Search

Objectives: Prognostication for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) remains difficult. We sought to validate the SI 2 NCAL 2 C score in an international cohort., Materials and Methods: The SI 2 NCAL 2 C score was originally developed to predict poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6) at 6 months, and mortality at 30 days and 1 year using data from the International CVT Consortium. The SI 2 NCAL 2 C score uses 9 variables: the absence of any female-sex-specific risk factors, intracerebral hemorrhage, central nervous system infection, focal neurological deficits, coma, age, lower level of hemoglobin, higher level of glucose, and cancer. The ACTION-CVT study was an international retrospective study that enrolled consecutive patients across 27 centers. The poor outcome score was validated using 90-day mRS due to lack of follow-up at the 6-month time-point in the ACTION-CVT cohort. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration plots. Missing data were imputed using the additive regression and predictive mean matching methods. Bootstrapping was performed with 1000 iterations., Results: Mortality data were available for 950 patients and poor outcome data were available for 587 of 1,025 patients enrolled in ACTION-CVT. Compared to the International CVT Consortium, the ACTION-CVT cohort was older, less often female, and with milder clinical presentation. Mortality was 2.5% by 30 days and 6.0% by one year. At 90-days, 16.7% had a poor outcome. The SI 2 NCAL 2 C score had an AUC of 0.74 [95% CI 0.69-0.79] for 90-day poor outcome, 0.72 [0.60-0.82] for mortality by 30 days, and 0.82 [0.76-0.88] for mortality by one year., Conclusions: The SI 2 NCAL 2 C score had acceptable to good performance in an international external validation cohort. The SI 2 NCAL 2 C score warrants additional validation studies in diverse populations and clinical implementation studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Thanh Nguyen reports research support from Medtronic and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology; advisory board with Brainomix, Aruna Bio; Associate Editor of Stroke. Erik Lindgren reports research support from the Swedish state, ALF agreement (ALFGBG 942851), the Swedish Neurological Society, Elsa and Gustav Lindh's Foundation, Wennerström's Foundation, P-O Ahl's Foundation, and the Rune and Ulla Amlöv's Foundation. Katarina Jood reports research support from the Swedish state ALF agreement (ALFGBG-965417). Mirjam R. Heldner reports grants from SITEM Research Support Funds and Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, not directly related to this manuscript. Thalia S Field reports honoraria for advisory board work for HLS Therapeutics, Roche Canada, AstraZeneca, in-kind study medication from Bayer Canada, is on the board of DESTINE Health, and is supported by a Heart and Stroke/Sauder Family Professorship of Stroke Research at the University of British Columbia. Christoph Stretz reports departmental funding (funds managed by Rhode Island Hospital) for his site's participation in the Neuro AFib study from Massachusetts General Hospital/BSC. Nils Henninger was supported by NINDS R21NS131756 during the conduct of this study (unrelated). Turgut Tatlisumak serves or has served on advisory boards for Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Inventiva, and Portola Pharma and received research funding from European Union, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, and Wennerström's Foundation. Diana Aguiar de Sousa reports advisory board participation for Astrazenica, Organon, and Johnson & Johnson, speaker fees from Bial, Bayer, and Astrazeneca, and DSMB participation for the SECRET trial (all unrelated)., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Individual subcortical infarct scoring for the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) can be difficult and is subjected to higher inter-reader variability. This study compares performance of the 10-point ASPECTS with a new 7-point cortically-weighted score in predicting post-thrombectomy functional outcomes., Materials and Methods: Prospective registry data from two comprehensive stroke centers (Site 1 2016-2021; Site 2: 2019-2021) included patients with either M1 segment of middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery occlusions who underwent thrombectomy. Two multivariate proportional odds training models utilizing either 10-point or 7-point ASPECTS predicting 90-day shift in modified Rankin score were generated using Site 1 data and validated with Site 2 data. Models were compared using multiclass receiver operator characteristics, corrected Akaike's Information Criterion, and likelihood ratio test., Results: Of 328 patients (Site 1 = 181, Site 2 = 147), median age was 71y (IQR 61-82), 119 (36%) had internal carotid artery occlusions, and median 10-point ASPECTS was 9 (IQR 8-10). There was no difference in performance between models using either total or cortically-weighted ASPECTS (p=0.14). Validation cohort data were correctly (i.e., predicting modified Rankin score within one point) classified 50% (cortically-weighted score model) and 56% (total score model) of the time., Conclusions: The 7-point cortically-weighted ASPECTS was similarly predictive of post-thrombectomy functional outcome as 10-point ASPECTS. Given noninferior performance, the cortically-weighted score is a potentially reliable, but simplified, alternative to the traditional scoring paradigm, with potential implications in automated image analysis tool development., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We sought to provide updated incidence and trend data for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in