Search

The editorial discusses the concept of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) and the rapid dissemination of new technologies associated with it. The focus seems to be on the increasing use of smaller surgical incisions and complex gadgets, rather than the actual goals of spine surgery, such as safe decompression and stable reconstruction. The article acknowledges the benefits and opportunities that MISS offers, but also highlights some common themes and complications observed in MISS-treated patients. It emphasizes the need for ongoing learning and improvement in the field, and cautions against assuming that less invasive access technology should be the new standard of care for all degenerative conditions. The article concludes by discussing the three E's of spine surgery: efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency, and suggests that MISS is currently in the efficiency phase but has not yet become a new standard of care. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) experience abnormal spinopelvic motion due to chronic inflammation of the axial skeleton, predisposing them to impingement and dislocation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation rates in AS patients and evaluate the effects of age and gender on dislocation risk. Methods: Patients who underwent primary THA from 2005 to 2014 were identified using the PearlDiver database. AS patients were compared to age- and gender-matched controls without AS. Patients with a history of spine pathology or spine surgery were excluded. Univariate analyses were performed based on age and sex to evaluate dislocation rates at 90 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years postoperatively. Results: A total of 2792 THA patients (59.6% male) with AS were identified and compared to an age- and gender-matched control group of 5582 THA patients (59.5% male) without AS or known spine pathology. At final follow-up, there were 96 dislocations (3.4%) in the AS group and 138 (2.5%) dislocations in the control group (OR 1.40; 95% CI, 1.08–1.83; p = 0.0118). AS patients ⩾70 years old had higher dislocation rates at all time points (OR range, 1.75–2.09; p < 0.05) compared to controls. At 5-year follow-up, dislocation-free survivorship was 95.7% (95% CI, 94.5–96.9%) for AS patients ⩾70 years old compared to 97.3% (95% CI, 96.6–98.0%) for patients ⩾70 years old without AS. Conclusions: Older AS patients have higher dislocation rates following THA. This effect is likely related to decreased spinopelvic motion in the sagittal plane, predisposing patients to impinge and dislocate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective National Database Study Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the national trend of lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) utilization from 2005 to 2017. Methods: Patients undergoing primary LDA between 2005 and 2017 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Year of the procedure, demographic, socioeconomic, hospital, and cost parameters were analyzed. The data was weighted using provided weights from the NIS database to generate national estimates of LDA procedure incidence. Lastly, we assessed the incidence of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) between 2005 and 2017 to serve as a historical comparison. Results: An estimated 20 460 patients underwent primary LDA in the United States between 2005 and 2017. There was an initial decrease in LDA procedures between 2005 and 2006 and then a plateau between 2006 and 2009. From 2010 to 2013, there was a significant year-over-year decrease in annual LDA procedures performed, followed by a second plateau from 2014 to 2017. Overall, LDA procedures decreased 82% from 2005 to 2017. Over the same time, the annual incidence of CDA utilization increased 795% from approximately 474 procedures in 2005 to 4245 procedures in 2017 (P <.01). Conclusions: Lumbar disc arthroplasty utilization decreased 82% from 2005 to 2017, with a significant decrease in the rate of utilization noted after 2010. The utilization of LDA to treat selected degenerative lumbar conditions has not paralleled the increasing popularity of CDA, and, in fact, has demonstrated a nearly opposite utilization trend. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Narrative review. Objectives: The purpose of this review is to outline the role of sex hormones, particularly estrogen, in the pathogenesis of degenerative disc disease (DDD). Methods: A narrative review of studies discussing sex hormones and intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration was conducted through a search of bibliographic databases to identify various mechanisms involved in effectuating DDD. Results: Estrogen-deficient states negatively impact various aspects of IVD function. These internal hormone environments reflect routine changes that commonly arise with physiologic aging and can compromise IVD structural integrity through a host of processes. Additionally, allosteric molecules such as micro-RNAs (mi-RNAs) and G protein-coupled estrogen receptors (GPER) antagonists can bind to estrogen receptors and inhibit protective