Search

Background: Treatment options for pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries include early operative, delayed operative, and nonoperative management. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal treatment for these injuries. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to determine the optimal treatment strategy for ACL injuries in pediatric and adolescent patients. We hypothesized that (1) early ACL reconstruction results in fewer meniscal tears than delayed reconstruction but yields no difference in knee stability and (2) when compared with nonoperative management, any operative management results in fewer meniscal tears and cartilage injuries, greater knee stability, and higher return-to-sport rates. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic search of databases was performed including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were a pediatric and adolescent patient population (≤19 years old at surgery), the reporting of clinical outcomes after treatment of primary ACL injury, and original scientific research article. Exclusion criteria were revision ACL reconstruction, tibial spine avulsion fracture, case report or small case series (Results: A total of 30 studies containing 50 cohorts and representing 1176 patients met our criteria. With respect to nonoperative treatment, knee instability was observed in 20% to 100%, and return to preinjury level of sports ranged from 6% to 50% at final follow-up. Regarding operative treatment, meta-analysis results favored early ACL reconstruction over delayed reconstruction (>12 weeks) for the presence of any meniscal tear (odds ratio, 0.23; P = .006) and irreparable meniscal tear (odds ratio, 0.31; P = .001). Comparison of any side-to-side differences in KT-1000 arthrometer testing did not favor early or delayed ACL reconstruction in either continuous mean differences ( P = .413) or proportion with difference ≥3 mm ( P = .181). Return to preinjury level of competition rates for early and delayed ACL reconstruction ranged from 57% to 100%. Conclusion: Delaying ACL reconstruction in pediatric or adolescent patients for >12 weeks significantly increased the risk of meniscal injuries and irreparable meniscal tears; however, early and delayed operative treatment achieved satisfactory knee stability. Nonoperative management resulted in high rates of residual knee instability, increased risk of meniscal tears, and comparatively low rates of return to sports.

Objectives: The most common presentation of knee osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a stable lesion on the lateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle (MFC) in an adolescent or pre-adolescent athlete. The standard of care for primary treatment is non-operative, and includes rest/activity modification and often weight bearing protection or bracing. Failed conservative management often leads arthroscopy and drilling of the lesion. Two different primary drilling techniques have been utilized, but no prospective studies have compared their relative effectiveness. The study hypothesis was that retro-articular drilling (RAD), the slightly newer technique, would not be inferior to trans-articular (TAD), with regard to rate of healing, time to return to sports (RTS), and patient-reported outcome scores (PROs). Methods: Skeletally immature (n=113) patients presenting with MRI-confirmed stable OCD of the MFC who did not demonstrate substantial healing after a minimum of 3 months of non-operative treatment were prospectively enrolled by one of seventeen surgeon-investigators (at 14 centers, representing all major geographic regions in the U.S.) and randomized to TAD or RAD. Post-operatively, serial radiographs were obtained every 6 weeks to assess healing, and PROs were obtained at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Twelve patients were closed out at time of surgery due to lesion instability detected during arthroscopy. Power analysis determined that in order to detect a difference in 2-year IKDC score between RA and TA groups with 80% power, sample sizes of 37 subjects per group would be required if the true standard deviation were 15. This analysis was based on conducting an independent samples Student’s t-test with alpha set to 5%. Results: Ninety-one study subjects were included, consisting of 51 TAD and 40 RAD patients, respectively, with the two groups being similar in age (12.6 years vs. 11.9 years), sex distribution (45% vs. 27% female, p=0.081), and 2-year PRO response rate (both 90%). No significant differences between TAD and RAD were detected in follow-up Pedi-IKDC, Lysholm, Marx knee activity score, or KOOS QOL scores (Table 1). Revision/additional OCD surgery occurred in 10% of patients in RAD and 4% in TAD (p=0.40). 73% of TAD patients reached a ‘healed’ status at a mean of 1.15 years, compared with 60% RAD patients at a mean of 1.21 years. Conclusions: While both primary forms of OCD drilling (TAD and RAD) showed consistent post-operative healing, achieving a completely ‘healed’ status was often a more prolonged process, taking approximately 1 year, despite clinical improvement and RTS being achieved much sooner. PROs were similar between drilling techniques. Significantly higher powered studies are needed to better elucidate the greater revision surgery rates in RAD compared with TAD, but overall risk is low and absolute risk only 6%. The current data support either drilling technique, which may be technically simpler, without the need for fluoroscopy, with TAD, and may be more protective of the chondral articular surface with RAD.