Search

Background: Both superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and middle trapezius tendon (MTT) transfer can be performed in nonarthritic young and active patients with isolated irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears (IISTTs). However, to our knowledge, no comparative clinical studies have been conducted on these procedures. Purpose: To evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of SCR and arthroscopic-assisted MTT transfer in patients with IISTTs. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 60 patients with IISTTs were categorized into 2 groups according to the surgical procedure—Group S underwent SCR (n = 34); Group M underwent MTT transfer (n = 26). The clinical outcomes included the visual analog scale score for pain, active shoulder range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and University of California, Los Angeles, shoulder score. Radiological outcomes included the assessment of the acromiohumeral distance, progression of cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada grade), subacromial bone erosion, and graft failure. Results: The mean follow-up time was 39.3 ± 5.2 months (range, 26-59 months) and 37.6 ± 9.8 months (range, 27-54 months) in Group S and Group M, respectively. Significant improvements in clinical outcomes were observed in both groups, while the active forward flexion (148.2°± 24.1° vs 165.9°± 8.7°; P =.003) and abduction (131°± 37.3° vs 152.5°± 17.9°; P =.035) were significantly higher in Group M at the final follow-up. No significant differences were found in the postoperative Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and University of California, Los Angeles, shoulder scores between the 2 groups. Radiologically, although no difference was found in the Hamada grade at the final follow-up between the 2 groups (P =.143), the rates of acromial wear (58.8% vs 15.4%; P <.001) and graft retear (47.1% vs 7.7%; P <.001) were significantly higher in Group S than in Group M. Conclusion: Both SCR and MTT transfer improved the overall clinical outcomes of IISTTs postoperatively, whereas MTT transfer was superior to SCR in terms of active forward flexion and abduction range of motion. Although higher rates of graft failure and subacromial bone erosion were observed in Group S, no difference was found in the clinical scores between the 2 groups at the short-term follow-up. However, further well-structured, prolonged comparative trials should be conducted in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Irreparable rotator cuff tears represent approximately 12% of all presenting cuff tears, and multiple surgical techniques have been described for treatment, including allograft/bridge augmentation, debridement, partial repair, subacromial balloon, tendon transfer, and superior capsule reconstruction (SCR). SCR has demonstrated durable improvement in range of motion (ROM) and outcome scores at 2 and 5 years. Indications: Surgical indications for SCR include an irreparable tear of the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus with a preserved or reparable subscapularis and preserved glenohumeral joint cartilage. Technique Description: Diagnostic arthroscopy is performed to identify and characterize the rotator cuff tear. Thorough debridement of the greater tuberosity is performed. Two all-suture FiberTak anchors are placed in the superior aspect of the glenoid. Two 2.6-mm FiberTak suture anchors are placed in the humeral head at the chondral margin. After measuring, the dermal allograft is cut to size with 15-mm overhang left on the far lateral edge. A 12-mm passport cannula is inserted laterally and the sutures from the glenoid and humeral head anchors are brought out through the cannula maintaining their position and orientation. The sutures are passed through the graft outside the cannula. The graft is introduced into the shoulder via the passport cannula with a back grasper. A cannula-in-cannula technique is used to tie the glenoid anchors first and then the medial row anchors. Two lateral row swivel lock anchors are used to complete a standard double row repair. Margin convergence is performed between the dermal allograft and remaining rotator cuff anterior and posterior. Postoperatively, patients are kept in a sling for 6 weeks, with no shoulder ROM. From weeks 6 to 12, patients discontinue sling and begin passive progression to active ROM. Strengthening is initiated at 12 weeks, and return-to-sport or work is at approximately 6 months. Results: Irreparable rotator cuff tears treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and SCR show durable improvement in patient-reported outcomes at 2 and 5 years. Re-tear rates did not differ between athletes and non-athletes. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with SCR is a durable and reliable surgical option for patients presenting with preserved glenohumeral joint and irreparable supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tear. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR), arthroscopic partial repair (PR), and arthroscopic debridement (DB) are valid treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic SCR with arthroscopic PR and arthroscopic DB in patients with irreparable posterosuperior RC tears. It was hypothesized that SCR would lead to superior clinical and functional outcomes compared with PR or DB. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Clinical and functional outcomes of this single-center retrospective study included range of motion, strength, and the age- and sex-adjusted Constant-Murley score. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) involved the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, the Subjective Shoulder Value, and the visual analog scale for pain. Graft and repaired tendon integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months of follow-up. Results: In total, 57 patients treated with SCR (n = 20), PR (n = 17), and DB (n = 20) were included. The mean clinical follow-up was 33.8 ± 17.9 months. Preoperative clinical and functional characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups. The range of motion and clinical and functional scores of all 3 groups significantly improved from pre- to postoperatively. Postoperative PROMs showed no differences among all 3 study groups. SCR revealed significantly higher postoperative strength compared with PR (P =.001) and DB (P =.004). Postoperative MRI revealed a rerupture in 4 patients with SCR (20%). Postoperative MRI showed a rerupture in 9 patients with PR (53%). Fatty muscle infiltration of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus significantly progressed within all 3 study groups in postoperative MRI scans. No clinical and functional differences were observed between intact and reruptured PR. Conclusion: Patients who underwent SCR had better postoperative strength recovery than patients who underwent PR or DB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recently, a polypropylene mesh has been introduced and reported to improve clinical outcomes after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using a fascia lata autograft (FLA). However, mesh-related events such as a foreign body response may trigger inflammation, which might affect graft healing and remodeling. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim was to investigate whether the healing and remodeling of an FLA were affected by the use of a mesh by comparing the signal intensity of an FLA-alone group vs an FLA + Mesh group on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The hypothesis was that the use of a mesh would decrease the MRI signal intensity of FLA during the early postoperative phase. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who had undergone SCR using an FLA with or without a mesh between March 2013 and August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up MRI was performed at 3 months. A total of 78 patients (24 in the FLA group and 54 in the FLA + Mesh group) with intact grafts were included. Graft remodeling was evaluated by analyzing the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) at the humeral, mid-substance, and glenoid sites. Theoretically, lower SNQ ratios indicate higher strength and better healing of the graft. Results: The mean SNQ was 30.603 (range, 11.790-72.710) in the FLA group and 18.367 (range, 4.464-69.500) in the FLA + Mesh group (P <.001). Furthermore, significant differences were found between the 2 groups at the humeral and mid-substance sites (37.863 [range, 5.092-81.187] vs 15.512 [range, 1.814-80.869], P <.001; and 29.168 [range, 6.103-73.900] vs 16.878 [range, 2.454-92.416], P =.003; respectively). However, there was no difference between the 2 groups at the glenoid site (25.346 [range, 7.565-86.353] vs 20.354 [range, 3.732-88.468], P =.057). Conclusion: At the 3-month follow-up, the FLA + Mesh group showed a lower MRI signal intensity than the FLA group. The healing and remodeling of an FLA may be enhanced when a mesh is used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) is an option for the treatment of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, which materials yield the strongest constructs remains undetermined. Purposes: We sought to investigate whether SCR with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or human dermal allograft (HDA), 2 or 3 glenoid anchors, and suture or minitape resulted in better failure load properties at the patch-glenoid interface. Methods: We conducted a biomechanical study in 30 glenoid-sided SCR repairs in Sawbones models divided into 5 groups. Each was pulled to failure to assess mode of failure, peak load (N), stiffness (N/mm), yield load (N), peak energy (N m), and ultimate energy (N m). The 5 groups were as follows: group 1—PTFE, 2 anchors, and suture; group 2—PTFE, 2 anchors, and minitape; group 3—HDA, 2 anchors, and suture; group 4—HDA, 2 anchors, and minitape; group 5—PTFE, 3 anchors, and minitape. Results: Repairs failed by button-holing of suture/minitape. Group 5 had greater peak load, stiffness, yield load, and peak energy (384 ± 62 N; 24 ± 3 N/mm; 343 ± 42 N; 4 ± 2 N m) than group 3 (226 ± 67 N; 16 ± 4 N/mm; 194 ± 74 N; 2 ± 1 N m) or group 4 (274 ± 62 N; 17 ± 4 N/mm; 244 ± 50 N; 2 ± 1 N m) and greater ultimate energy (8 ± 3 N m) than all other groups. Conclusions: This biomechanical study of SCR repairs in Sawbones models found that yield load was greater in PTFE than HDA, 3 anchors were better than 2, and minitape was no better than suture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Middle trapezius tendon (MTT) transfer has been described for dynamic reproduction of supraspinatus function. For management of irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears, this procedure can be coupled with in situ (long head of the biceps tendon–based) superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and partial RC repair. Purpose: To investigate the functional outcomes of augmentation of in situ SCR–reinforced partial RC repair with MTT transfer for the management of irreparable posterosuperior RC tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Conducted between September 2014 and March 2022, this study included 24 patients with irreparable posterosuperior RC tears who were allocated into 2 groups: patients managed with 2-layer tendon construct (in situ SCR–reinforced partial RC repair) (group A; n = 15) and patients managed with 3-layer tendon construct (MTT transfer–augmented, in situ SCR–reinforced partial RC repair) (group B; n = 9). Outcome measures included 2-year postoperative pain, range of motion (ROM) in forward flexion and external rotation, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores. For data comparison, independent and paired t tests were used for parametric quantitative variables, and Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for nonparametric quantitative variables; Fisher exact and McNemar tests were used for qualitative variables. Results: The mean age of the patients was 58.40 ± 4.54 years in group A and 59.22 ± 4.46 years in group B; there were no between-group differences in baseline patient characteristics. Patients in both groups had significant preoperative to postoperative improvement on all outcome measures (P <.05 for all). Group B had a significantly higher magnitude of postoperative improvement compared with group A in forward flexion ROM (88.88° ± 29.34° vs 46.66° ± 20.93°; P =.001), external rotation ROM (32.22° ± 14.81° vs 16.0° ± 9.10°; P =.002), ASES score (71.07 ± 8.26 vs 57.87 ± 8.39; P =.001), and QuickDASH score (–70.20 ± 6.95 vs –58.34 ± 12.52; P =.007). Conclusion: Augmentation of in situ SCR–reinforced partial RC repair with MTT transfer in a 3-layer tendon construct led to significantly greater improvement in postoperative ROM and functional scores compared with a 2-layer construct. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) was developed as an alternative treatment for irreparable rotator cuff tears to restore superior stability of the glenohumeral joint. Although fatty infiltration (FI) of the rotator cuff muscles, especially the infraspinatus, has been implicated as a predictor of outcomes and graft integrity after rotator cuff repair, it has not been fully investigated in cases of SCR. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of FI of the infraspinatus muscle on clinical and radiological outcomes after SCR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 55 consecutive patients with irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears who underwent SCR between January 2013 and August 2020 were included retrospectively. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiological findings (median follow-up of >2 years), including magnetic resonance imaging results, were thoroughly reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 with mild FI of the infraspinatus (Goutallier grades 0-2) and group 2 with severe FI of the infraspinatus (Goutallier grades 3-4). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, visual analog scale score for pain, and range of motion were evaluated. Acromiohumeral distance and rotator cuff tear arthropathy using the Hamada classification were assessed on plain radiography. Postoperative graft integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Graft failure was defined as complete discontinuity. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate clinical and radiological findings that might be associated with successful SCR. Results: Clinical and radiological outcomes significantly improved after SCR. Graft failure was noted in 15 (27.3%) patients and was more frequent in group 2 than in group 1 (50.0% vs 14.3%, respectively; P =.004). Univariate analysis indicated a significant association between severe FI in the infraspinatus (group 2) and graft failure after SCR (odds ratio, 6.00 [95% CI, 1.65-21.80]; P =.006). Multivariable analysis indicated that FI of the infraspinatus was the only factor associated with graft failure (odds ratio, 6.37 [95% CI, 1.63-24.90]; P =.008). Conclusion: Severe FI of the infraspinatus muscle was a factor indicating a poor prognosis for graft integrity after SCR. Preoperative evaluation of FI in the rotator cuff muscles can help predict postoperative outcomes and may help guide therapeutic options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recently, the biceps was rerouted into a newly fabricated bicipital groove for in situ superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), resulting in promising time-zero cadaveric and clinical outcomes. However, no studies have determined the in vivo biomechanical and histological processes after the biceps is transposed to a nonanatomic position. Purpose: To explore the in vivo biomechanical and histological processes of the rerouting biceps tendon to treat chronic irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) in a rabbit model. