Search

Background: There is a paucity of information in the literature on midterm outcomes from the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) with concomitant labral treatment in patients with mild osteoarthritis (OA) using modern surgical techniques. Purpose: To compare outcomes of hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAIS between patients with mild OA (Tönnis grade 1) and patients without OA (Tönnis grade 0) at minimum 5-year follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients were identified who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS with routine capsular closure between January 2012 and December 2015. Patients with Tönnis grade 1 were matched 1:3 by age, sex, and body mass index to patients without OA. The Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), HOS–Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score, and 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool were collected preoperatively and at 5 years postoperatively and compared between groups using an independent t test. Survivorship rate and percentage achievement of a Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) or minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were compared using a Fisher exact test. Results: A total of 50 patients (54 hips) with Tönnis grade 1 were matched to 162 patients (162 hips) with Tönnis grade 0. The mean ± SD age and body mass index of the Tönnis grade 1 group were 44.5 ± 9.6 years and 28.5 ± 5.5, respectively. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores improved significantly for both groups from presurgery to 5 years postoperatively for all PROs ( P≤ .03). There were no significant differences in preoperative PROs between the groups. Patients with Tönnis grade 1 had significantly lower postoperative scores on the HOS-ADL (74.7 ± 22.6 vs 83.0 ± 20.1; P = .04) and HOS-SS (58.8 ± 33.7 vs 71.8 ± 29.3; P = .03) than patients with grade 0. Patients with Tönnis grade 1 also had significantly lower rates of achievement of the MCID (57.1% vs 80.2%; P < .01) and PASS (34.1% vs 53.4%; P = .03) for any PRO when compared with patients with Tönnis grade 0. Gross survivorship was significantly lower for Tönnis grade 1 versus grade 0 (77.8% vs 96.9%; P < .001). Conclusion: Patients with Tönnis grade 1 arthritis experienced significant improvement in PROs after hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAIS. However, they had significantly lower postoperative HOS-ADL and HOS-SS scores with significantly lower rates of achievement on the MCID and PASS, with a significantly lower gross survivorship rate at a minimum 5 years postoperatively in comparison with those with Tönnis grade 0 changes.

Background: Patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) may frequently have co-existing sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. It is known that patients with lower back pain undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) have inferior outcomes; however, it is unclear what the effect of SIJ pain is on outcomes after hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To determine whether patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with SIJ pain either subjectively or on physical examination achieve similar postoperative improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) compared with patients without SIJ pain at 2-year follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS with SIJ pain were matched in a 1:2 ratio to controls without SIJ pain. Baseline demographics, as well as postoperative PROs and rates of achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) at 2-year follow-up were compared between the 2 groups. Results: A total of 73 patients (75 hips) with SIJ pain were matched to 150 control patients (150 hips) without SIJ pain. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement in all PROs at 2 years ( P < .05 for all). Patients with SIJ pain had significantly lower postoperative PRO scores for the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) (SIJ pain: 80.4 ± 22.4 vs no SIJ pain: 88.0 ± 15.1; P = .006), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) (SIJ pain: 73.2 ± 22.8 vs no SIJ pain: 80.0 ± 17.3; P < .001), and International Hip Outcome Tool–12 questionnaire (iHOT-12) (SIJ pain: 61.7 ± 25.9 vs no SIJ pain: 73.7 ± 23.7; P = .008). There were no statistically significant differences in improvement (delta) in PRO scores between the 2 groups ( P > .05 for all). The SIJ pain group had significantly lower achievement of MCID for the HOS-ADL (SIJ pain: 65.2% vs no SIJ pain: 80.5%; P = .044) but not HOS-SS, mHHS, or iHOT-12 ( P > .05 for all). The SIJ pain group had significantly lower achievement of PASS for the mHHS (SIJ pain: 27.5% vs no SIJ pain: 45.3%; P = .030) and iHOT-12 (SIJ pain: 31.0% vs no SIJ pain: 56.0%; P = .010) but not the HOS-ADL and HOS-SS ( P > .05 for both). Only 4.1% of patients with SIJ pain and 2.4% of controls required revision surgery or converted to THA at the time of final follow-up ( P = .69). Conclusion: Patients with FAIS and SIJ pain on history or physical examination experience significant improvement in PROs at 2 years after hip arthroscopy. However, they may be less likely to achieve the MCID or PASS and have significantly lower postoperative PROs compared with a matched cohort of patients without SIJ pain. Overall rates of revision and conversion to THA were similarly low in both groups.

Background: Hamstring injuries at the musculotendinous junction are relatively common. However, injuries to the proximal hamstring account for just 12% of hamstring injuries. Surgical repair of these injuries including both open and endoscopic techniques are becoming increasingly more common. Indications: Surgical intervention is generally reserved for cases with 2 or more torn tendons and at least 2 centimeters of retraction. Technique Description: The combined open and endoscopic technique utilizes direct posterior and posterolateral portals. After visualizing the posterior femoral cutaneous (PFCN) and sciatic nerves (SN), the proximal hamstring tear is identified, and the shaver is used to remove any surrounding adhesions and aid in clearing any hematoma. The ischial tuberosity is prepared using a shaver, radiofrequency ablation, and a 5.5 mm, round arthroscopic burr. Two, 4.5 mm, doubled-loaded anchors are placed into the ischium. The incision for the open portion of the case is created by incising the skin between the direct posterior and posterolateral portals. A dissection is continued down to the gluteal fascia, and the gluteal fascia is incised in line with the surgical incision. The gluteus maximus is retracted then the hamstring stump is secured with a stay suture and brought outside the surgical incision for inspection. The double-loaded sutures are passed in a running locking technique. The other suture limbs are then passed through the central aspect of the tendon and tensioned to reduce the proximal hamstring onto the prepared tuberosity. Results: Significant postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcomes have been reported for open and endoscopic repairs in isolation, but to date there are no outcomes studies on the combined “Scopen” technique. Postoperative complications may include numbness or neuropraxia, re-rupture, infection, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Discussion: The endoscopic portion allows an improved view and preservation of the SN and PFCN, as well as a detailed view of the ischial tuberosity for decortication and anchor placement in comparison with a purely open approach. In comparison with a purely endoscopic approach, this combined approach can be used in patients with retraction >4 cm, and can also be utilized for chronic, retracted tears as well.

Background: At the time of hip arthroscopy, some patients are found to have irreparable labral tears that are not amenable to primary repair. For these patients, treatment with segmental reconstruction is a surgical option to restore labral tissue and biomechanics. Indications: Patients with segmental irreparable hip labral tears that are technically not amenable for primary labral repair should be considered for labral reconstruction with allograft. Technique Description: Standard hip arthroscopic portals are established. An interportal capsulotomy is performed, and acetabular rim trimming is performed to remove the pincer deformity. Visualized segmental labral defects are measured using a piece of suture to allow for measurement of a curved surface and 1.4-mm polyether ether ketone (PEEK) anchors are placed in anticipation of labral fixation. On the back table, the tibialis anterior allograft is prepared for labral reconstruction. We mark a central portion of the graft tissue based on the measured defect size. A 3-0 vicryl suture is used to place a running stitch from one end to the other of the marked portion of the allograft and the marked, prepared graft is sharply divided from the rest of the tissue. Stitches from the anterior and posterior anchors are passed through the graft using a free needle. The graft is then placed through the distal accessory anterolateral portal and positioned into place. The posterolateral and then medial-most anchors are secured and tied using arthroscopic knots, followed by sequential tying of the middle anchors. Any additional arthroscopic procedures, such as cam resection, are performed, and capsular/skin closure is performed using standard methods. Results: Published outcomes support reconstruction of the labrum using allograft, with 2 series consisting of a total of 141 segmental/circumferential reconstructions demonstrating similar outcome scores at 2 years of follow-up as compared to matched cases of primary labral repairs. Discussion/Conclusion: Hip segmental labral reconstruction with tibialis anterior allograft provides a viable surgical option for patients with labral defects precluding primary labral repair. The presented material demonstrates a readily employable technique as well as clear, step-by-step postoperative rehabilitation protocols, and satisfactory published short- and mid-term outcomes literature.