downstream effects with estrogen receptor signaling. Furthermore, cursory studies have observed chondrogenic effects with testosterone supplementation, although the specific mechanism remains unclear. Conclusions: Regulation of sex hormones, namely estrogen and testosterone, significantly impacts the structural integrity and function of IVDs. Uncovering underlying interactions driving these regulatory processes can facilitate development of novel, clinical therapies to treat DDD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has created an unprecedented global public health emergency. The aim of the current study was to report on COVID-19 rates in an asymptomatic population prior to undergoing spine procedures or surgeries at two large Los Angeles healthcare systems. Methods: Elective spine procedures and surgeries from May 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021 were included. Results from SARS-CoV-2 virus RT-PCR nasopharyngeal testing within 72 hours prior to elective spine procedures were recorded. Los Angeles County COVID-19 rates were calculated using data sets from Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. Chi-squared test and Stata/IC were used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 4,062 spine procedures and surgeries were scheduled during this time period. Of these, 4,043 procedures and surgeries were performed, with a total of 19 patients testing positive. Nine positive patients were from UCLA, and 10 from USC. The overall rate of positive tests was low at.47% and reflected similarities with Los Angeles County COVID-19 rates over time. Conclusions: The current study shows that pre-procedure COVID-19 testing rates remains very low, and follows similar patterns of community rates. While pre-procedure testing increases the safety of elective procedures, universal COVID-19 pre-screening adds an additional barrier to receiving care for patients and increases cost of delivering care. A combination of pre-screening, pre-procedure self-quarantine, and consideration of overall community COVID-19 positivity rates should be further studied. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: The impact of modifiable risk factors (MRFs) on complications, costs, and readmission rates at 30, 90, and 180-days following lumbar spine fusion. Methods: Patients with lumbar spine fusions within the 2016-2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). Patients were stratified by the following MRFs: Alcohol use, tobacco/nicotine use, nutritional malnourishment, dyslipidemia, and primary hypertension. Differences in complications, non-elective readmission rates, costs, and length of stay were compared between MRFs and the non-MRF group. Statistical analysis was conducted using Tukey multiple comparisons of means, 1-way ANOVA, Wald testing, unpaired Welch 2-sample t-tests, multivariate analysis, and predictive modeling. Results: The final analysis included 297,579 lumbar fusion patients. At 30 and 90 days, patients with nutritional malnutrition, dyslipidemia, and primary hypertension had significantly greater readmission rates than patients without MRFs (all P < 0.01). At 180-days, all MRFs had significantly greater readmission rates than the non-MRF group (all P < 0.001). Dyslipidemia demonstrated significantly greater rates of myocardial infarction at 90 days compared to all groups (all P < 0.02). Nutritional malnutrition was associated with a significantly greater mortality rate than primary hypertension, non-MRF, and tobacco/nicotine use at 90 days (P <0.001) and only tobacco/nicotine use at 180 days (P =0.007). Predictive modeling showed increases of 0.77%, 1.70%, and 2.44% risk of readmission at 30, 90, and 180-days respectively per additional MRF (all P <0.001). Conclusions: These findings highlight the negative impact each MRF has on patients following lumbar spinal fusion. Further longitudinal research is necessary to comprehensively characterize the effects of various MRFs on spine surgery outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective upright MRI study. Objective: To validate the presence of positive and negative nerve root sedimentation signs on multi-positional MRI in the upright position and explore the relationship between negative nerve root sedimentation and gravity. Methods: T2-weighted axial multi-positional images in the upright position at the intervertebral disc levels from L1–L2 to L4–L5 in 141 patients with non-specific low back pain were retrospectively assessed. A positive sedimentation sign was defined as the absence of nerve root sedimentation or the absence of dorsal conglomeration of nerve roots within the dural sac. A negative sedimentation sign was defined as nerve root sedimentation dorsally or dorso-laterally like a horseshoe. Intra-and inter-observer reliability was evaluated. The relationship between sedimentation sign and dural sac cross-sectional area (CSA), anterior-posterior (AP) diameter was also explored. Results: The kappa value of intra-observer reliability was 0.962 and inter-observer reliability was 0.925. Both positive and negative sedimentation signs did appear at all 4 lumbar levels, including L1/2, L2/3, L3/4 and L4/5. A positive sedimentation sign was associated with significantly decreased dural sac CSA and AP diameter at L2/3, L3/4 or L4/5 level when compared to negative sedimentation sign. Conclusions: Both negative and positive sedimentation signs appeared at the L1/2, L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 levels on the upright MRI, which suggested that the presence of nerve roots sedimenting dorsally in patients may not be associated with gravity. Moreover, the current study supports that sedimentation signs on multi-positional MRI images could have the same diagnostic functions as on MRI images. