Search

Intensive care physicians may assume the primary care of patients with transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA), an uncommon but potentially critical complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) and solid organ transplants. TA-TMA can have a dramatic presentation with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) associated with high morbidity and mortality. The typical presenting clinical features are hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, refractory hypertension, proteinuria and worsening renal failure. Intestinal involvement, with abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites are also common. Cardiopulmonary involvement may develop from various causes including pulmonary arteriolar hypertension, pleural and pericardial effusions, and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. Due to other often concurrent complications after HSCT, early diagnosis and effective management of TA-TMA may be challenging. Close collaboration between ICU and transplant physicians, along with other relevant specialists, is needed to best manage these patients. There are currently no approved therapies for the treatment of TA-TMA. Plasma exchange and rituximab are not recommended unless circulating factor H (CFH) antibodies or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP; ADAMTS activity < 10%) are diagnosed or highly suspected. The role of the complement pathway activation in the pathophysiology of TA-TMA has led to the successful use of targeted complement inhibitors, such as eculizumab. However, the relatively larger studies using eculizumab have been mostly conducted in the pediatric population with limited data on the adult population. This review is focused on the role of intensive care physicians to emphasize the clinical approach to patients with suspected TA-TMA and to discuss diagnosis and treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Medication nonadherence continues to be challenging for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. The risk and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are associated with low immunosuppressant concentrations (which can be improved with model-informed precision dosing (MIPD)) and with immunosuppressant nonadherence (which can be improved with acceptable interventions). Methods: With the goals of improving adherence and achieving therapeutic concentrations of immunosuppressants to eliminate GVHD, we characterized the feasibility of using the Medication Event Monitoring (MEMS®) Cap in adult HCT recipients. Results: Of the 27 participants offered the MEMS® Cap at the time of hospital discharge, 7 (25.9%) used it, which is below our a priori threshold of 70%. These data suggest the MEMS® Cap is not feasible for HCT recipients. The MEMS® Cap data were available for a median of 35 days per participant per medication (range: 7–109 days). The average daily adherence per participant ranged from 0 to 100%; four participants had an average daily adherence of over 80%. Conclusions: MIPD may be supported by MEMS® technology to provide the precise time of immunosuppressant self-administration. The MEMS® Cap was used by only a small percentage (25.9%) of HCT recipients in this pilot study. In accordance with larger studies using less accurate tools to evaluate adherence, immunosuppressant adherence varied from 0% to 100%. Future studies should establish the feasibility and clinical benefit of combining MIPD with newer technology, specifically the MEMS® Button, which can inform the oncology pharmacist of the time of immunosuppressant self-administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]