Search

Background Deranged physiology in trauma complicates the clinical identification of sepsis, resulting in overscreening for bacteremia. No clinical signs or biomarkers accurately diagnose sepsis in this population. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of the current criteria used to prompt screening for bacteremia in trauma patients and determine independent predictors of bacteremia. Materials and Methods Adult trauma patients admitted to our level I academic trauma center who had blood cultures (BCs) drawn were identified. Those with positive BCs were compared to those with negative or false positive BCs. False positive was defined as a BC deemed contaminated and not treated at the discretion of the attending physician. Results Over a 2-year period, 366 trauma patients had BCs drawn. After excluding surveillance cultures (those drawn to demonstrate bacteremia clearance), 492 unique BC sets were evaluated; 104 (21.1%) BC sets were positive; 30 (28.8%) of these were falsely positive, resulting in a true-positive rate of 15% in the screened population. Univariate analysis suggested temperature and heart rate were associated with positive BC, while multivariable analysis found only the presence of a central line and lactic acid to be predictive. Procalcitonin (PCT) was poorly predictive, with a positive predictive value of 18% and a negative predictive value of 91%. Conclusion Current tools for identifying bacteremia in trauma patients result in overscreening. PCT may have a limited role as a negative predictor for bacteremia. Given that false-positive BCs have negative patient and economic consequences, future study should focus on development of alternative screening modalities.

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score has never been validated to risk-adjust between critically ill trauma (TICU) and general surgical (SICU) intensive care unit patients, yet it is commonly used for such a purpose. To study this, we evaluated risk of death in TICU and SICU patients with pneumonia. We hypothesized that mortality for a given APACHE II would be significantly different and that using APACHE II to directly compare TICU and SICU patients would not be appropriate. We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted to the TICU or SICU at a tertiary medical center over an 18-month period with pneumonia. Admission APACHE II scores, in-hospital mortality, demographics, and illness characteristics were recorded. One hundred eighty patients met inclusion criteria, 116 in the TICU and 64 in the SICU. Average APACHE II scores were not significantly different in the TICU versus SICU (25 vs 24; P = 0.4607), indicating similar disease severity; overall mortality rates, however, were significantly different (24 vs 50%; P = 0.0004). Components of APACHE II, which contributed to this mortality differential, were Glasgow Coma Score, age, presence of chronic health problems, and operative intervention. APACHE II fails to provide a valid metric to directly compare the severity of disease between TICU and SICU patients with pneumonia. These groups represent distinct populations and should be separated when benchmarking outcomes or creating performance metrics in ICU patients. Improved severity scoring systems are needed to conduct clinically relevant and methodologically valid comparisons between these unique groups.

Emergent operations are thought to carry higher morbidity and mortality than nonemergent cases. However, there is a lack of specific outcomes data for emergent general surgery procedures. The objective of our study was to assess and quantify postoperative morbidity and mortality for emergency versus nonemergency general surgery operations. All general surgery inpatients were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2008 database. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical metrics and occurrences were assessed. A total of 25,770 emergent and 98,867 nonemergent cases were identified. Postoperative morbidity was significantly worse in the emergent group, including ventilation more than 48 hours, bleeding requiring transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, renal failure, and need for reoperation. Overall, emergent cases had significantly more postoperative complications (22.8% vs 14.2%) and higher mortality rates (6.5% vs 1.4%). General surgery patients who undergo emergent operations have significantly poorer outcomes when compared with nonemergent patients; our analysis has quantified these differences. Emergent patients seem to manifest unique clinical, pathophysiologic, and inflammatory responses to their surgical disease. This data suggests that there is a need for improvement in both methods and systems of care for the emergent population.

Based on a large body of literature concerning the subject, trauma surgeons are becoming more comfortable with anastomosis rather than stoma creation in patients with destructive colon injuries requiring resection. This literature was largely generated before the widespread acceptance of the importance of damage control laparotomy (DCL). Thus, when such injuries occur in patients initially left in colonic discontinuity after DCL, the question of anastomosis versus stoma becomes more difficult, and there are no data to guide management decisions. The goal of this report is to describe the results of our early experience with delayed anastomosis (DA) after destructive colon injury in the setting of DCL. We reviewed the records of patients with destructive colon injuries at our Level I trauma center over a 5.5-year period for demographics, injury characteristics, and outcome. Studied outcomes included anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal abscess, and colon injury-related death. The decision to proceed with DA was based on individual surgeon opinion at the time of re-exploration. From January 1, 2000 to July 31, 2006, 92 patients sustained colon injury, 55 of which required resection (31 blunt mechanism and 24 penetrating). Twenty-two resections occurred in the setting of DCL. Six of these patients underwent stoma creation and 11 underwent DA. Three died before reoperation, and two had an anastomosis created during the initial DCL. The remaining 33 resections occurred during initial definitive operation, and 21 underwent anastomosis, whereas 12 had a stoma created. Comparing the 11 patients undergoing DA with the 21 undergoing immediate anastomosis, the anastomotic leak rate (0% vs 5%), abscess rate (36% vs 24%), and colon related-death rate (9% vs 0%; all P > 0.05) were similar. Six patients undergoing DA had a right hemicolectomy with ileocolonic anastomosis, four had a segmental left colon resection, and one had a near total abdominal colectomy with ileosigmoid anastomosis. Delayed anastomosis of colon injuries after DCL is safe in selected patients and has a similar complication rate as resection and anastomosis performed during initial definitive operation. DA avoids stoma creation in some patients who are not candidates for anastomosis during initial DCL. To our knowledge, this represents the first reported series of DA after DCL, an area in which further work is needed to carefully define indications for the safe application of this concept.