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective comparative study. Objectives: To compare the perioperative complications of propensity score-matched cohorts of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), who were treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior laminectomy with fusion, or laminoplasty. Methods: The Humana PearlDiver Patient Record Database was queried using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 and ICD-10) and the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Propensity score-matched analysis was done using multiple Chi-squared tests with Bonferroni correction of the significance level. Results: Cohorts of 11,790 patients who had ACDF, 2,257 patients who had posterior laminectomy with fusion, and 477 patients who had laminoplasty, were identified. After propensity score matching, all the 3 groups included 464 patients. The incidence of dysphagia increased significantly following ACDF compared to laminoplasty, P < 0.001, and in laminectomy with fusion compared to laminoplasty, P < 0.001. The incidence of new-onset cervicalgia was higher in ACDF compared to laminoplasty, P = 0.005, and in laminectomy with fusion compared to laminoplasty, P = 0.004. The incidence of limb paralysis increased significantly in laminectomy with fusion compared to ACDF, P = 0.002. The revision rate at 1 year increased significantly in laminectomy with fusion compared to laminoplasty, P < 0.001, and in ACDF compared to laminoplasty, P < 0.001. Conclusions: The incidence of dysphagia following laminectomy with fusion was not different compared to ACDF. Postoperative new-onset cervicalgia and revisions were least common in laminoplasty. The highest rate of postoperative limb paralysis was noticed in laminectomy with fusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Objectives: To determine if pre-operative albumin and CRP can predict post-operative infections after lumbar surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), or lumbar discectomy were identified using a patient record database (PearlDiver) and were included in this retrospective study. Patients were stratified by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores and pre-operative albumin and CRP status. Post-operative complications included deep infections and urinary tract infections within 3 months of the surgery and revisions within 1 year of the surgery. Results: 74,280 patients were included in this study. 21,903 had pre-operative albumin or CRP lab values. 7,191 (33%), 12,183 (56%), and 2,529 (12%) patients underwent an ALIF, PLIF, and a lumbar discectomy, respectively. 16,191 did not have any complication (74%). The most common complication was UTI (16%). Among all patients, hypoalbuminemia was a significant risk factor for deep infection and UTI after ALIF, deep infection, UTI, and surgical revision after PLIF, and deep infection after lumbar discectomy. Elevated CRP was a significant risk factor for deep infection after ALIF, UTI after PLIF, and deep infection after lumbar discectomy in patients with a CCI ≤ 3. Conclusions: Pre-operative hypoalbuminemia and elevated CRP were significant risk factors for deep infection, UTI, and/or revision, after ALIF, PLIT, and/or lumbar discectomy. Future studies with a larger population of patients with low albumin and high CRP values are needed to further elaborate on the current findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official journal of AO Spine International and is associated with the annual Global Spine Congress. The congress is an international meeting that travels to different locations around the world, with the most recent meeting taking place in Bangkok, Thailand. The congress was successful, with nearly 2000 participants and industry sponsors gathering to exchange ideas and research on spinal disorders. The GSJ announced its annual awards at the meeting and held sessions such as a journal club and a symposium in collaboration with Neurospine. The GSJ also had its annual board meeting, where new partnerships and strategies were discussed, including a collaboration with AO Spine Knowledge Forums to provide concise summaries of the latest research. [Extracted from the article]

