other 5 pts the disease remained stable. The median duration of response was 8 months. The median overall survival was 6.5 months. The most common toxicity was hematologic with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 47% of the pts. Neurologic toxicity was infrequent, but in 1 patient treatment discontinuation was needed because of severe mental confusion and disorientation., Conclusions: Although IFO can be of value in a minority of pts with anthracycline-refractory STS, more active agents and new salvage cytotoxic regimens should be investigated in this disease.

Purpose: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of docetaxel (TXT) as second line therapy in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma., Patients and Methods: Adult patients (pts) with histologically proven locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, were treated with TXT at a dose of 100 mg/m2 in a 1-hour i.v. infusion every 21 days and steroid premedication with oral prednisone 50 mg twice a day for five days starting 24 hours prior to TXT., Results: From November 1995 to May 1997, 19 pretreated pts entered the trial. Characteristics of the pts: males/females 11/8, median age 58 years (30-74), median WHO performance status 1 (0-2); histotypes: leiomyosarcoma 6 pts, malignant fibrous histiocytoma 6 pts, fibrosarcoma 2 pts, others 5 pts. No objective responses were seen. The disease remained stable in 8 pts (42%). Median time to progression was 3.5 months (range, 2-8), median survival 6 months (range, 2-20). The treatment was well-tolerated: the main side effect was hematological toxicity with G3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia in 58% of the pts; G3 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred only in 1 case. Other toxicities were alopecia that was universal, G3 emesis in 1 pt, G3 diarrhea in 2 pts, G3 stomatitis in 1 pt. Mild fluid retention was recorded only in 2 pts., Conclusions: The results of this study do not suggest the use of TXT at this dosage and schedule in advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Purpose: We performed a randomized trial to evaluate the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane (DEX) in advanced breast cancer patients (ABC) treated with high single-dose epirubicin (EPI). A secondary objective was to determine the role of radioimmunoscintigraphy (RIS) in the assessment of epirubicin cardiotoxicity., Patients and Methods: Ninety-five patients with ABC were treated with EPI 160 mg/m2 by i.v. bolus every 3 weeks with or without DEX, 1,000 mg/m2 i.v. Cardiac monitoring included multigated radionuclide (MUGA) scan with determination of resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and RIS with 111-Indium antimyosin monoclonal antibodies., Results: The overall response rate was 69% in the EPI arm and 67% in the EPI + DEX arm; median time to response and median time to progression were identical in both arms, being 2 and 8 months, respectively. Median survival was 19 months versus 29 months (p 0.21), respectively. DEX did not appear to contribute to extracardiac EPI toxicity. Congestive heart failure occurred only in the EPI arm (2 instances). LVEF significantly decreased from baseline only in the EPI group. An abnormal tracer uptake at RIS was observed early in both arms, but the increase in heart to lung ratio was much more evident in the control group., Conclusions: DEX significantly protects against the development of high dose epirubicin cardiotoxicity apparently without evidence of an adverse impact on antitumor activity and non cardiac toxicity. RIS is a very sensitive technique in detecting anthracycline cardiac damage, but its specificity is low and cannot be considered alone a primary test for guiding anthracycline treatment.

Twenty-seven postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer were treated with the potent LHRH-agonist buserelin. The drug was given s.c. three times daily at a daily dosage of 3 mg the first week and subsequently of 2 mg daily. Although pituitary gonadotropins were suppressed in all cases, no response was observed in 26 evaluable patients. This study does not confirm earlier findings suggesting a role for LHRH-agonists in the treatment of postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Forty-five consecutive patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with 5-fluorouracil and high dose folinic acid. Among 43 evaluable patients there were 7 objective responses for an overall response rate of 16%. Toxicity was generally mild and rapidly reversible. Compared to those reported with 5-fluorouracil alone, these results failed to demonstrate an increase in response rate in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with the combination of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid.