Search

Background: The traction-induced esophageal growth (Foker) process for the treatment of long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) relies on applying progressive tension to the esophagus to induce growth. Due to its anti-fibrotic and muscle-relaxing properties, we hypothesize that Botulinum Toxin A (BTX) can enhance traction-induced esophageal growth., Methods: A retrospective two-center cohort study was conducted on children who underwent a BTX-enhanced Foker process for LGEA repair from 2021 to 2023. BTX (10 units/ml, 2 units/kg, per esophageal pouch) was applied at the time of traction initiation. Time on traction, complications, and anastomotic outcomes were compared against historical controls (Foker process without BTX) from 2014 to 2021., Results: Twenty infants (LGEA type A:12, B:4, C:4; 35% reoperative; median [IQR] age 3 [2-5] months), underwent BTX-enhanced Foker process (thoracotomy with external traction: 9; minimally invasive [MIS] multi-staged internal traction: 11). Mean gap lengths were similar between BTX-enhanced external and external traction control patients (mean [SD], 50.6 mm [12.6] vs. 44.5 mm [11.9], p = 0.21). When compared to controls, the BTX-enhanced external traction process was significantly faster (mean [SD], 12.1 [1.6] days vs. 16.6 [13.2] without BTX, p = 0.04) despite similar preoperative gap lengths. There was no difference in time on traction for those undergoing a minimally invasive process. There were no significant differences in complications or anastomotic outcomes in either cohort., Conclusion: Botulinum toxin may play a role in accelerating the traction-induced esophageal growth process for LGEA repair. Minimizing time on traction can decrease sedation and paralysis burden while on external traction. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effects of BTX on the esophagus., Level of Evidence: Level III., Type of Study: Retrospective, Two-center, Cohort study., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no sources of financial support or conflicts of interest that are relevant to this work., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Historically, children afflicted with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) had few options, either esophageal replacement or a life of gastrostomy feeds. In 1997, John Foker from Minnesota revolutionized the treatment of LGEA. His new procedure focused on "traction-induced growth" when the proximal and distal esophageal segments were too far apart for primary repair. Foker's approach involved placement of pledgeted sutures on both esophageal pouches connected to an externalized traction system which could be serially tightened, allowing for tension-induced esophageal growth and a delayed primary repair. Despite its potential, the Foker process was received with criticism and disbelief, and to this day, controversy remains regarding its mechanism of action - esophageal growth versus stretch. Nonetheless, early adopters such as Rusty Jennings of Boston embraced Foker's central principle that "one's own esophagus is best" and was instrumental to the implementation and rise in popularity of the Foker process. The downstream effects of this emphasis on esophageal preservation would uncover the need for a focused yet multidisciplinary approach to the many challenges that EA children face beyond "just the esophagus", leading to the first Esophageal and Airway Treatment Center for children. Consequently, the development of new techniques for the multidimensional care of the LGEA child evolved such as the posterior tracheopexy for associated tracheomalacia, the supercharged jejunal interposition, as well as minimally invasive internalized esophageal traction systems. We recognize the work of Foker and Jennings as key catalysts of an era of esophageal preservation and multidisciplinary care of children with EA., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest We declare that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)