The Global Spine Congress (GSC) 2024 is an annual congress organized by AO Spine that will take place in Bangkok, Asia. The congress aims to bring together spine surgeons from around the world to exchange ideas, network, and learn about the latest research and techniques in spine surgery. The event will feature various sessions, including pre-courses, symposia, and presentations of peer-reviewed abstracts. The abstracts accepted for presentation at the congress are published in a special online issue of the Global Spine Journal. The congress is open to surgeons, spine practitioners, healthcare professionals, and researchers. [Extracted from the article]

The editorial reflects on the accomplishments of the Global Spine Journal in 2023 and expresses gratitude towards the managing editor, volunteers, authors, publisher, and readership. The managing editor's absence during maternity leave highlighted her critical role in the journal's growth and development. The editorial board and reviewers are commended for their dedication and commitment to reviewing manuscripts. The journal expresses appreciation for authors who choose to submit their research and studies. The publisher, Sage, is acknowledged as a loyal and valuable partner. The journal aims to provide valuable information to readers to aid in clinical decisions, teaching, and understanding of spinal disorders. [Extracted from the article]

The article discusses the term "non-specific low back pain" and its implications in the field of spine care. It argues that the term is overly simplistic and outdated, as it suggests that there is no known reason for a patient's symptoms. The article highlights the multifactorial nature of back pain and the importance of considering various factors, such as muscular and psychological components, in diagnosis and treatment. It calls for a more precise approach to diagnosing and treating back pain, rather than relying on the vague label of "non-specific." [Extracted from the article]

Study Design: Methodological study for guideline development. Objective: AO Spine Guideline for Using Osteobiologics (AO-GO) project for spine degenerative pathologies was an international, multidisciplinary collaborative initiative to identify and evaluate evidence on existing use of osteobiologics in Anterior Cervical Fusion and Decompression (ACDF). The aim was to formulate precisely defined, clinically relevant and internationally applicable guidelines ensuring evidence-based, safe and effective use of osteobiologics, considering regional preferences and cost-effectiveness. Methods: Guideline was completed in two phases: Phase 1- evidence synthesis; Phase 2- recommendation development based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. In Phase 1, key questions identified by a panel of experts were addressed in a series of systematic reviews of randomized and non-randomized studies. In Phase 2, the GRADE approach was used to formulate a series of recommendations, including expert panel discussions via web calls and face-to-face meetings. Discussion: AO-GO aims to bridge an important gap between evidence and use of osteobiologics in spine fusion surgeries. Owing to differences in osteobiologics preparation and functional characteristics, regulatory requirements for approval may vary, therefore it is highly likely that these products enter market without quality clinical trials. With a holistic approach the guideline aims to facilitate evidence-based, patient-oriented decision-making processes in clinical practice, thus stimulating further evidence-based studies regarding osteobiologics usage in spine surgeries. In Phase 3, the guideline will be disseminated and validated using prospectively collected clinical data in a separate effort of the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative in a global multicenter clinical study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design: Systematic review. Objectives: The aim of this study is to analyze the complications related to multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using osteobiologics other than bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The search to identify studies reporting complications in multilevel ACDF surgery using osteobiologics other than bone morphogenetic protein was performed in August 2020. The study was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). Results: A total of 584 articles were found after searching the databases and removing duplicates. Next, screening was performed in a double reviewer process, and 153 eligible articles—with 4 retrospective studies—in full-text were selected; these met all inclusion criteria. A total of 197 patients received 3-level ACDF, while 72 patients received 4-level ACDF. Osteobiologics were used in all selected articles, allograft was used in 4 studies, autologous bone graft was utilized in 3 articles, and hydroxyapatite was used in 1 article. The main complications reported were dysphagia, adjacent segment disease, and pseudarthrosis. Conclusions: Given the limited evidence, no conclusions on complications in multilevel ACDF using osteobiologics other than BMP could be made. However, descriptively, the most common complications found were dysphagia, adjacent segment disease, and pseudoarthrosis. Further prospective studies separately analyzing complications in multilevel ACDF by osteobiologics and a number of treated levels are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design: Systematic Review of the Literature. Objective: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review describing fusion rates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using autograft vs various interbody devices augmented with different osteobiologic materials. Methods: A systematic review limited to the English language was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane library using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms. Studies that evaluated fusion after ACDF using autografts and osteobiologics combined with PEEK, carbon fibre, or metal cages were searched for. Articles in full text that met the criteria were included in the review. The main outcomes evaluated were the time taken to merge, the definition of the fusion assessment, and the modality of the fusion assessment. The risk of bias of each article was assessed by the MINORS score or ROB 2.0 depending on the randomisation process. Results: The total number of references reviewed was six hundred and eighty-two. After applying the inclusion criteria, 54 were selected for the retrieval of the full text. Eight studies were selected and included for final analysis in this study. Fusion rates were reported between 83.3% and 100% for autograft groups compared to 46.5% and 100% for various interbody device/osteobiological combinations. The overall quality of the evidence in all radiographic fusion studies was considered insufficient due to a serious risk of bias. Conclusion: Mechanical interbody devices augmented with osteobiologics performed similarly to autografts in terms of reliability and efficacy. Their time to fusion and fusion rate were comparable to autografts at the end of the final follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Network meta-analysis. Objectives: To compare the fusion outcome and complications of different 1 or 2-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) constructs performed with and without the application of autografts. Methods: We performed an independent and duplicate search in electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus for relevant articles published between 2000 and 2020. We included comparative studies reporting fusion rate and complications with and without the use of autografts in ACDF across 5 different fusion constructs. A network meta-analysis was performed in Stata, categorized based on the type of fusion constructs utilized. Fusion constructs were ranked based on p-score approach and surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) scores. The confidence of results from the analysis was appraised with Cochrane's CINeMA approach. Results: A total of 2216 patients from 22-studies including 6 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and 16 non-RCTs were included in network analysis. The mean age of included patients was 49.3 (±3.62) years. Based on our meta-analysis, we could conclude that use of autograft in 1- or 2-level ACDF did not affect the fusion and mechanical implant-related complications. The final fusion and mechanical complication rates were also not significantly different across the different fusion constructs. The use of plated constructs was associated with a significant increase in post-ACDF dysphagia rates [OR 3.42; 95%CI (.01,2.45)], as compared to stand-alone constructs analysed. Conclusion: The choice of fusion constructs and use of autografts does not significantly affect the fusion and overall complication rates following 1 or 2-level ACDF surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Systematic literature review Objective: To critically analyze the literature and describe the complications associated with the use of allograft in 1- or 2- level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted for literature published between January 2000 and August 2020 reporting complications associated with the use of allograft in 1- or 2- level ACDF. Results: From 584 potentially relevant citations, 21 met the inclusion criteria (4 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 4 prospective, and 13 retrospective studies). The patient number varied between 26 and 463 in comparative studies (RCT and non-RCT) and between 29 and 345 in non-comparative studies. Fusion rate was reported in 14 studies and ranged between 68.5-100%. The most frequently reported complication was post-operative dysphagia or dysphonia, with incidences ranging between.5% and 14.4%. Revision surgery was the second most reported complication (14 studies) and ranged between 0% and 10.3%. Wound-related complications were reported in 6 studies and ranged between 0% and 22.8%. Conclusion: The overall reporting of complications was low with very few comparative studies. Reported complications with allografts are within the range of other osteobiologics and autografts and in most cases may not attributable to the use of osteobiologics and may be complications of the procedure itself. Comparative studies with a more robust methodology analyzing complications with allograft and other osteobiologics are needed to inform current practice with strong recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Systematic Literature