Search

This year, Acta Radiologica marks its 100th anniversary. In this article, the authors present some of the highlights from the close collaboration between Swedish neuroradiology and Acta Radiologica over the last 100 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The question has been raised whether low dose radiation toward the brain in childhood can affect cognitive functions. Purpose To examine if a head computed tomography (CT) examination in childhood affect later cognitive functions. Material and Methods A total of 147 participants (67 girls/women, 80 boys/men) from a previous randomized controlled trial on management strategies after mild head injury (head CT examination or in-hospital observation) were followed up. Participants were aged 6-16 years (mean age = 11.2 ± 2.8) at first inclusion and 11-24 years (mean age = 17.8 ± 2.9) at follow-up. Computerized neuropsychological measures used for the assessment were motor speed and coordination, reaction time, selective attention, visuospatial ability, verbal and non-verbal short-term and long-term memory, and executive function tests from the neurocognitive test battery EuroCog and the Wechsler Memory Scale III. Results were analyzed with Student's t-tests and multivariate analyses adjusting for sex, age at time of injury/exposure, and age at assessment were performed with Factorial ANOVAs. Results The exposed and unexposed groups did not differ in any of the neuropsychological measures and results did not change when sex, age at time of injury/exposure, and age at assessment were included in the analyses. Conclusion A head CT examination at the age of 6-16 years does not seem to affect later cognitive functions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anterior dynamic ultrasound of the infant hip has been shown to be a valuable tool for detection of developmental dysplasia of the infant hip, but to what extent the results from this method depends on the investigator is unknown. Purpose: To study to what extent the proportion of positive findings at anterior dynamic ultrasound investigation of infant hips varies with the observer. Material and Methods: Information on all ultrasound investigations of infant hips at a county hospital between January 2004 and August 2007 was evaluated. Proportion of findings for different investigators were calculated and in a multivariable logistic regression analysis, risk of treatment by investigating orthopedic surgeon and radiologist were adjusted for each other as well as for calendar period and infant sex. Results: There was a striking variation in proportion of positive findings depending on the investigator. The proportion of infants treated varied with orthopedic surgeon from 4.2 to 53.9% (95% CI: 2.27 to 7.13 and 43.0 to 64.6, respectively) and the corresponding variation for radiologists ranged from 7.4 (95% CI: 4.29 to 11.8) to 23.9% (95% CI: 17.2 to 31.8). In the adjusted analysis, variation between different investigators remained essentially unaltered. Conclusion: Although the true proportions of positive findings in our study are unknown, our findings are unlikely to be explained by selection bias or chance. Thus, our study suggests that anterior dynamic ultrasound of the infant hip is highly dependent on the investigator and further studies of the implications of our results are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]