Search

Introduction: Oligometastatic disease has emerged as an intermediate state between localized and systemic cancer. Improvements in diagnostic modalities such as functional imaging allow a greater frequency of oligometastases diagnosis. Patients with selected oligometastatic epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) may be treated with metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) rather than chemotherapy., Case Description: We describe a 58-year-old woman who underwent surgery and chemotherapy for an EOC. The patient underwent 3 chemotherapy lines for recurrence of disease, but had allergic reactions and serious hematologic toxicity. During follow-up, lymph node oligometastases were diagnosed and treated with repeated SBRT because the patient refused further chemotherapy. No side effects were observed after each course of SBRT and the patient obtained complete response of all irradiated sites., Conclusions: SBRT is a promising treatment approach for recurrent oligometastatic EOC with a high control rate and irrelevant iatrogenic toxicity. The possibility to repeat SBRT courses when new oligometastases are encountered in other sites resulted in an adequate long-term palliation approach.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy (16 Gy in 2 fractions, 1 week apart) in patients with complicated bone metastases and poor performance status., Methods: A prospective single-arm phase II clinical trial was conducted from July 2014 to May 2016. The primary endpoint was pain response as defined in the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints. Secondary endpoints included quality of life as measured by quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) PAL-15 and QLQ-BM22 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer guidelines, pain flare, adverse events, re-irradiation, and skeletal complications., Results: Fifty patients were enrolled. There were 23 men with a median age of 58 years (range 26-86). Of the 50 patients, 38 had an extraosseous soft tissue component, 18 needed postsurgical radiation, 3 had neuropathic pain, and 3 had an impending fracture in a weight-bearing bone. At 2 months, 33 patients were alive (66%). Four (12.5%) had a complete response and 12 (37.5%) had a partial response. A statistically significant improvement was seen in the functional interference (p = 0.01) and psychosocial aspects (p = 0.03) of the BM22. No patient had spinal cord compression. One patient required surgery for pathologic fracture, and another re-irradiation., Conclusions: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (16 Gy in 2 fractions of 8 Gy 1 week apart) achieved satisfactory pain relief and safety results in patients with complicated bone metastases and poor performance status.

Aims: To assess the contribution of radiation oncologists in Italy in current management of breakthrough pain (BtP)., Methods: In 2012, the Palliative and Supportive Care Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) proposed a survey. All Italian radiation oncologists were individually invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their management of BtP in patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment., Results: A total of 303 Italian radiation oncologists (of 330 who had access to the Web site) completed the questionnaire over an 8-month period. Some important differences were shown in pain intensity assessment by validated measurement scales, as well as in setting and prescribing analgesic therapy to prevent procedural pain. These differences were also reviewed and discussed related to international guidelines and data available from the literature., Conclusions: Compared to other medical professionals, the involvement of radiation oncologists in cancer pain management remains marginal, at least in Italy. More than 70% of radiation oncologists directly optimized the analgesic therapy during the treatment course and more than 50% implemented specific treatment for BtP. However, the ability of the radiation oncologist to manage BtP could be improved. In order to increase the consciousness of systematic symptom measurement and to spread the knowledge of the best type of analgesic drugs to be used, training events promoted by national associations, such as AIRO, and a collaborative multidisciplinary approach of the management of cancer pain will be promoted.

Aims and Background: Few clinical data exist concerning normal brain tissue tolerance to re-irradiation. The present study evaluated long-term outcome of 22 recurrent glioblastoma patients re-irradiated with radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy., Methods: Twenty-two patients were treated with radiosurgery (13, 59%) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (9, 41%) for 24 lesions of recurrent glioblastoma. The male/female ratio was 14:8, median age 55 years (range, 27-81), and median Karnofsky performance status 90 (range, 70-100). The majority of the cases (77%) was in recursive partitioning analysis classes III or IV Radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was chosen according to lesion size and location., Results: Median time between primary radiotherapy and re-irradiation was 9 months. Median doses were 17 Gy and 30 Gy, whereas median cumulative normalized total dose was 141 Gy and 98 Gy for radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, respectively. All patients submitted to radiosurgery had a cumulative normalized total dose of more than 100 Gy, whereas only a few (44%) of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy patients had a cumulative normalized total dose exceeding 100 Gy. Median follow-up from re-irradiation was 54 months. At the time of analysis, all patients had died. After re-irradiation, 1 (4%) lesion was in partial remission, 16 (67%) lesions were stable, and the remaining 7 (29%) were in progression. Median duration of response was 6 months, and median survival from re-irradiation 11 months. Three of 13 (23%) patients submitted to radiosurgery developed asymptomatic brain radionecrosis. The cumulative normalized total dose for the 3 patients was 122 Gy, 124 Gy, and 141 Gy, respectively. In one case, the volume of the lesion was large (14 cc), and in the other 2 the interval between the first and second cycle of radiotherapy was short (5 months)., Conclusions: Re-irradiation with radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is feasible and effective in recurrent glioblastoma patients. Apart from the importance of an accurate patient selection, cumulative radiotherapy dose and a correct indication for radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy must be taken into account to avoid brain toxicity.