Review Objective: Perform a systematic review evaluating postoperative fusion rates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using structural allograft vs various interbody devices augmented with different osteobiologic materials. Methods: Comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed. Included studies were those that reported results of 1–4 levels ACDF using pure structural allograft compared with a mechanical interbody device augmented with an osteobiologic. Excluded studies were those that reported on ACDF with cervical corpectomy; anterior and posterior cervical fusions; circumferential (360° or 540°) fusion or revision ACDF for nonunion or other conditions. Risk of bias was determined using the Cochrane review guidelines. Results: 8 articles reporting fusion rates of structural allograft and an interbody device/osteobiologic pair were included. All included studies compared fusion rates following ACDF among structural allograft vs non-allograft interbody device/osteobiologic pairs. Fusion rates were reported between 84% and 100% for structural allograft, while fusion rates for various interbody device/osteobiologic combinations ranged from 26% to 100%. Among non-allograft cage groups fusion rates varied from 73-100%. One study found PEEK cages filled with combinations of autograft, allograft, and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) to have an overall fusion rate of 26%. In one study comparing plate and zero-profile constructs, there was no difference in fusion rates for two-level fusions. Conclusion: There was limited data comparing fusion outcomes of patients undergoing ACDF using structural allograft vs interbody devices augmented with osteobiologic materials to support superiority of one method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Systematic literature review. Objectives: To analyze the evidence available reporting complications in single or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a demineralized bone matrix (DBM), hydroxyapatite (HA), or beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP). Methods: A systematic review of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed in August 2020 to identify studies reporting complications in one or two-level ACDF surgery using DBM, HA, or β-TCP. The study was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: A total of 1857 patients were included, 981 male and 876 female, across 17 articles; 5 prospective, and 12 retrospectives. We noted heterogeneity among the included studies concerning the study design and combination of graft materials utilized in them. However, we noted a higher incidence of adjacent segment disease (17.7%) and pseudoarthrosis (9.3%) in fusion constructs using DBM. Studies using β-TCP reported a higher incidence of pseudoarthrosis (28.2%) and implant failures (17.9%). Conclusions: Degenerative cervical conditions treated with one or two-level ACDF surgery using DBM, HA, or β-TCP with or without cervical plating are associated with complications such as adjacent segment disease, dysphagia, and pseudarthrosis. However, consequent to the study designs and clinical heterogeneity of the studies, it is not possible to correlate these complications accurately with any specific graft material employed. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed to correctly know the related morbidity of each graft used for achieving fusion in ACDF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as complications of unplated vs plated anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery considering the role of osteobiologics in single- and multi-level procedures. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed. Briefly, we sought to identify studies comparing unplated vs. plated ACDF for cervical degenerative disc disease reporting the use of osteobiologics in terms of clinical outcomes, radiographic fusion, and complications. Data on study population, follow-up time, type of cage and plate used, type of osteobiologic employed, number of levels treated, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), radiographic outcomes and complications were collected and compared. Relevant information was pooled for meta-analyses. Results: Thirty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was found in terms of clinical outcomes between groups. Unplated ACDF was characterized by reduced blood loss, operation time and length of hospital stay. Fusion was achieved by the majority of patients in both groups, with no evidence of any specific contribution depending on the osteobiologics used. Dysphagia was more commonly associated with anterior plating, while cage subsidence prevailed in the unplated group. Conclusion: Unplated and plated ACDF seem to provide similar outcomes irrespective of the osteobiologic used, with minor differences with doubtful clinical significance. However, the heterogeneity and high risk of bias affecting included studies markedly prevent significant conclusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: The study's primary objective was to determine how osteobiologic choice affects fusion rates in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The study's secondary objectives were to 1) determine the optimal timing of fusion assessment following ACDF and 2) determine if osteobiologic type affects the timing and optimal modality of fusion assessment. