Search

Introduction: Pharmacovigilance (PV) is designed to monitor drugs continuously after their commercialization, assessing and improving their safety profile. The main objective is to increase the spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), in order to have a wide variety of information. The Italian Drug Agency (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco [AIFA]) is financing several projects to increase reporting. In Calabria, a PV information center has been created in 2010. Materials and Methods: We obtained data using the database of the National Health Information System AIFA relatively to Italy and Calabria in the year 2012. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze the ADRs. Results: A total number of 461 ADRs have been reported in the year 2012 with an increase of 234% compared with 2011 (138 reports). Hospital doctors are the main source of this reporting (51.62%). Sorafenib (Nexavar ® ), the combination of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and ketoprofen represent the drugs most frequently reported causing adverse reactions. Adverse events in female patients (61.83%) were more frequently reported, whereas the age groups “41-65” (39.07%) and “over 65” (27.9%) were the most affected. Conclusions: Calabria has had a positive increase in the number of ADRs reported, although it has not yet reached the gold standard set by World Health Organization (about 600 reports), the data have shown that PV culture is making inroads in this region and that PV projects stimulating and increasing PV knowledge are needed.

Generic drugs are equivalent to the brand formulation if they have the same active substance, the same pharmaceutical form and the same therapeutic indications and a similar bioequivalence respect to the reference medicinal product. The use of generic drugs is indicated from many countries in order to reduce medication price. However some points, such as bioequivalence and the role of excipients, may be clarified regarding the clinical efficacy and safety during the switch from brand to generic formulations. In conclusion, the use of generic drugs could be related with an increased days of disease (time to relapse) or might lead to a therapeutic failure; on the other hand, a higher drug concentration might expose patients to an increased risk of dose-dependent side-effects.

Objective: To report on a patient with epilepsy who developed leukopenia and thrombocytopenia during phenobarbital/lamotrigine treatment. Case Report: A 45-year-old woman with a 10-year history of complex partial seizures being treated with phenobarbital 100 mg/day presented due to the development of complex partial seizure episodes (8 episodes/month in the last 6 months). Results of laboratory tests on admission showed norma! platelets (250 × 103/μL) and white blood cells (8.2 × 103/μL). After clinical evaluation, lamotrigine titrated to a final dose of 100 mg twice daily was added to the phenobarbital. About 2 months later no epileptic manifestations were reported, but hematologic tests revealed a decrease in both platelets (36 × 103/μL) and white blood cells (2.0 × 103/μL). One day later, phenobarbital was discontinued and the patient developed 2 episodes of complex partial seizure. Levetiracetam titrated to 1500 mg/day was added to lamotrigine, with a normalization of platelets (260 × 103/μL) and white blood cell (7.9 × 103/μL) counts about 20 days later. After a few days, levetiracetam was discontinued and phenobarbital rechallenge during lamotrigine treatment induced a new blood dyscrasia in about 2 weeks (platelets 80 × 103/μL; white blood cells 3.2 × 103/μL), Phenobarbital was discontinued and levetiracetam was restarted, with a recovery of normal hematopoiesis in 25 days. The patient is presently receiving treatment with both lamotrigine 200 mg/day and levetiracetam 1500 mg/day and shows no seizure symptoms, blood abnormalities, or other adverse effects. Discussion: Using the Horn Drug Interaction Probability Scale, we estimated a probable relationship between the drug-drug interaction and blood dyscrasia. The underlying mechanism of this interaction has not been well characterized. Cytochrome P450 enzyme induction by phenobarbital could be responsible for the production of reactive metabolites of lamotrigine that might be causative for the observed hematologic effects. A pharmacodynamic interaction between the 2 drugs is also a possible mechanism of this interaction. Conclusions: Our patient with epilepsy developed blood dyscrasia during lamotrigine/phenobarbital treatment. Clinicians should carefully monitor hematologic parameters during lamotrigine/phenobarbital treatment.

