Search

Study Design: Retrospective propensity score matching (PSM) study. Objective: To investigate the perioperative outcomes comparing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS) patients following posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Methods: 425 female AIS and AdIS patients who were operated (between January 2015 to March 2020) using a dual attending surgeon strategy were stratified into G1 (AIS aged 10-16 years old) and G2 (AdIS > 20 years old). PSM analysis with one-to-one, nearest neighbor matching technique with match tolerance of 0.001 was used to matched 357 AIS patients to 68 AdIS patients. Operation duration, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), blood loss percentage, hemoglobin drift, blood salvaged, postoperative wound length, allogenic blood transfusion requirement, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative Cobb, correction rate and postoperative complications were documented and reported. Results: Following PSM, G1 and G2 each had 50 patients with comparable and balanced covariates. As anticipated, G2 patients were heavier, taller and had higher body mass index compared to G1 patients (P < 0.05). We could not find any significant differences in the perioperative outcome comparing this 2 groups. AIS and AdIS patients had similar operation duration (125.9 ± 27.2 min vs 127.3 ± 37.8 min), IBL (749.8 ± 315.7 ml vs 723.8 ± 342.1 ml) and length of hospital stay (3.3 ± 0.4 days vs 3.5 ± 0.8 days) (P > 0.05). Hemoglobin drift and amount of blood salvaged were comparable (P > 0.05). G2 had stiffer curves. There was a trend toward a lower correction rate in G2 in the immediate postoperative period, however it did not reach statistical significance (61.8 ± 11.2% vs. 66.3 ± 11.6%, P = 0.051). No patients required blood transfusion and none had any postoperative complications. Conclusion: Adolescent and adult female scoliosis patients had comparable perioperative outcome following PSF surgery that was carried out using a dual attending surgeon strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Informal caregivers are at risk of being overwhelmed by various sources of suffering while caring for their significant others. It is, therefore, important for caregivers to take care of themselves. In the self-care context, mindfulness has the potential to reduce caregiver suffering. We studied the effect of a single session of 20-minute mindful breathing on the perceived level of suffering, together with the changes in bispectral index score (BIS) among palliative care informal caregivers. This was a randomized controlled study conducted at the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia. Forty adult palliative care informal caregivers were recruited and randomly assigned to either 20-minute mindful breathing or 20-minute supportive listening. The changes in perceived suffering and BIS were measured preintervention and postintervention. The reduction in suffering score in the intervention group was significantly more than the control group at minute 20 (U = 124.0, n1 = n2 = 20, mean rank1 = 24.30, mean rank2 = 16.70, z = −2.095, P =.036). The reduction in BIS in the intervention group was also significantly greater than the control group at minute 20 (U = 19.5, n1 = n2 = 20, mean rank1 = 29.52, mean rank2 = 11.48, z = −4.900, P <.0001). Twenty minutes of mindful breathing was more efficacious than 20 minutes of supportive listening in the reduction in suffering among palliative care informal caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of 20-minute mindful breathing in suffering reduction. Forty palliative care patients with an overall suffering score of 4 or above as measured with the Suffering Pictogram were recruited and randomly assigned to 20-minute mindful breathing or 20-minute supportive listening. There was statistically significant reduction of suffering score in both the groups. For Bispectral Index Score value, there was statistically significant difference between intervention and control. A 20-minute mindful breathing could be useful in the alleviation of suffering in palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]