Search

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common tumor in women and represents the leading cause of cancer death. Radiation therapy plays a key-role in the treatment of all breast cancer stages. Therefore, the adoption of evidence-based treatments is warranted, to ensure equity of access and standardization of care in clinical practice., Method: This national document on the highest evidence-based available data was developed and endorsed by the Italian Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group.We analyzed literature data regarding breast radiation therapy, using the SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) methodology (www.sign.ac.uk). Updated findings from the literature were examined, including the highest levels of evidence (meta-analyses, randomized trials, and international guidelines) with a significant impact on clinical practice. The document deals with the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer, local relapse, and metastatic disease, with focus on diagnosis, staging, local and systemic therapies, and follow up. Information is given on indications, techniques, total doses, and fractionations., Results: An extensive literature review from 2013 to 2021 was performed. The work was organized according to a general index of different topics and most chapters included individual questions and, when possible, synoptic and summary tables. Indications for radiation therapy in breast cancer were examined and integrated with other oncological treatments. A total of 50 questions were analyzed and answered.Four large areas of interest were investigated: (1) general strategy (multidisciplinary approach, contraindications, preliminary assessments, staging and management of patients with electronic devices); (2) systemic therapy (primary, adjuvant, in metastatic setting); (3) clinical aspects (invasive, non-invasive and micro-invasive carcinoma; particular situations such as young and elderly patients, breast cancer in males and cancer during pregnancy; follow up with possible acute and late toxicities; loco-regional relapse and metastatic disease); (4) technical aspects (radiation after conservative surgery or mastectomy, indications for boost, lymph node radiotherapy and partial breast irradiation).Appendixes about tumor bed boost and breast and lymph nodes contouring were implemented, including a dedicated web application. The scientific work was reviewed and validated by an expert group of breast cancer key-opinion leaders., Conclusions: Optimal breast cancer management requires a multidisciplinary approach sharing therapeutic strategies with the other involved specialists and the patient, within a coordinated and dedicated clinical path. In recent years, the high-level quality radiation therapy has shown a significant impact on local control and survival of breast cancer patients. Therefore, it is necessary to offer and guarantee accurate treatments according to the best standards of evidence-based medicine.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the planned dose distribution and acute toxicity of adjuvant hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy (RT) delivered in the prone vs. supine position., Methods: Twenty-four patients were enrolled; 12 underwent adjuvant RT with a supine setup and 12 with a prone setup. We included patients according to breast volume (≥500 mL), disease stage (≤pT2/pN1), and clinical/biological features. Patients received a regimen of 35 Gy in 10 fractions for 2.5 weeks, and a concomitant boost of 3/4 Gy in 1 fraction/week. Target coverage was assessed by volume, V90, V95, V100, V103 and V105. Heart, LADCA and ipsilateral lung doses were evaluated according to volume, maximum dose, mean dose, V14, V10 and V5. We evaluated acute skin toxicity during RT, at the end of treatment, and after 1 month according to RTOG scales., Results: Radiobiological equivalence was warranted with satisfactory BED values: considering α/β = 4 for breast cancer, the 10-fraction schedule equaled 74 or 77 Gy depending on the boost dose (3 Gy vs. 4 Gy, respectively). Toxicity was low and similar for supine and prone treatments. Dose sparing was significant in the ipsilateral lung in the prone position (median Dmax: 28.7 Gy vs. 38.4 Gy; median Dmean: 0.8 Gy vs. 6.3 Gy; median V14: 0.6% vs. 13.5%; median V5: 0 vs. 19.3%, p<0.001)., Conclusions: This novel 10-fraction schedule is feasible and well tolerated; the prone position allows better saving of OARs, with a statistically significant value for the ipsilateral lung.