the United States from 2016-2020, examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CVT, and identify predictors of in-hospital mortality., Materials and Methods: Validated ICD-10 codes were used to identify discharges with CVT in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Sample weights were applied to generate nationally representative estimates, and census data were used to compute incidence rates. The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was defined as January-May 2020. Trend analysis was completed using Joinpoint regression., Results: From 2016 to 2020, the incidence of CVT increased from 24.34 per 1,000,000 population per year (MPY) to 33.63 per MPY (Annual Percentage Change (APC) 8.6 %; p < 0.001). All-cause in-hospital mortality was 4.9 % [95 % CI 4.5-5.4]. On multivariable analysis, use of thrombectomy, increased age, atrial fibrillation, stroke diagnosis, infection, presence of prothrombotic hematologic conditions, lowest quartile of income, intracranial hemorrhage, and male sex were associated with in-hospital mortality. CVT incidence was similar comparing the first 5 months of 2020 and 2019 (31.37 vs 32.04; p = 0.322) with no difference in median NIHSS (2 [IQR 1-10] vs. 2 [1-9]; p = 0.959) or mortality (4.2 % vs. 5.6 %; p = 0.176)., Conclusions: CVT incidence increased in the US from 2016 to 2020 while mortality did not change. Increased age, prothrombotic state, stroke diagnosis, infection, atrial fibrillation, male sex, lowest quartile of income, intracranial hemorrhage, and use of thrombectomy were associated with in-hospital mortality following CVT. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, CVT volumes and mortality were similar to the prior year., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest A.D.H holds royalties or licenses from UptoDate and receives consulting fees from NovoNordisk and Integra. S.Y. holds royalties or licenses from UptoDate. T.N.N participates on data safety monitoring boards of various trials, served on the advisory board of Idorsia, Brainomix, Associate Editor of Stroke, and President of SVIN society. T.S.F reports research grants from Bayer and consultancy for HLS Therapeutics. S.A.K reports compensation from Stryker for other services. A.I.Q. reports fees from AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Uncertainty remains on the optimal management of basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in 2019 and 2021 demonstrated neutral results with respect to the use of endovascular therapy (EVT) for BAO. This study aimed to understand regional variation in physicians' perceptions towards the treatment of BAO as stratified by physician respondents from China versus outside China, prior to the publication of studies demonstrating a benefit of EVT for BAO., Methods: An international online survey was conducted of stroke neurologists and neurointerventionalists from January to March 2022. Survey questions evaluated physician opinions toward the use of EVT in BAO, as well as the clinical and imaging features underlying treatment decisions. Respondents were dichotomized as either from China or from other countries and differences between groups were analyzed., Results: There were 1245 physician respondents across 73 countries of which 295 (23.7%) were from China. Compared to respondents from the rest of the world, respondents from China were more likely to be interventionalists (71.5% vs 35.0%; p < 0.0001). Overall, more than 95% of respondents believed that EVT was superior to medical therapy under certain circumstances. Chinese respondents were more likely to believe that further RCTs were necessary than respondents from other countries (93.6% vs 76.2%; p < 0.0001). Chinese respondents were more likely to use advanced imaging in later time windows and use a premorbid mRS threshold of ≤2 for BAO selection to EVT., Conclusion: Most stroke physicians believe EVT is beneficial in selected patients with BAO. Clinical and imaging modality differences were observed in the selection criteria used for EVT. There was greater inclination to enroll all trial eligible patients in a BAO RCT by respondents from China as compared to other parts of the world., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) accounts for up to 20% of all strokes. Potential contributors to ESUS include patent foramen ovale (PFO) and non-stenotic plaque (<50%, NSP) of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery (ICA). To better differentiate these as unique mechanisms, we explored the prevalence of each in a multicenter observational cohort., Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort of consecutive patients with ESUS was queried (2015-2021). Patients with unilateral, anterior circulation ESUS who had a computed tomography angiography neck scan and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and/or transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) with adequate visualization of a PFO were included. Patients with prior carotid stent, endarterectomy or alternative etiologies were excluded from the study. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patients with and without PFO, with multivariable logistic regression used to predict the presence of a PFO based on clinicoradiographic factors as well as degree of luminal stenosis and ipsilateral plaque thickness >3mm, based on previously published thresholds of clinical relevance., Results: Of the 234 included patients with unilateral anterior ESUS and adequate TTE or TEE, 17 (7.3%) had a PFO and 64 (27.4%) had ≥3mm of ipsilateral ICA plaque. Patients with PFO had significantly less NSP and less ipsilateral cervical ICA stenosis (0% [IQR 0-0%] vs. 0% [IQR 0-50%], p=0.03; Table). After adjustment for all predictors of PFO in multivariable regression (p<0.1: Hispanic ethnicity and ipsilateral plaque thickness), ipsilateral NSP was independently associated with a 62% lower odds of harboring a PFO (OR adj  per 1cm of plaque 0.48, 95%CI 0.25-0.94). No patients with a PFO had ≥3mm of ipsilateral ICA plaque., Conclusion: Ipsilateral NSP is more common in ESUS patients without a PFO. While this study is limited by the small PFO event rate, it supports the notion that NSP and PFO may be independent contributors to ESUS., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: RCVS (Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstrictive Syndrome) is a condition associated with vasoactive agents that alter endothelial function. There is growing evidence that endothelial inflammation contributes to cerebrovascular disease in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In our study, we describe the clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of RCVS in a multicenter case series of patients with COVID-19., Materials and Methods: Multicenter retrospective case series. We collected clinical characteristics, imaging, and outcomes of patients with RCVS and COVID-19 identified at each participating site., Results: Ten patients were identified, 7 women, ages 21 - 62 years. Risk factors included use of vasoconstrictive agents in 7 and history of migraine in 2. Presenting symptoms included thunderclap headache in 5 patients with recurrent headaches in 4. Eight were hypertensive on arrival to the hospital. Symptoms of COVID-19 included fever in 2, respiratory symptoms in 8, and gastrointestinal symptoms in 1. One patient did not have systemic COVID-19 symptoms. MRI showed subarachnoid hemorrhage in 3 cases, intraparenchymal hemorrhage in 2, acute ischemic stroke in 4, FLAIR hyperintensities in 2, and no abnormalities in 1 case. Neurovascular imaging showed focal segment irregularity and narrowing concerning for vasospasm of the left MCA in 4 cases and diffuse, multifocal narrowing of the intracranial vasculature in 6 cases. Outcomes varied, with 2 deaths, 2 remaining in the ICU, and 6 surviving to discharge with modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 0 (n=3), 2 (n=2), and 3 (n=1)., Conclusions: Our series suggests that patients with COVID-19 may be at risk for RCVS, particularly in the setting of additional risk factors such as exposure to vasoactive agents. There was variability in the symptoms and severity of COVID-19, clinical characteristics, abnormalities on imaging, and mRS scores. However, a larger study is needed to validate a causal relationship between RCVS and COVID-19., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Embolic stroke is a frequent complication of infective endocarditis yet lacks acute treatment as intravenous thrombolysis should be avoided due to high risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. Mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion may be a promising treatment but there is limited data on safety outcomes in infective endocarditis., Materials and Methods: In this multi-center retrospective case series, we reviewed data from patients with infective endocarditis-related large vessel occlusion who underwent mechanical thrombectomy in 9 US hospitals., Results: We identified 15 patients at 9 hospitals. A minority presented with signs suggesting infection (2 patients (14%) had fever, 7 (47%) were tachycardic, 2 (13%) were hypotensive, and 8 (53%) had leukocytosis). The median National Institute of Health Stroke Score decreased from 19 (range 9-25) at presentation to 7 post-thrombectomy (range 0-22, median best score post-thrombectomy), and the median modified Rankin Scale on or after discharge for survivors was 3 (range 0-6). Approximately 57% of patients had a modified Rankin Scale between 0 and 3 on or after discharge. Hemorrhagic transformation was observed in 7/15 (47%). The mechanical thrombectomy group had 2/9 petechial hemorrhagic transformation (22%), compared to 4/6 parenchymal hematomas (67%) in the tissue plasminogen activator + mechanical thrombectomy group., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients with large vessel occlusion due to infective endocarditis may not present with overt signs of infection. Mechanical thrombectomy may be an effective treatment in this patient population for whom intravenous thrombolysis should be avoided., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None, (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: COVID-19 infection has been known to predispose patients to both arterial and venous thromboembolic events such as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke. A few reports from the literature suggest that Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVSTs) may be a direct complication of COVID-19., Objective: To review the clinical and radiological presentation of COVID-19 positive patients diagnosed with CVST., Methods: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional, retrospective study of patients diagnosed with CVST and COVID-19 reviewed from March 1, 2020 to November 8, 2020. We evaluated their clinical presentations, risk factors, clinical management, and outcome. We reviewed all published cases of CVST in patients with COVID-19 infection from January 1, 2020 to November 13, 2020., Results: There were 8 patients diagnosed with CVST and COVID-19 during the study period at 7 out of 31 participating centers. Patients in our case series were mostly female (7/8, 87.5%). Most patients presented with non-specific symptoms such as headache (50%), fever (50%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (75%). Several patients presented with focal neurologic deficits (2/8, 25%) or