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 94 skeletally mature male rabbits were used to create a chronic IRCT model in the supraspinatus tendon. Then, the biceps rerouting procedures were performed in rabbits with chronic IRCT. Eighteen rabbits were sacrificed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks postoperatively for biomechanical testing, micro—computed tomography scanning, and histological analysis. The biomechanical and histological changes of intra- and extra-articular portions of the rerouting biceps were evaluated at each time point, with the contralateral native superior capsule (NSC) and the native biceps (NB) as controls, respectively. The morphology and bone formation of the fabricated bicipital grooves were evaluated, with native grooves as controls. Results: The intra-articular rerouting biceps tendon was progressively remodeled over time, displaying denser fibers and more mature collagen than those of the NSC, with gradual improvements in the tendon-to-bone healing interface from 6 to 12 weeks. Consequently, the failure load and stiffness of the intra-articular rerouting biceps portion increased with time and were significantly higher than those of the NSC from 9 weeks. Similarly, the extra-articular portion of the rerouting biceps progressively healed into a new bicipital groove, as demonstrated by a smaller tendon-to-bone interface from 6 to 12 weeks, resulting in greater failure load and stiffness at 9 and 12 weeks than those of the NB attachment. The newly fabricated bicipital groove showed similar morphology to that of the native groove with sufficient trabecular bone formed underneath. Conclusion: The rerouting biceps could progressively remodel and heal into the newly fabricated bicipital groove over time, resulting in greater biomechanical performances in intra- and extra-articular portions than the NSC and the NB attachment. Clinical Relevance: The biceps rerouting technique may be a feasible procedure to perform in situ SCR to treat IRCT in the future clinical practice; however, more clinical evidence is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Interposition grafting (IG), also called bridging grafting, and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) are the most commonly used joint-preserving surgical methods for irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs). Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of IG versus SCR to treat patients with irreparable RCTs. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. Included in this review were clinical studies evaluating the effect of IG or SCR in patients with irreparable RCTs with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Various clinical results from the studies were extracted and compared between IG and SCR, and among them, the results of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, graft retear rate, and complication rate were included in the meta-analysis. Results: Of 1638 identified articles, 17 (10 studies of IG involving 321 patients and 7 studies of SCR involving 357 patients) were selected. Both surgical methods showed significantly improved clinical outcomes in all but 1 study; however, the IG group had lower pain visual analog scale score, higher Constant score, and bigger active forward flexion and internal rotation compared with the SCR group (all P <.001). The meta-analysis showed no difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score between groups (P =.44), but showed a significantly lower complication rate in the IG group compared with the SCR group (1.12% vs 8.37%, respectively; P <.001). The graft retear rate was not significantly different between groups (IG = 10.64% vs SCR = 12.67%; P =.79). The meta-analysis of graft type indicated no difference between groups in retear rate (autograft: 95% CI, 0.045-0.601; I 2 = 93.28 [IG], 91.27 [SCR]; P =.22; allograft: 95% CI, 0.041-0.216; I 2 = 80.39 [IG], 69.12 [SCR]; P =.64) or complication rate (autograft: 95% CI, 0.009-0.150; I 2 = 0 [IG], 65.89 [SCR]; P =.25; allograft: 95% CI, 0.012-0.081; I 2 = 0 [IG], 30.62 [SCR]; P =.09). Conclusion: Both IG and SCR techniques resulted in improvement in patients with irreparable RCTs. Meta-analysis showed a lower complication rate in the IG group; however, the lack of randomized studies limited our conclusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) has been shown to improve shoulder function and reduce pain in patients with isolated irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears. However, the effects of SCR on biomechanics in a shoulder with an extensive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear pattern remain unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to (1) establish a dynamic robotic shoulder model, (2) assess the influence of rotator