Aims and Background: To report the 5-year minimum follow-up in low-risk breast cancer patients treated with a double-lumen balloon-brachytherapy device in one mono-institutional Italian experience. Local control data and cosmetic outcomes were collected and analyzed., Methods: Between October 2004 and December 2007, we treated 30 early stage breast cancer patients who underwent conservative surgery followed by adjuvant accelerated partial breast irradiation with a double-lumen balloon-brachytherapy system. Eligibility criteria for the protocol were based on the indications of the American Brachytherapy Society and the American Society of Breast Surgeons. The device was placed inside the lumpectomy cavity during surgery by open technique in all the patients. Computed tomography images and standard X-ray were used for treatment planning. The total irradiation dose was 34 Gy in 10 fractions of 3.4 Gy (twice daily) over 5 days to the lumpectomy cavity., Results: Median follow-up was 80.5 months (range, 60-98). No patient developed local recurrence or distant metastasis. At the end of treatment, there was evidence of a symptomatic seroma in 83% of the total patients, with a yearly decreasing trend. However, the incidence of mild and moderate fibrosis progressively increased. Seventy-seven percent of the patients were satisfied with their cosmetic results., Conclusions: Our findings reinforce the hypothesis that an accelerated double-lumen balloon-breast brachytherapy catheter in selected low-risk patients is safe, and a favorable cosmetic outcome can be achieved.

Introducing a Quality Assurance methodology appears particularly useful in Radiation Oncology due to the complexity of the procedures involved and the heterogeneity of the standards adopted, if any, in the great majority of the Centers. There are two possible ways of evaluating quality in the Health Environment: a formal, Institutional certification, or a voluntary one obtained through a mechanism of peer review. The European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) started in 1994 with the publication of a methodological Report intended to be adopted by the individual national Societies, and this paper is an invitation to do it.

Patients with intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma are rarely cured of their disease after the failure of conventional therapy. Autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) offers such patients a new possibility of cure. Our purpose was to evaluate the usefulness of radiotherapy. In these patients who did not achieve complete remission of disease after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by ABMT or who had previous bulky disease. In this study we examined 10 patients: after HDCT+ABMT, 9 patients had persistent disease and 1 patient with previous bulky disease was in complete remission. All patients underwent involved-field radiotherapy administered by a 6-18 MV linear accelerator, total mean dose 4000 cGy (range, 3200-5000 cGy). At the end of radiotherapy we observed 6 complete responses and 4 progressions of disease outside the radiotherapy field. No serious side effects were observed. To date, of the 6 complete responses 2 have relapsed (after 9 and 11 months) and 4 are alive and disease free at 24 months (range, 8-39 months) after radiotherapy. In our opinion, radiotherapy is an effective treatment after HDCT+ABMT and may have a role in a prospective multidisciplinary approach.

Aims and Background: Malignant melanoma is one of the most radioresistant tumors. It can be treated with combinated hyperthermia and radiation therapy., Methods: From January 1991 through June 1992, 7 patients, 1 male and 6 female, aged 40-88 years (mean 75), with skin and nodal post-surgical recurrences of melanoma, were treated with a combination of radiation therapy and hyperthermia. Two patients presented systemic disease when they reached our observation, but all of them were without symptoms. None of them underwent surgical excision of the recurrence before or during thermoradiotherapy. None received chemotherapy for these recurrences or had received radiotherapy in the past. They were irradiated with electron beams, with electron energies selected according to the depth of the lesions. The total dose was 40 Gy in 10 fractions in 5 weeks. Hyperthermia was administered for 10 minutes to 1 hour after irradiation. An inductive method of radiofrequency heating at 434 of 915 MHz was used depending on the depth of the lesions. In all of these treatments a ionized water bolus was used. The prescribed hyperthermic dose was 42 degrees C for half a hour. The treatments were carried out twice a week for 5 weeks. A fiberoptic multichannel thermometer was used for thermometry., Results: Four patients (57%) achieved a complete response, 2 patients (29%) a partial response, and 1 patient (14%) stabilization. We found no correlation between tumor volume and response rate. Site effects and complications of the treatment were minimal (moderate erythema)., Conclusions: Our results are in the wide range of values reported in the literature.