Search

Introduction: BIC/FTC/TAF showed efficacy and tolerability in randomized trials as a switch strategy in virologically-suppressed people living with HIV. We evaluated its effectiveness in a real-life setting., Methods: A retrospective monocentric cohort including 431 virologically-suppressed (HIV-RNA <50 copies/ml) people switching to BIC/FTC/TAF in the period 2018-2022 was evaluated. Probabilities of virological failure (VF, i.e.2 consecutive HIV-RNA ≥50 copies/ml or a single HIV-RNA ≥200 copies/ml) and of treatment discontinuation (TD) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier, and predictors of both outcomes were identified through multivariable Cox regression. Analysis-of-variance for repeated measures was used to examine changes in CD4 count and CD4-to-CD8 ratio., Results: Overall, 16 VF occurred during 22 months of median follow-up time. Estimated probabilities of VF at 1, 2 and 3 years were 2.0% (95% CI 1.04.2%), 2.9% (95% CI 1.5%-5.6%) and 5.5% (95% CI 3.2%-9.2%), respectively. Caucasian ethnicity and a history of previous VF independently predicted VF. TD occurred in 42 cases, predominantly for simplification. One discontinuation due to VF was reported. No predictors of discontinuation were identified. An increase in CD4-to-CD8 ratio over 3 years was evidenced ( p < 0.001). Total cholesterol decreased over 3 years ( p < 0.001). Triglycerides did not significantly change ( p = 0.465)., Conclusions: BIC/FTC/TAF demonstrated high effectiveness, tolerability and safety., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.C. received support for travel to meetings from ViiV Healthcare, A.B. received speakers’ honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, and fees for attending advisory boards from Janssen-Cilag. SD.G. was a paid consultant or member of advisory boards for Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, Janssen-Cilag, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Bristol-Myers Squibb. All other authors: none to declare.

Background: Doravirine (DOR) is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) approved for HIV-1 infection treatment. Because of its genetic barrier, DOR appears to be a good alternative in switch strategies compared to other NNRTI. Our aim was to evaluate the percentage of people living with HIV (PLWHIV) followed in our center who could be eligible to a DOR-based regimen., Methods: We collected data from all treatment-experienced PLWHIV, never exposed to DOR and with a demonstrated virological suppression. We analyzed previous genotypic analyses, clinical history, and previous exposure to NNRTIs., Results: We analyzed data from 653 patients, whose characteristics are shown in Table 1. 59% of them presented no resistance mutation (RAM) at genotypic analysis. The most common DOR-related RAM were V106A, Y181V, and Y188L. We also analyzed RAM that can possibly interfere with combination therapy (mostly K65R and M184V). In the end, 81.8% of our patients results to be eligible for a DOR-based therapy regimen., Conclusions: DOR represents a good option for switch strategies in virological suppressed PLWHIV. It seems to have a higher genetic barrier and a lower risk for resistance mutation development compared to other NNRTI. In our cohort, we found 81.8% of patients who could be eligible for a regimen containing DOR and almost 2/3 of patients who can be treated with the fixed-dose combination DOR/3TC/TDF.