cuff tear patterns, and (3) assess the effects of SCR on superior humeral head translation after a posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. It was hypothesized that a posterosuperior rotator cuff tear would increase superior humeral head translation when compared with the intact and supraspinatus tendon–deficient state and that SCR would reduce superior humeral head translation in shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using a robotic arm. Kinematic testing was performed in 4 conditions: (1) intact, (2) simulated irreparable supraspinatus tendon tear, (3) simulated irreparable supra- and infraspinatus tendon tear, and (4) SCR using a 3 mm–thick dermal allograft (DA). Kinematic testing consisted of static 40-N superior force tests at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of abduction and dynamic flexion, abduction, and scaption motions. In each test, the superior translation of the humeral head was reported. Results: In static testing, SCR significantly reduced humeral superior translation compared with rotator cuff tear at all abduction angles. SCR restored the superior stability back to native at 60° and 90° of abduction, but the humeral head remained significantly and superiorly translated at neutral position and at 30° of abduction. The results of dynamic testing showed a significantly increased superior translation in the injured state at lower elevation angles, which diminished at higher elevation, becoming nonsignificant at elevation >75°. SCR reduced the magnitude of superior translation across all elevation angles, but translation remained significantly different from the intact state up to 60° of elevation. Conclusion: Massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears increased superior glenohumeral translation when compared with the intact and supraspinatus tendon–insufficient rotator cuff states. SCR using a 3-mm DA partially restored the superior stability of the glenohumeral joint even in the presence of a simulated massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear in a static and dynamic robotic shoulder model. Clinical Relevance: The biomechanical performance concerning glenohumeral stability after SCR in shoulders with large posterosuperior rotator cuff tears is unclear and may affect clinical outcomes in daily practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the past decade, superior capsular reconstruction has emerged as a potential surgical approach in young patients with irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (RCT) and absence of severe degenerative changes. Recently, the use of locally available and biological viable autografts, such as the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) for SCR has emerged, with promising early results. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of using the LHBT for reconstruction of the superior capsule on shoulder kinematics, along with different fixation constructs in a dynamic biomechanical model. The authors hypothesized that each of the 3 proposed fixation techniques would restore native joint kinematics, including glenohumeral superior translation (ghST), maximum abduction angle (MAA), maximum cumulative deltoid force (cDF), and subacromial peak contact pressure (sCP). Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 53.4 ± 14.2 years) were tested using a dynamic shoulder simulator. Each specimen underwent the following 5 conditions: (1) intact, (2) irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear (psRCT), (3) V-shaped LHBT reconstruction, (4) box-shaped LHBT reconstruction, and (5) single-stranded LHBT reconstruction. MAA, ghST, cDF and sCP were assessed in each tested condition. Results: Each of the 3 LHBT techniques for reconstruction of the superior capsule significantly increased MAA while significantly decreasing ghST and cDF compared with the psRCT (P <.001 and P <.001, respectively). Additionally, the V-shaped and box-shaped techniques significantly decreased sCP (P =.009 and P =.016, respectively) compared with the psRCT. The V-shaped technique further showed a significantly increased MAA (P <.001, respectively) and decreased cDF (P =.042 and P =.039, respectively) when compared with the box-shaped and single-stranded techniques, as well as a significantly decreased ghST (P =.027) when compared with the box-shaped technique. Conclusion: In a dynamic biomechanical cadaveric model, using the LHBT for reconstruction of the superior capsule improved shoulder function by preventing superior humeral migration, decreasing deltoid forces and sCP. As such, the development of rotator cuff tear arthropathy in patients with irreparable psRCTs could potentially be delayed. Clinical Relevance: Using a biologically viable and locally available LHBT autograft is a cost-effective, potentially time-saving, and technically feasible alternative for reconstruction of the superior capsule, which may result in favorable outcomes in irreparable psRCTs. Moreover, each of the 3 techniques restored native shoulder biomechanics, which may help improve shoulder function by preventing superior humeral head migration and the development of rotator cuff tear arthropathy in young patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chronic pseudoparalysis is generally defined as the inability to actively elevate the arm above 90° with free passive range of motion and no neurological deficits. It has been suggested that this arbitrary cutoff needs to be refined. Purpose: To analyze whether there are structural and biomechanical differences in patients with chronic pseudoparalysis and those with chronic pseudoparesis. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: In this retrospective study, 50 patients with chronic massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs; ≥2 tendons) and free passive and active scapular plane abduction <90° were divided into 2 groups: pseudoparalysis group (n = 24; active scapular plane abduction, <45°) and pseudoparesis group (n = 26; active scapular plane abduction, >45° and <90°). Radiographic measurements included the critical shoulder angle, acromiohumeral distance, posterior acromial tilt, anterior and posterior acromial coverages, and posterior acromial height on outlet views. Measurements on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) included fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles, anterior (subscapularis) and posterior (infraspinatus/teres minor) tear extensions, and global (anterior + posterior) tear extension in the parasagittal plane. A published musculoskeletal model was used to simulate the effect of different mRCTs on the muscle force required for scapular plane abduction. Results: Plain radiographs revealed no differences between patients with chronic pseudoparalysis and those with pseudoparesis. MRI assessment showed significant differences between patients with chronic pseudoparalysis and those with pseudoparesis with respect to fatty infiltration of the subscapularis (2.9 vs 1.6; P <.001) and infraspinatus (3.6 vs 3.0; P <.001) muscles, and anterior (−23° vs 4°; P <.001), posterior (−23° vs −14°; P =.034), and global rotator cuff (225° vs 190°; P <.001) tear extensions. The anterior tear extension in patients with chronic pseudoparalysis always involved more than 50% of the subscapularis, which was associated with an odds ratio of 5 for inability to actively abduct more than 45°. The biomechanical model was unable to find a combination of muscles that could balance the arm in space when the tear extended beyond the supraspinatus and the cranial subscapularis. Conclusion: This study confirms that chronic pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis are associated with different structural lesions. In the setting of a chronic mRCT, involvement of more than 50% of the subscapularis tendon with fatty infiltration of stage 3 is associated with pseudoparalysis of active scapular plane abduction <45°. The key function of the subscapularis was confirmed in the biomechanical model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) is an alternative to open surgery for irreparable chronic rotator cuff tears (RCTs). This approach can provide static restraint while avoiding upward migration of the humeral head. However, graft tears and their effect on clinical outcomes after ASCR remain a debated topic. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of ASCR with mesh augmentation for the treatment of irreparable RCTs. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The data of 72 patients with irreparable RCTs who underwent ASCR between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Among them, 64 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. Fascia lata grafts augmented with a polypropylene mesh were used for 30 patients (mesh group), and grafts without mesh augmentation were used for 34 patients (control group). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using range of motion, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire, and visual analog scale for pain. Radiological outcomes were evaluated according to acromiohumeral distance and stage of rotator cuff arthropathy. The status of fatty infiltration and graft integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Results: Both groups showed improvement in clinical and radiological outcomes at the final follow-up. The mesh group demonstrated a larger improvement in ASES score (mean ± SD, 29.1 ± 15.8) than the control group (18.1 ± 15.9) (P =.006). The mean improvement in active forward flexion was significantly higher in mesh group (40°± 26°) than in control group (28°± 23°) (P =.003). The mean improvement in active external rotation was also significantly higher in the mesh group (11°± 5°) than in the control group (6°± 3°) (P =.004). Graft healing rate was significantly higher in the mesh group (83.3%) than in the control group (58.8%) (P =.039), and acromiohumeral distance was significantly greater in the mesh group (9.1 ± 2.4 mm) than in the control group (6.3 ± 1.8 mm) at the final follow-up (P =.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with graft failure generally showed progression of fatty infiltration without improvement in the stage of rotator cuff arthropathy. Patients with intact grafts demonstrated a more substantial improvement in functional outcomes (ASES score and forward flexion motion). Conclusion: ASCR with mesh augmentation reduced graft failure rate to restore superior shoulder joint stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) was recently introduced as a treatment for irreparable superior rotator cuff tears in younger patients. