Search

Background: Hamstring injuries at the musculotendinous junction are relatively common. However, injuries to the proximal hamstring account for just 12% of hamstring injuries. Surgical repair of these injuries including both open and endoscopic techniques are becoming increasingly more common. Indications: Surgical intervention is generally reserved for cases with 2 or more torn tendons and at least 2 centimeters of retraction. Technique Description: The combined open and endoscopic technique utilizes direct posterior and posterolateral portals. After visualizing the posterior femoral cutaneous (PFCN) and sciatic nerves (SN), the proximal hamstring tear is identified, and the shaver is used to remove any surrounding adhesions and aid in clearing any hematoma. The ischial tuberosity is prepared using a shaver, radiofrequency ablation, and a 5.5 mm, round arthroscopic burr. Two, 4.5 mm, doubled-loaded anchors are placed into the ischium. The incision for the open portion of the case is created by incising the skin between the direct posterior and posterolateral portals. A dissection is continued down to the gluteal fascia, and the gluteal fascia is incised in line with the surgical incision. The gluteus maximus is retracted then the hamstring stump is secured with a stay suture and brought outside the surgical incision for inspection. The double-loaded sutures are passed in a running locking technique. The other suture limbs are then passed through the central aspect of the tendon and tensioned to reduce the proximal hamstring onto the prepared tuberosity. Results: Significant postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcomes have been reported for open and endoscopic repairs in isolation, but to date there are no outcomes studies on the combined “Scopen” technique. Postoperative complications may include numbness or neuropraxia, re-rupture, infection, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Discussion: The endoscopic portion allows an improved view and preservation of the SN and PFCN, as well as a detailed view of the ischial tuberosity for decortication and anchor placement in comparison with a purely open approach. In comparison with a purely endoscopic approach, this combined approach can be used in patients with retraction >4 cm, and can also be utilized for chronic, retracted tears as well.

Background: At the time of hip arthroscopy, some patients are found to have irreparable labral tears that are not amenable to primary repair. For these patients, treatment with segmental reconstruction is a surgical option to restore labral tissue and biomechanics. Indications: Patients with segmental irreparable hip labral tears that are technically not amenable for primary labral repair should be considered for labral reconstruction with allograft. Technique Description: Standard hip arthroscopic portals are established. An interportal capsulotomy is performed, and acetabular rim trimming is performed to remove the pincer deformity. Visualized segmental labral defects are measured using a piece of suture to allow for measurement of a curved surface and 1.4-mm polyether ether ketone (PEEK) anchors are placed in anticipation of labral fixation. On the back table, the tibialis anterior allograft is prepared for labral reconstruction. We mark a central portion of the graft tissue based on the measured defect size. A 3-0 vicryl suture is used to place a running stitch from one end to the other of the marked portion of the allograft and the marked, prepared graft is sharply divided from the rest of the tissue. Stitches from the anterior and posterior anchors are passed through the graft using a free needle. The graft is then placed through the distal accessory anterolateral portal and positioned into place. The posterolateral and then medial-most anchors are secured and tied using arthroscopic knots, followed by sequential tying of the middle anchors. Any additional arthroscopic procedures, such as cam resection, are performed, and capsular/skin closure is performed using standard methods. Results: Published outcomes support reconstruction of the labrum using allograft, with 2 series consisting of a total of 141 segmental/circumferential reconstructions demonstrating similar outcome scores at 2 years of follow-up as compared to matched cases of primary labral repairs. Discussion/Conclusion: Hip segmental labral reconstruction with tibialis anterior allograft provides a viable surgical option for patients with labral defects precluding primary labral repair. The presented material demonstrates a readily employable technique as well as clear, step-by-step postoperative rehabilitation protocols, and satisfactory published short- and mid-term outcomes literature.