decreased consciousness (2/8, 25%). D-dimer and inflammatory biomarkers were significantly elevated relative to reference ranges in patients with available laboratory data. The superior sagittal and transverse sinuses were the most common sites for acute CVST formation (6/8, 75%). Median time to onset of focal neurologic deficit from initial COVID-19 diagnosis was 3 days (interquartile range 0.75-3 days). Median time from onset of COVID-19 symptoms to CVST radiologic diagnosis was 11 days (interquartile range 6-16.75 days). Mortality was low in this cohort (1/8 or 12.5%)., Conclusions: Clinicians should consider the risk of acute CVST in patients positive for COVID-19, especially if neurological symptoms develop., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a neurologic emergency that requires immediate patient stabilization and prompt diagnosis and treatment. Early measures should focus on principles of advanced cardiovascular life support. The aneurysm should be evaluated and treated in a comprehensive stroke center by a multidisciplinary team capable of endovascular and, operative approaches. Once the aneurysm is secured, the patient is best managed by a dedicated neurocritical care service to prevent and manage complications, including a syndrome of delayed neurologic decline. The goal of such specialized care is to prevent secondary injury, reduce length of stay, and improve outcomes for survivors of the disease., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr D.Y. Chung and Dr M. Abdalkader have no disclosures. Dr T.N. Nguyen is Principal Investigator of the CLEAR study (CT for Late Endovascular Reperfusion) funded by Medtronic and serves on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for TESLA (Thrombectomy for Emergent Salvage of Large Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke), ENDOLOW (Endovascular Therapy for Low NIHSS Ischemic Strokes), and SELECT 2 (a randomized controlled trial to optimize patient’s selection for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke), and CREST-2 trials., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr Catanese receives CSC SPARC Funding for COVID-19 and stroke research. Dr Nguyen is Principal Investigator of the CLEAR study (CT for Late Endovascular Reperfusion) funded by Medtronic; serves on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for TESLA (Thrombectomy for Emergent Salvage of Large Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke), ENDOLOW (Endovascular Therapy for Low NIHSS Ischemic Strokes), SELECT 2 (A Randomized Controlled Trial to Optimize Patient's Selection for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke) trials. The remaining authors have no disclosures relevant to this manuscript.

Introduction: Early studies suggest that acute cerebrovascular events may be common in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may be associated with a high mortality rate. Most cerebrovascular events described have been ischemic strokes, but both intracerebral hemorrhage and rarely cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) have also been reported. The diagnosis of CVST can be elusive, with wide-ranging and nonspecific presenting symptoms that can include headache or altered sensorium alone., Objective: To describe the presentation, barriers to diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of CVST in patients with COVID-19., Methods: We abstracted data on all patients diagnosed with CVST and COVID-19 from March 1 to August 9, 2020 at Boston Medical Center. Subsequently, we reviewed the literature and extracted all published cases of CVST in patients with COVID-19 from January 1, 2020 through August 9, 2020 and included all studies with case descriptions., Results: We describe the clinical features and management of CVST in 3 women with COVID-19 who developed CVST days to months after initial COVID-19 symptoms. Two patients presented with encephalopathy and without focal neurologic deficits, while one presented with visual symptoms. All patients were treated with intravenous hydration and anticoagulation. None suffered hemorrhagic complications, and all were discharged home. We identified 12 other patients with CVST in the setting of COVID-19 via literature search. There was a female predominance (54.5%), most patients presented with altered sensorium (54.5%), and there was a high mortality rate (36.4%)., Conclusions: During this pandemic, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for CVST in patients with a recent history of COVID-19 presenting with non-specific neurological symptoms such as headache to provide expedient management and prevent complications. The limited data suggests that CVST in COVID-19 is more prevalent in females and may be associated with high mortality., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients require frequent neurological examinations, neuroradiographic diagnostic testing and lengthy intensive care unit stay. Previously established SAH treatment protocols are impractical to impossible to adhere to in the current COVID-19 crisis due to the need for infection containment and shortage of critical care resources, including personal protective equipment (PPE). Centers need to adopt modified protocols to optimize SAH care and outcomes during this crisis. In this opinion piece, we assembled a multidisciplinary, multicenter team to develop and propose a modified guidance algorithm that optimizes SAH care and workflow in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. This guidance is to be adapted to the available resources of a local institution and does not replace clinical judgment when faced with an individual patient., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)