1. Towards a Unified Model of Scholarly Argumentation (Dagstuhl Seminar 22432)
- Author
-
Khalid Al-Khatib and Anita de Waard and Dayne Freitag and Iryna Gurevych and Yufang Hou and Harrisen Scells, Al-Khatib, Khalid, de Waard, Anita, Freitag, Dayne, Gurevych, Iryna, Hou, Yufang, Scells, Harrisen, Khalid Al-Khatib and Anita de Waard and Dayne Freitag and Iryna Gurevych and Yufang Hou and Harrisen Scells, Al-Khatib, Khalid, de Waard, Anita, Freitag, Dayne, Gurevych, Iryna, Hou, Yufang, and Scells, Harrisen
- Abstract
This report summarizes the outcomes of the Dagstuhl Seminar 22432: "Towards a Unified Model of Scholarly Argumentation." The purpose of this Seminar was to enable robust advances in argumentation technology by collecting and collaborating on use cases in scholarly and biomedical discourse and working on a foundational model for argumentation in science and healthcare. Most importantly, the seminar served to develop a multidisciplinary, international research community devoted to building and maintaining principles, tools, and models for studying scholarly argumentation. Over the course of the seminar week, the seminar laid the foundation of a shared formalism, illuminated important scholarly use cases for argumentation modeling, and identified directions for future exploration.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF