Search

Objective: Patients with head and neck cancer frequently present to academic tertiary referral centers with imaging studies that have been performed and interpreted elsewhere. At our institution, these outside head and neck imaging studies undergo formal second opinion reporting by a fellowship-trained academic neuroradiologist with expertise in head and neck imaging. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of this practice on cancer staging and patient management., Methods: Our institutional review board approved the retrospective review of randomized original and second opinion reports for 94 consecutive cases of biopsy proven or clinically suspected head and neck cancer in calendar year 2010. Discrepancy rates for staging and recommended patient management were calculated and, for the 32% (30/94) of cases that subsequently went to surgery, the accuracies of the reports were determined relative to the pathologic staging gold standard., Results: Following neuroradiologist second opinion review, the cancer stage changed in 56% (53/94) of cases and the recommended management changed in 38% (36/94) of patients with head and neck cancer. When compared to the pathologic staging gold standard, the second opinion was correct 93% (28/30) of the time., Conclusion: In a majority of patients with head and neck cancer, neuroradiologist second opinion review of their outside imaging studies resulted in an accurate change in their cancer stage and this frequently led to a change in their management plan.

Objective: To understand how newer generation multidetector computed tomographic (NGCT) scanner technology (≥ 16 slices) has affected the imaging characteristics of head and neck abscesses., Design: Retrospective chart review., Setting: Tertiary referral centre., Methods: Forty-eight patients with a head and neck abscess who underwent a soft tissue neck computed tomographic (CT) scan were identified from September 1, 2001, to December 1, 2008. The degree of rim enhancement, delta (Δ), was graded using mean Hounsfield units (HU) from five peripheral points and five central points from a representative CT slice. The difference was then calculated and compared between older generation computed tomography (OGCT; < 16 slices) and newer generation multidetector computed tomography (NGCT; ≥ 16 slices) using the Student t-test. A p value < .05 was considered significant., Results: Forty-eight patients met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 20 were scanned with OGCT and 28 were scanned with NGCT. The mean peripheral point values were OGCT  =  78 HU (95% CI 71-86 HU), NGCT  =  74 HU (95% CI 68-80 HU); p  =  .3. The mean central point values were OGCT  =  24 HU (95% CI 21-28 HU), NGCT  =  26 HU (95% CI 21-31 HU), p  =  0.7. The mean delta values (mean peripheral HU--mean central HU) were OGCT  =  52 HU (95% CI 43-61 HU), NGCT  =  46 HU (95% CI 41-52 HU), p  =  .2., Conclusion: There is no significant difference between OGCT and NGCT in the amount of rim enhancement seen on CT scans of head and neck abscesses.