Search

Lymphocytopenia is one of the main toxicities of radiotherapy and its severity is related to the irradiation dose. The occurrence of lymphocytopenia depends on the body site of radiotherapy; it is most pronounced with pelvic irradiation, whereas the effect of brain irradiation on the lymphocyte count is to be elucidated. This preliminary study was performed to evaluate changes in lymphocyte number occurring during brain irradiation in cancer patients with brain metastases. The study included 50 patients who received brain radiotherapy for single or multiple brain metastases at a total dose of 30 Gy. Overall, no significant changes in mean lymphocyte number occurred during brain radiotherapy. However, when lymphocyte variations were assessed in relation to the clinical response of brain metastases, a significant increase in the mean number of lymphocytes was found in patients who achieved objective regression of brain metastases on brain irradiation. The mean lymphocyte number decreased in nonresponding patients, albeit without a statistically significant difference with respect to the pretreatment values. The results of this study show that the efficacy of radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases is associated with a significant increase in mean lymphocyte number. Therefore, evidence of brain irradiation-induced lymphocytosis may predict the efficacy of radiotherapy.

It has been shown that each manipulation of the mammary region, including breast surgery, may stimulate prolactin secretion. However, it has also been observed that in more than 50% of breast cancer patients surgical removal of the tumor is not followed by enhanced prolactin secretion. This might be indicative of an altered psychoneuroendocrine control of the mammary gland, which could lead to the onset of more biologically aggressive breast cancer. In fact, surgery-induced hyperprolactinemia has been proven to be associated with a better prognosis in terms of survival in node-negative breast cancer patients. The present study was performed to investigate the impact of postoperative hyperprolactinemia on the disease-free survival (DFS) of breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement. The study included 100 consecutive node-positive breast cancer patients who were followed for at least 10 years. Surgery-induced hyperprolactinemia occurred in 45/100 (45%) patients without any significant correlation with the main prognostic variables including number of involved nodes and ER status. The two groups of patients received the same adjuvant therapies. After a median follow-up of 151 months, the recurrence rate in patients with surgery-induced hyperprolactinemia was significantly lower than in patients with no postoperative hyperprolactinemia (23/45 vs 43/55, p<0.01). Moreover, DFS was significantly longer in hyperprolactinemic patients than in patients who had no enhanced secretion of prolactin postoperatively. In agreement with the results described previously in node-negative breast cancer, our study demonstrates the favorable prognostic significance of surgery-induced hyperprolactinemia in terms of DFS duration also in breast cancer patients with axillary node involvement, independent of the other well-known prognostic variables, thereby confirming that the psychoneuroendocrine status of cancer patients may influence the prognosis of their disease.

Several endogenous hormones have been proven to stimulate cancer growth, whereas at present very few hormones are known to display oncostatic activity. The most widely investigated antitumor hormone is the pineal indole melatonin (MLT), and cancer progression has been shown to be associated with a decline in MLT secretion. Recently, another hormone, the adrenal steroid dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS), has appeared to exert antitumor effects similar to those previously described for MLT. In addition, experimental studies suggest a diminished DHEAS production with neoplastic progression. This preliminary study was performed to evaluate the daily secretion of DHEAS in a group of early and advanced cancer patients. The study included 70 patients with solid tumors (gastrointestinal tract tumors: 28; breast cancer: 24; non-small cell lung cancer: 18), 28 without and 42 with distant metastases. The serum levels of DHEAS were measured by RIA in blood samples collected in the morning. The control group consisted of 100 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. No significant difference in mean serum levels of DHEAS was observed between controls and non-metastatic patients. In contrast, metastatic patients, irrespectively of tumor histotype, showed significantly lower mean levels of DHEAS with respect to either controls or non-metastatic patients. Moreover, metastatic patients with visceral locations showed significantly lower values of DHEAS than those with bone or soft-tissue metastases. This preliminary study would suggest there to be a deficiency in the daily DHEA secretion in patients with disseminated cancer. Further studies evaluating circadian DHEAS secretion in relation in that of the pineal hormone MLT will be required to better define the biological significance of the advanced cancer-related decline in endogenous DHEAS production.

Blood levels of the immunosuppressive cytokines IL-6 and IL-10 are often abnormally high in patients with advanced cancer. However, since IL-6 and IL-10 may be produced by macrophages and TH2 cells, the evidence of abnormally high values of IL-6 and/or IL-10 may reflect hyperactivation either of the macrophage system or of TH2 cell functions. In contrast, IL-4 is almost completely produced by the TH2 lymphocytes. Therefore, evaluation of IL-4 levels could help to differentiate macrophage from TH2 cell hyperactivation. This study was performed to investigate IL-4 serum levels in a group of cancer patients in relation to the stage of disease and to the secretion of other cytokines. The study included 50 patients, 28 of whom showed distant organ metastases. Lung cancer and gastrointestinal cancers were the most frequent neoplasms in our patients. The control group consisted of 60 healthy subjects. IL-4 was measured by the Elisa method. No patient showed high levels of IL-4. No significant differences were seen between controls and cancer patients, nor between metastatic and non-metastatic patients. In addition, no significant differences in IL-4 mean values were found between patients with normal or high levels of IL-6 and IL-10, or between patients with normal or low IL-2 concentrations. This preliminary study seems to exclude cancer-related abnormally high secretion of IL-4. Therefore, the high levels of IL-6 and/or IL-10 often occurring in advanced neoplastic disease would mainly depend on macrophage production.