Search

Background: Injury or loss of the meniscus generally leads to degenerative osteoarthritic changes in the knee joint. However, the treatment options for symptomatic patients with total meniscectomy are limited. Therefore, we developed a novel, anatomically shaped, total meniscal implant made of polycarbonate urethane., Purpose: To evaluate the in vivo performance of this novel total meniscal implant. The assessment particularly focused on the implant's response to long-term physiological loading in a goat model and its chondroprotective capacity in comparison to clinically relevant controls., Study Design: Controlled laboratory study., Methods: Surgery was performed to the stifle joint of 26 female Saanen goats, subdivided into 4 groups: implant, allograft, total meniscectomy, and sham surgery. The sham group's contralateral joints served as nonoperated controls. After 12 months of follow-up, investigators evaluated implant wear, deformation, and the histopathological condition of the synovium and cartilage., Results: Wear of the implant's articulating surfaces was minimal, which was confirmed by the absence of wear particles in the synovial fluid. Implant deformation was limited. However, one implant failed by complete tearing of the posterior horn extension. No differences in cartilage histopathological condition were observed for the implant, allograft, and meniscectomy groups. However, locally, the cartilage scores for these groups were significantly worse than those of the nonoperated controls., Conclusion: Whereas this study demonstrated that the novel implant is resistant to wear and that deformation after 12 months of physiological loading is acceptable, reinforcement of the implant horns is necessary to prevent horn failure. Although the implant could not protect the cartilage from developing degenerative changes, the progression of damage was similar in the allograft group., Clinical Relevance: This novel polycarbonate urethane implant may have the potential to become an alternative treatment for symptomatic patients with total meniscectomy.

Background: Replacement of the meniscus by an implant could potentially avoid cartilage degeneration., Hypothesis: An implant of degradable polycaprolacton-polyurethane should act as a temporary scaffold enabling regeneration of a new meniscus by slow degradation of the polymer and simultaneous in-growth and differentiation of tissues into the typical cartilage-like tissue of the meniscus., Study Design: Controlled laboratory study., Methods: In 13 dogs' knees, the lateral meniscus was replaced with a porous polymer implant (6 and 7 for 6- and 24-month follow-up, respectively); in 7 knees only a meniscectomy was performed. In 6 knees, no surgery was performed. After 6 and 24 months, the implants and the articular cartilage were histologically evaluated. Compression-stress tests were performed on implant biopsy specimens., Results: The implants were fully integrated into the tissue without formation of a capsule. The foreign body reaction did not exceed grade I. Differentiation from fibrous- to cartilage-like tissue was pronounced after 24 months. Viable cells were particularly absent after 24 months in central parts of the most anterior part of the scaffold. The mechanical properties of the implants were intermediate between the scaffold before implantation and native meniscus tissue and were not different between 6 and 24 months. After both 6 and 24 months, small areas of the implant were not covered with tissue. Cartilage degeneration was not prevented., Conclusion: A final remodeling of tissue into neomeniscus tissue could not take place since the original structure of the polymer was still present after 24 months. The implant did not prevent cartilage degradation. Several factors are discussed that may be responsible for this., Clinical Relevance: Although clinical application of a polymer implant for the replacement of the entire meniscus is not supported by this study, the authors strongly believe in the concept, but further improvements in the implant and surgical technique are needed before such an implant can be recommended for human clinical use.

Background: Meniscectomy will lead to articular cartilage degeneration in the long term. Therefore, the authors developed an implant to replace the native meniscus., Hypothesis: The porous polymer meniscus implant develops into a neomeniscus and protects the cartilage from degeneration., Study Design: Controlled laboratory study., Methods: In a dog model, a porous polymer scaffold with optimal properties for tissue infiltration and regeneration of a neomeniscus was implanted and compared with total meniscectomy. The tissue infiltration and redifferentiation in the scaffold, the stiffness of the scaffold, and the articular cartilage degeneration were evaluated., Results: Three months after implantation, the implant was completely filled with fibrovascular tissue. After 6 months, the central areas of the implant contained cartilage-like tissue with abundant collagen type II and proteoglycans in their matrix. The foreign-body reaction remained limited to a few giant cells in the implant. The compression modulus of the implant-tissue construct still differed significantly from that of the native meniscus, even at 6 months. Cartilage degeneration was observed both in the meniscectomy group and in the implant group., Conclusion: The improved properties of these polymer implants resulted in a faster tissue infiltration and in phenotypical differentiation into tissue resembling that of the native meniscus. However, the material characteristics of the implant need to be improved to prevent degeneration of the articular cartilage., Clinical Relevance: The porous polymer implant developed into a polymer-tissue construct that resembled the native meniscus, and with improved gliding characteristics, this prosthesis might be a promising implant for the replacement of the meniscus.

Unlabelled: Meniscus replacement by a polymer meniscus prosthesis in dogs resulted in generation of new meniscal tissue., Hypothesis: Optimal functioning of the prosthesis would involve realistic deformation and motion patterns of the prosthesis during knee joint motion., Study Design: Controlled laboratory study., Methods: The movements of the meniscus were determined during knee joint flexion and extension with and without internal and external tibial torque by means of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Subsequently, the meniscus in 6 human cadaveric knee joints was replaced by a meniscus prosthesis., Results: All different parts of the meniscus showed a posterior displacement during knee joint flexion. The anterior horn was more mobile than the posterior horn. The prosthesis mimicked the movements of the meniscus. However, the excursions of the prosthesis on the tibial plateau were less. The knee joint laxity was not significantly higher after replacement with the meniscus prosthesis., Conclusions: The prosthesis approximated the behavior of the native meniscus. Improvement in both the gliding characteristics of the prosthetic material and the fixation of the prosthesis may improve the function., Clinical Relevance: The meniscus prosthesis needs to be optimized to achieve a better initial function in the knee joint., (Copyright 2004 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine)

Background: Many procedures, both nonoperative and operative, have been described for treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocations. The best primary treatment, however, still remains unclear., Purpose: We present a new surgical technique in which the clavicle is reduced to an anatomic position, the coracoacromial ligament is transferred to the clavicle, and acromioclavicular joint fixation is accomplished with the use of absorbable, braided suture cord., Methods: Twenty-one patients underwent the modified technique of reconstruction. Patients were included only if they had sustained a Rockwood type V acromioclavicular dislocation and were extremely active in competitive sports before dislocation occurred., Results: Eighteen patients returned to their sports without pain within 2.5 months after operation. The mean follow-up was 35.7 months. The average Constant score at last follow-up was 97. Radiographs taken at this time confirmed anatomic reduction in 18 patients, residual subluxation in 2 patients, and, in 1 patient, redislocation of the joint that occurred because of infection. Six patients had radiographic evidence of coracoclavicular ossifications. All patients developed a wide scar., Conclusions: Considering its operative simplicity, the advantage of absorbable augmentation of the clavicular reduction, and the low rate of recurrence, this technique may be an attractive alternative in this particular group of patients.