Placental abruption (PA) is a common cause of fetal demise in pregnant trauma patients. Diagnosis of PA may be difficult, and multiple diagnostic clues are currently used including uterine/ abdominal pain and tenderness, bleeding, maternal hemodynamic instability, and evidence of PA by ultrasonography or other fetal monitoring. Although diagnosis may be problematic fetal and maternal survival are dependent on early diagnosis and intervention. The purpose of this study is to determine predictive factors present at admission associated with PA in trauma victims. Records of all pregnant trauma patients admitted to Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center over a 5-year period were reviewed for injury characteristics and outcome. Inclusion criteria included a confirmed pregnancy and fetal disposition. Specific admission parameters evaluated included temperature, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, partial pressure of CO2 in arterial blood, total white blood cell count (WBC) and differential, hematocrit, base deficit, and lactic acid. PA is defined as a spontaneous abortion in the first trimester or abruptio placenta in the second or third trimester. Between April 1, 1996 and October 30, 2000, 30 patients met study criteria. Six of 30 patients were found to have PA (20%). Of the studied parameters WBC was significantly elevated in PA patients (27 ± 4.6 vs 17 ± 7.8 WBC x 103/mm3; P = 0.005) as was band count (10 ± 6.6% vs 4 ± 6.1%; P = 0.03). Hematocrit was lower in the PA group (27 ± 4.3% vs 32 ± 5.4%; P = 0.04). Within this group of variables which differed on univariate analysis, WBC was the best discriminator between patients with and without PA (sensitivity 100%, specificity 79%, negative predictive value 100%, and positive predictive value 54%). In pregnant trauma patients WBC >20,000/mm3 on admission should raise suspicion of the possibility of PA, and close monitoring is warranted. Conversely WBC 3 rules out PA in the pregnant trauma patient (negative predictive value of 100%).

Optimal guidelines for empiric antibiotic (EAB) therapy in cases of suspected post-traumatic ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are not well defined. EAB administration is thought to increase the incidence of opportunistic organisms; however, culture-directed (as opposed to empiric) treatment may delay antibiotic administration with possible adverse consequences. Our goal was to examine the impact of EAB administration on the incidence of subsequent VAP and opportunistic organisms in a series of critically injured patients with sepsis syndrome. This is a retrospective review of all patients admitted to a Level I trauma center who underwent multiple fiberoptic bronchoscopies (FOBs) for diagnosis of suspected VAP as the cause of postinjury sepsis syndrome. The relationships between EAB administration, positive cultures (>105 colony-forming units) at repeat FOB, and prevalence of opportunistic organisms (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas species, Acinetobacter species, and/or yeast) were evaluated. Over a 13-month period ending on January 1, 1999, 36 intubated trauma patients underwent more than one FOB during their intensive care unit stay. Twenty-nine patients received EAB immediately after the initial FOB. There was no difference in the rate of EAB administration in patients who developed subsequent VAP after initial FOB (19 of 24,79%) versus those who did not develop VAP (10 of 12, 83%; P = 0.65). There were 30 VAPs diagnosed in 58 subsequent FOBs ( i.e., after the initial FOB) of which 23 were due to an opportunistic organism compared with two VAPs due to an opportunistic organism diagnosed at initial FOB ( P < 0.001). Twenty-one of the 23 opportunistic VAPs at subsequent FOBs had received EAB before the first FOB compared with four of seven nonopportunistic organisms ( P = 0.06). Administration of EAB does not impact the incidence of subsequent VAP. However, EAB may be related to the development of subsequent opportunistic pulmonary infections.

Placement of long-term central venous access devices, such as Hickman catheters and implanted subcutaneous ports, has traditionally been performed in the operating room with fluoroscopy. This study reports our experience with percutaneous placement of these devices in the outpatient clinic setting without the use of real-time imaging. Results were generated from a prospective database of all adult patients undergoing placement of central venous access in the outpatient clinic of the Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center. This database revealed that during the years 1996 and 1997, long-term central venous catheter placement was attempted in 589 adult patients in the outpatient clinic. Technical success was achieved in 558 patients (92%). This included 278 tunneled catheters and 280 totally implanted devices. Repositioning of the catheter tip was required in 16 patients (2.9%). The incidence of pneumothorax was 1.9 per cent. Late complications, including infection and thrombosis, occurred in 9 per cent. The average procedure-related charge for placement of a single-lumen central venous port in the outpatient clinic was $1691 versus $4559 in the operating room and $3890 in the radiology department. We conclude that routine placement of long-term central venous access devices in the outpatient clinic, without the use of real-time imaging, yields acceptable success rates and may have economic advantages over procedures performed in the operating room or radiology department.

Mediastinal impalement injuries are rare and often fatal. Very few instances of survival after mediastinal impalement have been reported. We present the unusual case of an 18-year-old man who was involved in a motor vehicle crash in which a wooden fencepost intruded through the windshield and impaled him through the superior mediastinum. The patient remained hemody-namically stable and had no other significant injuries except a left pneumothorax. Arteriogram revealed a bovine aortic arch with the wooden piece passing over the aortic arch between the two brachiocephalic arteries at the precise point that a normal left common carotid artery would have been located. No other injuries were seen on arteriogram, venogram, or esophagram. The foreign body was extracted via thoracotomy along with resection of the apex of the left lung and ligation of the thoracic duct. The patient was discharged on hospital day eight and was doing quite well at one-year follow-up with no residual effects of his accident.