Objective: To report a case of unusually low concentrations of methadone in a polydrug abuser during maintenance treatment with methadone. Case Summary: A 25-year-old man (weight 55 kg, height 165 cm) with a 12-year history of polydrug abuse was admitted to an opiates withdrawal methadone program. At the time of our observation, he was using both cannabinoids and heroin; no other medical conditions were discovered. Within the opiates withdrawal methadone program, under medical supervision, the patient started methadone therapy (20 mg/day). Two weeks later, an Abuscreen assay for methadone screening in the urine was negative and, to prevent the development of withdrawal symptoms, the dose of methadone was increased to 60 mg/day. One day later, the patient was asked to collect another urine sample in the presence of a nurse. The Abuscreen for methadone in urine remained negative. Evaluation of urinary samples collected over 24 hours documented low concentrations of methadone and high levels of 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (the primary metabolite of methadone). Evaluation for the presence of the most common polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 and P-glycoprotein genes showed that the patient was heterozygous for the CYP3A531 allele and for 2 single nucleotide polymorphisms in the P-glycoprotein gene (1236C/T and 3435C/T). Discussion: In this patient, poor methadone adherence was ruled out because of the presence of physicians and nurses during both methadone maintenance treatment and Abuscreen screening. Moreover, because the patient reported only heroin and cannabis at the time of evaluation, drug interactions were ruled out as possible causes for the rapid clearance of methadone. Conclusions: In this case, CYP3A5 polymorphism may have played a role in the rapid methadone metabolism.

Objective: To report a case of visual hallucinations and psychomotor agitation probably induced by an interaction between venlafaxine and propafenone. Case Summary: An 85-year-old woman was admitted for evaluation of a mood disorder on March 20, 2006. Her general practitioner had prescribed sertraline for treatment, which had started about 6 months earlier. The patient's medical history included hypertension, supraventricular tachycardia, chronic bronchitis, and arthritis, for which she received ramipril, ticlopidine, torsemide, theophylline, acetaminophen, and triazolam. The patient had also received propafenone 150 mg every 12 hours for 3 years. Results of biochemical tests were normal; however, a computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain showed signs of cortical atrophy. Sertraline was discontinued after a few days because of its reduced effectiveness and was replaced with extended-re lease venlafaxine 75 mg/day. No other changes to the patient's drug therapy were made. Four weeks later, because of the persistence of psychiatric disturbance, the venlafaxine dosage was increased to 150 mg/day. Ten days later the patient returned to our observation due to the onset of visual hallucinations lasting about 2 hours, especially at night, and psychomotor agitation. Venlafaxine was discontinued, with a complete remission of hallucinations and psychomotor agitation in about 4 days. The Naranjo probability scale indicated a probable relationship between venlafaxine and the patient's symptoms. Citalopram was started one month later for the persistence of mood disorders, with no adverse effects. Discussion: A CT scan documented signs of cortical atrophy in our patient's brain but excluded vascular brain injury, while clinical evaluation and anamnesis excluded a relationship between hallucinations and cortical atrophy. Genetic and pharmacologic factors may be involved in venlafaxine-induced adverse effects. Venlafaxine is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and is a substrate of P-glycoprotein. Propafenone, a known substrate and inhibitor of both CYP2D6 and P-glycoprotein, could therefore be involved in venlafaxine-induced hallucinations through the increase of venlafaxine plasma concentrations. Conclusions: To prevent the onset of clinical disturbances during venlafaxine treatment, we suggest careful evaluation of concomitant treatment with CYP2D6 or P-glycoprotein inhibitors (eg, propafenone) and, when possible, venlafaxine serum concentration monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To report on a patient with trigeminal neuralgia who responded positively to combined carbamazepine/oxycodone treatment. CASE SUMMARY: A 48-year-old woman with a 4-month history of left facial pain consisting of episodes lasting less than 5 minutes was brought to our institution for clinical evaluation. Clinical, laboratory, and neuroradiologic findings led to a diagnosis of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Carbamazepine treatment was started at 200 mg every 12 hours and increased at discharge to 300 mg every 8 hours. Two weeks later the patient was readmitted with trigeminal neuralgia symptoms that had persisted since the previous admission, although they had decreased in intensity. Carbamazepine was reduced to 200 mg every 8 hours and oxycodone 5 mg every 12 hours was added to the treatment regimen, with a complete resolution of pain within 7 days. DISCUSSION: Pathophysiological mechanisms involved in both the genesis and the maintenance of trigeminal neuralgia have not yet been defined. Several hypotheses could explain this disorder, ranging from peripheral neural ectopic pacemaker to central disinhibition. Both the interruption of the sodium channel and the modulation of both κ-and μ-opioid receptors contributed to antinociceptive effects in trigeminal neuralgia. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a combination of carbamazepine, a sodium channel blocker, and oxycodone, a mixed κ-and μ-opioid receptor agonist, may be useful in alleviating symptoms of trigeminal neuralgia.