Aims and Background: Adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy plus radiotherapy represents the standard treatment for radically resected rectal cancer at high risk of relapse according to the NIH Consensus Conference. The therapeutic gain was obtained with a high rate of severe treatment-related toxicity and a suboptimal patient compliance with this regimen. Raltitrexed is a specific thymidylate synthase inhibitor with a convenient administration schedule, acceptable toxicity and radiosensitizing properties, as the published phase I trials in combination with radiotherapy have shown. The aim of this prospective multicenter phase II study was to evaluate the feasibility, gastrointestinal and hematological acute toxicity of raltitrexed in combination with radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients., Methods: From September 2000 to June 2004, 50 patients with radically resected stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma were treated. All patients were evaluable for compliance and acute toxicity. Within 45-60 days of surgery, each patient underwent concomitant adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Radiotherapy was administered to the pelvis (plus perineum after abdominoperineal resection) with photon beam energy exceeding 5 MV, 3-4 fields, 45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks plus a boost delivered to the site of resected disease with 3-4 fields, 9 Gy/5 fractions/1 week to a total dose of 54 Gy. The boost dose was administered after complete exclusion of the small bowel from the treatment volumes; if this was not possible a total dose of 50.4 Gy was given. Raltitrexed was administered intravenously at a dose of 3 mg/m2 as a bolus injection on days 1 and 22 of radiotherapy one hour before treatment, for a total of two cycles. Each patient underwent weekly clinical evaluation and laboratory tests. Toxicity was assessed by the WHO scale., Results: Forty-five (90%) patients completed the established treatment. Acute severe toxicity included grade III proctitis in 4/50 (8%), grade III-IV diarrhea in 4/50 (8%), grade III perineal dermatitis in 4/50 (8%) and grade III leukopenia in 2/50 (4%) patients; five patients (10%) experienced a transient grade Ill increase in their liver biochemistry values., Conclusions: Our data related to acute toxicity and patient compliance proved the feasibility of this adjuvant radiochemotherapy treatment. A longer follow-up is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of this new regimen in terms of disease-free and overall survival.

The recent improvements of therapeutic approaches in oncology have allowed a certain number of patients with advanced disease to survive much longer than in the past. So, the number of cases with brain metastases and metastatic spinal cord compression has increased, as has the possibility of developing a recurrence in areas of the central nervous system already treated with radiotherapy. Clinicians are reluctant to perform re-irradiation of the brain, because of the risk of severe side effects. The tolerance dose for the brain to a single course of radiotherapy is 50-60 Gy in 2 Gy daily fractions. New metastases appear in 22-73% of the cases after whole brain radiotherapy, but the percentage of reirradiated patients is 3-10%. An accurate selection must be made before giving an indication to re-irradiation. Patients with Karnofsky performance status > 70, age < 65 years, controlled primary and no extracranial metastases are those with the best prognosis. The absence of extracranial disease was the most significant factor in conditioning survival, and maximum tumor diameter was the only variable associated with an increased risk of unacceptable acute and/or chronic neurotoxicity. Re-treatment of brain metastases can be done with whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Most patients had no relevant radiation-induced toxicity after a second course of whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. There are few data on fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the re-irradiation of brain metastases. In general, the incidence of an "in-field" recurrence of spinal metastasis varies from 2.5-11% of cases and can occur 2-40 months after the first radiotherapy cycle. Radiation-induced myelopathy can occur months or years (6 months-7 years) after radiotherapy, and the pathogenesis remains obscure. Higher radiotherapy doses, larger doses per fraction, and previous exposure to radiation could be associated with a higher probability of developing radiation-induced myelopathy. Experimental data indicate that also the total dose of the first and second radiotherapy, interval to re-treatment, length of the irradiated spinal cord, and age of the treated animals influence the risk of radiation-induced myelopathy. An alpha/beta ratio of 1.9-3 Gy could be generally the reference value for fractionated radiotherapy. However, when fraction sizes are up to 5 Gy, the linear-quadratic equation become a less valid model. The early diagnosis of relapse is crucial in conditioning response to re-treatment.

Metastatic spinal cord compression, diagnosed in 3-7% of cancer patients, is one of the most dreaded complications of metastatic cancer. It is an oncologic emergency, which must be diagnosed early and treated promptly to achieve the best results and avoid progressive pain, paralysis, sensory loss and sphincter incontinence. Patients who are ambulatory at the time of the diagnosis have a higher probability of obtaining good response to treatment and a longer survival. In clinical practice, back pain accompanies metastatic spinal cord compression in most cases, even in patients with no neurologic deficits. Magnetic resonance imaging is the best tool for diagnosing metastatic spinal cord compression and is able to identify spinal cord compression in 32-35% patients with back pain, bone metastases and normal neurologic examination. Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging gives the extension of the lesion, can diagnose other unsuspected clinical metastatic spinal cord compression sites, and is useful for the radiation oncologist in defining the target volume. Radiotherapy is the treatment of choice in most cases, whereas surgery is advised only in selected patients (ie, if stabilization is necessary, if radiotherapy has already been given in the same area, when vertebral body collapse causes bone impingement on the cord or nerve roots, when there are diagnostic doubts, or when computed tomography-guided percutaneous vertebral biopsy cannot be performed). Laminectomy should be abandoned in favor of more aggressive surgery (ie, posterior, anterior, and/or lateral approach, tumor mass resection, and stabilization of the spine). Generally, radiotherapy must be administered 7-10 days after surgery. The optimal radiation schedule has not been defined. However, as recently suggested by some clinical trials, even the hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens are effective and can be used without increasing radiation-induced myelopathy. Moderate doses of dexamethasone should be used in the early phases of therapy. After radiotherapy, spinal recurrence is generally found in sites different from the first compression area. A close post-treatment follow-up is suggested using clinical parameters (pain, motor and sphincter function), and magnetic resonance imaging should be performed only when a second metastatic spinal cord compression and/or myelopathy are clinically suspected.