Search

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an underdiagnosed pathology with a high morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis and follow-up are mostly carried out in primary care (PC). The objective of our study is to classify COPD patients according to GOLD 2019 and GesEPOC 2017 guidelines. As secondary objectives, to analyze the type of risk and to describe and compare the prescribed treatment with that recommended by the guidelines., Material and Methods: Multicenter cross-sectional observational study in seven Health Care centers. 637 COPD patients between 35 and 85years old were included., Results: The mean age was 70.3years old, 84.6% had comorbidities and 43.5% were active smokers. The mean post-bronchodilator FEV 1 was 61.92% (SD: 17.42). Most are patients with mMRC=1 (43.8%), 57.8% CAT<10. Mild BODEx index (75.7%). GoldA was the majority (47.7%). The most frequent phenotype was non-exacerbator (61.1%). 25% were ACOs. 56.2% were low-risk patients. 20.6% had not been prescribed any treatment, LABA +LAMA +CI (19.6%), LAMA +LABA (16.5%) and LAMA (16.3%). If we compare the treatments that the patients have prescribed, with the one is recommended by GOLD, we obtain that 61% coincide with moderate concordance, while if we compare with GesEPOC, 53.8% coincide with weak concordance. 73.4% of the treatments coincide between both documents (moderate agreement)., Conclusions: COPD patients treated in PC are low risk, mild and non-exacerbators. If we compare the treatments that the patients have prescribed, with what is recommended by GOLD and GesEPOC, we find a moderate and weak concordance, respectively., (Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Asthma is a highly prevalent disease that can affect the quality of life (QoL). The objective of this study is to determine the QoL in patients with asthma and its relationship with different factors in a Primary Care centre., Material and Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in an urban health centre. The study included a total of 243 patients between 17 to 70 years who had a diagnosis of asthma in their medical records. The QoL was measured using the Spanish version of the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, with age, sex, smoking, anxiety, depression, severity and control of asthma as associated variables., Results: The mean age was 44.5 years and 71.2% were women. More than half (54.3%) had intermittent asthma, and 45.7% persistent asthma. The overall score in the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire was 5.4 out of 7. The scores by dimensions were: symptoms 5.4; limitation of activities 5.8; emotional function 5.7, and environmental stimuli 4.7. The variables with a worse QoL score that remained statistically significant (P<.05) in the multivariate analysis were poor control of asthma (in all dimensions), history of depression (in all except environmental stimuli), educated to less than secondary level (symptoms and emotional function), and patients admitted to hospital in the past 3 years (symptoms) and who used long-term beta-adrenergics (emotional function)., Conclusions: Patients with intermittent, mild and moderate asthma have a good QoL. Poor control of the asthma and a history of depression negatively affect the QoL., (Copyright © 2015 Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria (SEMERGEN). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)