Search

Objective: To examine predictors of informant-reported everyday functioning in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and relations between everyday function and conversion to dementia., Methods: Informants of participants (n = 2614) with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were administered the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Changes in dimensions of functional ability as determined by an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were examined over 3 years and participant predictors of change were examined using multilevel modeling (MLM)., Results: The FAQ consisted of 3 factors, multistep, finance, and memory/orientation daily tasks. Impairment in memory/orientation tasks was significantly higher than impairment in multistep tasks. Worse functioning was associated with greater depression, worse memory, worse speed/EF, higher years of education and identifying as White. There was variability in some of these associations with different FAQ factors. Impairments in financial and memory/orientation daily tasks predicted follow-up conversion to dementia., Conclusions: Depression, speed/EF, and memory are consistently associated with domains of everyday functioning. Race, education, and age may be more variability associated with everyday functioning. Specific attention should be paid to subtle declines in the financial and memory/orientation domains as they may uniquely predict future dementia development. Depression may be a modifiable risk factor associated with functional impairment over time.

The Digit Span test is a widely used working memory measure. However, when using standardized scoring procedures, previous studies have demonstrated inconsistent relationships between Digit Span subtests and working memory measures frequently used in cognitive psychology experiments. Partial scoring involves awarding credit for all digits recalled in the correct serial location, whereas traditional scoring involves only awarding credit for a trial if all digits are recalled in the correct serial location. The current study compared the traditional all-or-nothing scoring method and the partial scoring method on Digit Span with other working memory measures and with measures of general fluid intelligence. The results showed that when differences were found, partial scoring was associated with stronger relationships with Digit Span Backwards but weaker relationships with Digit Span Forward and Sequencing compared with traditional scoring. These results support previous findings identifying differences between the Digit Span subtests and the utility of examining traditional scoring procedures.