Search

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a balloon-mounted drug-eluting stent (DES) for recurrent carotid in-stent stenosis (ISS)., Methods: As part of our targeted carotid artery stenting (TARGET-CAS) protocol, neurological and ultrasound evaluations have been performed at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually since 2001 in all carotid stent patients. For angiographically-confirmed >70% ISS, balloon angioplasty was performed as a first-line treatment. Recurrent ISS was treated with a 4.0-mm zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent (ZES) that was postdilated according to intravascular ultrasound imaging. Among the 1350 neuroprotected CAS procedures performed between January 2001 and March 2011, there were 7 (0.52%) patients (5 men; ages 51-72 years), all neurologically asymptomatic, with >70% recurrent ISS that occurred at 5 to 11 months after the initial balloon angioplasty treatment for ISS., Results: ZES implantation under distal embolic protection was technically successful and uncomplicated. Angiographic stenosis was reduced from 84.6%±7.5% to 10.7%±3.6% (p<0.01). In 5 patients with ZES implanted fully within the self-expanding carotid stent, duplex ultrasound follow-up (mean 17 months, range 6-36) revealed no evidence of restenosis or stent fracture/deformation. In the 2 other patients, the ZES had been implanted for distal edge ISS such that the ZES protruded beyond the original carotid stent. This protruding segment of the ZES demonstrated deformation/kinking in both; in one, this led to symptomatic stent occlusion., Conclusion: The use of coronary ZES in the treatment of recurrent carotid ISS is feasible and appears effective provided the ZES is placed entirely within the original stent. Placement of a coronary ZES outside the carotid stent scaffold should be avoided.

Purpose: To evaluate the possible role of transcranial color-coded Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) in predicting cerebral reperfusion injury (CRI) in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis., Methods: TCD was obtained in 210 patients (149 men; mean age 64.2+/-8.4 years, range 44-83) who underwent CAS for ICA stenosis averaging 86.7%+/-8.4%. Contralateral ICA occlusion or near occlusion (stenosis >90%) was present in 67 (31.9%) patients. TCD was performed before and 24 hours after CAS with assessment of peak systolic velocities (PSVs) in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (iMCA) and contralateral middle cerebral artery (cMCA). PSV ratios (PSVR) in the iMCA and cMCA were calculated from the PSVs before and after CAS., Results: CRI syndrome occurred in 3 (1.4%) patients (2 intracranial bleedings, 1 subarachnoid hemorrhage). The mean iMCA and cMCA PSVRs were 2.66+/-0.19 and 4.16+/-2.77, respectively, in CRI patients, while the PSVRs in CAS patients without neurological sequelae were 1.56+/-0.46 and 1.21+/-0.39, respectively (both p<0.001). The combination of iPSVR>2.4 and cPSVR>2.4 occurred in 4 patients with bilateral ICA disease; 3 (75%) of them developed CRI (100% sensitivity and 99% specificity for CRI prediction). The following independent CRI predictors were identified: combined iPSVR>2.4 and cPSVR>2.4 (RR 2.06, CI 1.89 to 2.24; p<0.001), high cMCA PSV after CAS (RR 1.23, CI 1.13 to 1.34; p<0.001), and contralateral ICA occlusion (RR 1.13, CI 1.03 to 1.23; p = 0.007)., Conclusion: TCD is an important tool in CRI risk evaluation. The combination of iPSVR>2.4 and cPSVR>2.4 is an independent CRI risk factor, along with contralateral ICA occlusion and high cMCA PSVs after CAS.

Purpose: To report the utility of proximal brain protection by flow reversal in endovascular management of critical internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis coexisting with ipsilateral external carotid artery (iECA) occlusion., Case Report: Four patients with a symptomatic, critical ICA stenosis (in-stent restenosis in one) and iECA occlusion were admitted for carotid artery stenting (CAS). In all cases, the stenosis severity and high-risk lesion morphology precluded the use of filter protection. The "tailored" CAS algorithm indicated that a proximal anti-embolism system should be used to maximize the potential for effective neuroprotection. The flow reversal system, which consists of an independent guiding sheath balloon positioned in the common carotid artery (CCA) and an iECA balloon-wire, was employed, using the CCA balloon only. The system was well-tolerated, and the CAS procedures were uneventful., Conclusion: Due to a unique design with separate CCA and iECA balloons, the flow reversal system can be used for proximal neuroprotection during CAS in severe, symptomatic ICA lesions coexisting with iECA occlusion.

Purpose: To develop and prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of an algorithm for tailoring neuroprotection devices (NPD) and stent types to the patient/lesion in carotid artery stenting (CAS)., Methods: From November 2002 to October 2007, 499 patients (360 men; mean age 65.2+/-8.4 years, range 36-88) were prospectively enrolled in a safety and efficacy study of tailored CAS using proximal (flow blockade or reversal) or distal (filters or occlusion) NPDs and closed- or open-cell self-expanding stents. Of the 535 lesions treated in the study, 175 (32.7%) were "high risk" by morphology. Half (50.1%) the patients were symptomatic., Results: A quarter (137, 25.6%) of the procedures were performed under proximal protection and the remainder (398, 74.4%) with distal NPDs; the direct stenting rate was 66.9%. High-risk lesions were treated predominantly with a proximal NPD and closed-cell stent (77.1% and 82.9%, respectively) and less frequently by direct stenting (37.1%, p<0.0001 versus non-high-risk lesions). The in-hospital death/stroke rate was 2.0% (95% CI 0.85% to 3.23%), and the death/major stroke rate was 0.7% (95% CI 0.02% to 1.48%). There were no myocardial infarctions, but there was 1 (0.2%) further death within 30 days. With the tailored approach, symptom status and high-risk lesion morphology were not risk factors for an adverse outcome after CAS; only age >75 years (p<0.001) was a predictor of short-term death. Long-term survival (95.4% at 1 and 88.3% at 5 years) was similar for symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients, direct stenting versus predilation, and closed- vs. open-cell stent design; only coronary artery disease adversely impacted survival (p = 0.04). The rates of freedom from death/ipsilateral stroke were 94.9% at 1 year and 85.9% at 5 years., Conclusion: Tailored CAS is associated with a low complication rate and high long-term efficacy. CAS operators should have a practical knowledge of different NPDs, including at least one proximal type.

Purpose: To assess flow velocities in the cerebral arteries after carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with unilateral versus bilateral lesions and analyze velocities in patients with neurological complications after CAS., Methods: Ninety-two patients (68 men; mean age 63.2 +/- 8.4 years, range 44-82) with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenoses were divided according to unilateral (group I, n = 72) or bilateral (group II, n = 20) disease. Fifty age- and gender-matched patients without lesions in the extra- or intracranial arteries served as a control group. Transcranial color-coded Doppler ultrasound was performed prior to and within 24 hours after CAS in the test groups; systolic velocities were assessed ipsilateral (i) and contralateral (c) to the CAS site in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA)., Results: Collateral flow via the anterior communicating artery (ACoA) was found in all group-II patients and 90% of group-I patients. After CAS, collateral flow through the ACoA ceased, and the velocity increased by 26% in the iMCA in group I compared to controls (p < 0.001). In group II, iMCA flow increased by 30% (p < 0.001) and flow via the ACoA (p < 0.001) increased, resulting in normalization of cMCA velocities (p = 0.928). In 89 (96.7%) subjects, CAS was uncomplicated. Hyperperfusion syndrome occurred in 2 (2.2%) patients, both with bilateral ICA stenoses; 1 (1.1%) transient ischemic attack was seen in a patient with unilateral disease. In the patients with hyperperfusion syndrome, the MCA velocities were 2.7- and 7.4-fold higher, respectively, versus before CAS and 2-fold higher than in controls., Conclusion: Uncomplicated CAS results in an iMCA velocity increase >25% compared to controls. MCA velocities in hyperperfusion syndrome were greatly increased versus before CAS and in controls.

Purpose: To report the use of the Parodi Anti-Emboli System (PAES) for cerebral protection during emergent vertebral artery recanalization., Case Report: A 56-year-old chimney sweep was referred with recurrent episodes of vertigo and gait ataxia. Left vertebral artery (LVA) flow was barely detectable on duplex Doppler, and brain computed tomography revealed a small infarct in the posterior inferior cerebellar artery territory. Angiography showed subtotal ostial stenosis of the LVA with poor distal flow and possible thrombus. Due to a high risk of distal embolization with percutaneous treatment, anticoagulation was initiated, and the lesion was to be re-evaluated in 2 to 3 weeks. However, 2 days later, the patient developed severe, aggravating headache, gait and left-limb ataxia, horizontal nystagmus, and vomiting. Emergent angiography showed a total ostial LVA occlusion. The PAES was employed to elicit a temporary subclavian steal during percutaneous LVA recanalization, thus protecting the brain from embolization. The ostial LVA was successfully recanalized and stented, with immediate symptom cessation., Conclusions: The PAES can be successfully applied in the subclavian artery to prevent distal embolization during emergent vertebral artery recanalization. Since a significant proportion of vertebral strokes are embolic, PAES may play a novel role in the treatment of acute cerebellar stroke.