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to assess the biomechanical strength of 3 methods for fixation of the graft to the glenoid for SCR. It was hypothesized that a 4-anchor technique would provide greater load to failure than 3-anchor techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Thirty-six cadaveric specimens were randomized into 3 groups of previously established glenoid-side graft fixation techniques: (1) three 3.5-mm knotless screw-in anchors, (2) three 3.0-mm knotless push-in anchors, and (3) a 4-anchor hybrid construct with two 3.0-mm knotted push-in anchors and two 2.9-mm knotless push-in anchors. The repairs were cyclically loaded at 0.5 Hz from 10 to 200 N, then pulled to failure. Elongation, stiffness, maximum load at failure, and mode of failure were recorded and calculated. Results: There were no significant differences in graft elongation or stiffness among the 3 techniques (P > .37 and P > .26, respectively). Maximum load to failure was significantly greater in technique 1 (mean ± SD, 427.85 ± 119.70 N) than technique 3 (319.5 ± 57.60 N) (P = 0.024). There were no significant differences in load to failure between techniques 1 and 2 or between techniques 2 and 3. Conclusion: Glenoid-side graft fixation with 3 threaded 3.5-mm suture anchors showed a significant superior pull-out strength when compared with a 4-anchor hybrid technique and thus might be recommended in SCR for patients with irreparable superior rotator cuff tears to achieve maximum stability. Clinical Relevance: SCR presents a novel alternative for treatment of irreparable superior rotator cuff tears in younger patients. Glenoid fixation is essential to provide adequate fixation of the graft to prevent the humeral head from rising and to restore normal biomechanics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:Arthroscopic partial repair is a treatment option in irreparable large-to-massive rotator cuff tears without arthritic changes. However, there are indications that arthroscopic partial repair does not yield satisfactory outcomes.Purpose:To report the clinical and radiographic results of arthroscopic partial repairs in patients with irreparable large-to-massive cuff tears. In addition, an analysis was performed regarding preoperative factors that may influence patient outcomes and patient-rated satisfaction over time.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:From 2005 to 2011, a total of 31 patients who underwent arthroscopic partial repair for irreparable large-to-massive cuff tears were retrospectively evaluated. Partial repair was defined as posterior cuff tissue repair with or without subscapularis tendon repair to restore the transverse force couple of the cuff. Pain visual analog scale (PVAS), questionnaire results (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] and Simple Shoulder Test [SST]), and radiographic changes (acromiohumeral distance and degenerative change) were assessed preoperatively, at first follow-up (roughly 1 year postoperatively), and at final follow-up (>2 years postoperatively). Patients rated their satisfaction level at each postoperative follow-up as well. Preoperative factors that might influence outcomes, such as patient demographics, tear size, and fatty infiltration, were investigated.Results:The preoperative, first follow-up, and final follow-up results for mean PVAS (5.13, 2.13, and 3.16, respectively) and questionnaires (ASES: 41.97, 76.37, and 73.78; SST: 3.61, 6.33, and 6.07, respectively) improved significantly (all P < .05). Radiographic evaluation showed no difference compared with preoperative status. Nevertheless, patient-rated satisfaction at final evaluation was inferior: 16 good responses (“very satisfied” and “satisfied”) and 15 poor responses (“rather the same” and “dissatisfied”). Despite initial improvements in both groups (P < .05), patients with poor satisfaction demonstrated statistically significant deterioration in mean PVAS (from 2.07 to 4.67), questionnaire scores (ASES: from 74.56 to 59.80; SST: from 5.11 to 3.81), and acromiohumeral distance (from 7.19 to 5.06 mm) between the first and final follow-up (all P < .05). Patients with good satisfaction showed no significant difference or they improved (P > .05) from the first to the final follow-up. Among preoperative factors, fatty infiltration of the teres minor was identified as the only statistically significant factor affecting patient-rated satisfaction (P = .007).Conclusion:This study showed that arthroscopic partial repair may produce initial improvement in selected outcomes at 2-year follow-up. However, about half of the patients in the study were not satisfied with their outcomes, which had deteriorated over time. Preoperative fatty infiltration of the teres minor was the only factor that correlated with worse final outcomes and poor satisfaction after arthroscopic partial repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]