Search

Objective The primary objective was to investigate the long-term survival of patients who underwent single-vessel coronary revascularization with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery with or without hybrid revascularization. The secondary outcome measures were repeat revascularization either by coronary artery bypass grafting or by percutaneous coronary intervention and the incidence of myocardial infarction or recurrent angina. Methods This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass procedure in our center between January 2001 and December 2015. Procedures were performed either through small left anterolateral thoracotomy or lower midline sternotomy. Results A total of 182 patients were identified: 100 underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass to the left anterior descending artery and 82 underwent hybrid revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention to coronary arteries other than the left anterior descending artery along with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass to the left anterior descending artery). The mean ± SD age was 62 ± 10.1 years. Preoperatively 82% were male, and 72.5% patients had good left ventricular function. The median follow-up period was 10.9 years. There was no inhospital or 30-day mortality. The 10-year actuarial survival was 84.8%. Freedom from repeat revascularization was 98.9% at 1 year and 89.9% at 10 years. At follow-up, freedom from myocardial infarction was 96.7% whereas freedom from angina was 92.9%. Conclusions Within the limitations imposed by retrospective analyses, our study demonstrates excellent long-term outcome in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with or without hybrid revascularization. For isolated left anterior descending artery disease minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass should be considered, whereas hybrid revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass) should be considered for multivessel disease.

Background We sought to determine the incidence of hospital death due to surgical compromise of the coronary ostia in aortic valve replacement. The mechanism of coronary ostium blockage was also investigated. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of prospectively collected clinical data and autopsy findings in 322 patients who died in hospital after aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures in a single institution from January 1998 to March 2013. Results Over the 15-year period, more than 17 surgeons performed 7507 aortic valve replacements with or without other procedures. The mean age of the patients was 70.8 ± 11.78 years and 63% were male. Bioprosthetic valves were used in 75%, mechanical valves in 24.7%, and homografts in only 0.3%. Early mortality for all patients (combined, emergency, and redo procedures) was 4.29% (mean logistic EuroSCORE 10.7). There were 322 deaths after procedures involving the aortic valve. Autopsy examinations were carried out in all patients and showed that 3.4% ( n = 11) of deaths were at least partly attributed to encroachment on one or both coronary ostia. Causes of ostial compromise included the valve sutures, the valve sewing ring, and the aortotomy suture line. Conclusions Coronary ostial compromise in aortic valve replacement is a very rare but real problem occurring in at least 0.15% of aortic valve replacements and contributing to or directly causing one in every 29 aortic valve replacement deaths. Surgeons should have a high level of awareness of the risk of this rare but fatal and avoidable complication.

Between April 2001 and December 2005, data were collected prospectively from 2,320 consecutive patients who underwent first-time coronary artery bypass. Logistic multiple regression analyses were carried out to determine the independent predictors of gastrointestinal complications and death. There were 65 major gastrointestinal complications identified in 65 (2.8%) patients: paralytic ileus in 15, mesenteric ischemia in 12, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 16, lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 8, small bowel obstruction in 5, pseudoobstruction in 5, and others in 4. The 30-day mortality was 21.5% (14 patients). Female sex, preoperative creatinine >200 µmol·L−1, previous gastrointestinal pathology, low cardiac output, readmission to the intensive care unit, postoperative pulmonary complications, arrhythmias, hemofiltration, and reoperation were independent predictors of major gastrointestinal complications. Independent risk factors for death were readmission to the intensive care unit, the need for hemofiltration, reoperation, and ischemic bowel. Careful hemodynamic control and optimization of perioperative organ perfusion are important to minimize the mortality associated with major gastrointestinal complications after coronary artery bypass.