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE was conducted for literature published from 2000 through October 2020 comparing anterior fusion in the cervical spine with various osteobiologics. Both comparative studies and case series of ≥10 patients were included. Results: A total of 74 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies evaluated the efficacy of autograft on fusion outcomes, and 23 studies assessed the efficacy of allograft on fusion outcomes. 3 studies evaluated the efficacy of demineralized bone matrix, and seven assessed the efficacy of rhBMP-2 on fusion outcomes. Other limited studies evaluated the efficacy of ceramics and bioactive glasses on fusion outcomes, and 4 assessed the efficacy of stem cell products. Most studies utilized dynamic radiographs for the assessment of fusion. Overall, there was a general lack of supportive data to determine the optimal timing of fusion assessment meaningfully or if osteobiologic type influenced fusion timing. Conclusions: Achieving fusion following ACDF appears to remain an intricate interplay between host biology and various surgical factors, including the selection of osteobiologics. While alternative osteobiologics to autograft exist and may produce acceptable fusion rates, limitations in study methodology prevent any definitive conclusions from existing literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Systematic review Objective: Examine the clinical evidence for the use of osteobiologics in hybrid surgery (combined anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and total disc replacement (TDR)) in patients with multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD). Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched between January 2000 and August 2020. Clinical studies investigating 18-80 year old patients with multilevel cervical DDD who underwent hybrid surgery with or without the use of osteobiologics were considered eligible. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed the identified articles. The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) tool and the risk of bias (RoB 2.0) assessment tool were used to assess risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to evaluate quality of evidence across studies per outcome. Results: Eleven studies were included. A decrease in cervical range of motion was observed in most studies for both the hybrid surgery and the control groups consisting of stand-alone ACDF or TDR. Fusion rates of 70-100% were reported in both the hybrid surgery and control groups consisting of stand-alone ACDF. The hybrid surgery group performed better or comparable to the control group in terms of adjacent segment degeneration. Studies reported an improvement in visual analogue scale for pain and neck disability index values after surgery compared to preoperative scores for both treatment groups. The included studies had moderate methodological quality. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence for assessing the use of osteobiologics in multilevel hybrid surgery and additional high quality and controlled research is deemed essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report trends, complications, and costs associated with endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). Methods: Using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, patients who had open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release (CTR) were identified retrospectively in the PearlDiver database from both the Medicare and Humana (a private payer health insurance) populations from 2005 to 2014. These groups were then evaluated for postoperative complications, including wound infection within 90 days, wound dehiscence within 90 days, and intraoperative median nerve injury. We also used the data output for each group to compare the cost of the 2 procedure types. Data were analyzed via the Student t test. Statistical significance was set at P <.05. Results: A significantly lower percentage of patients in the endoscopic CTR group had a postoperative infection (5.21 vs 7.97 per 1000 patients per year, P <.001; 7.36 vs 11.23 per 1000 patients per year, P <.001) and wound dehiscence (1.58 vs 2.87 per 1000 patients per year, P <.001; 2.14 vs 3.73 per 1000 patients per year, P <.05) than open CTR group in the Medicare and Humana populations, respectively. Median nerve injury occurred 0.59/1000 ECTRs versus 1.69/1000 OCTRs (Medicare) and 1.96/1000 ECTRs versus 3.72/1000 OCTRs (Humana). Endoscopic CTR cost was more than open CTR for both the Medicare population ($1643 vs $1015 per procedure, P <.001) and Humana population ($1928 vs $1191 per procedure, P <.001). Conclusions: In both the Medicare and private insurance patient populations, endoscopic CTR is associated with fewer postoperative complications than open CTR, but is associated with greater expenses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]