Search

Background:During high tibial osteotomy (HTO), the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) is cut or released at any degree to expose the osteotomy site and achieve the targeted alignment correction according to the surgeon’s preference. However, it is still unclear whether transection of sMCL increases valgus laxity.Purpose:We aimed to assess the outcomes and safety of sMCL transection, especially focusing on iatrogenic valgus instability.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Seventy-two patients (89 knees) who underwent medial open wedge HTO (MOWHTO) with transection of the sMCL between October 2013 and September 2018 were retrospectively investigated. Clinical evaluations, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Tegner and Lysholm scores, were performed preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. The radiographic parameters hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, joint line convergence angle on standing radiographs (standing JLCA), and weightbearing line (WBL) ratio were assessed preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. To evaluate valgus laxity, we assessed the valgus JLCA and medial joint opening (MJO) at the aforementioned time points using valgus stress radiographs.Results:All clinical results at the 2-year follow-up were significantly improved compared with those obtained at the preoperative assessment ( P < .001). The postoperative HKA angle significantly differed from the preoperative one, and no significant valgus progression was observed during follow-up (preoperative, 8.5°± 2.7°; 3 months, –3.5°± 2.0°; 6 months, –3.2°± 2.3°; 1 year, –3.1°± 2.3°; 2 years, –2.9°± 2.5°; P < .001) The mean WBL ratio was 62.5% ± 9.0% at 2 years postoperatively. The postoperative valgus JLCA at all follow-up points did not significantly change compared with the preoperative valgus JLCA (preoperative, –0.1°± 2.1°; 3 months, –0.2°± 2.4°; 6 months, –0.1°± 2.5°; 1 year, 0.1°± 2.5°; 2 years, 0.2°± 2.2°) The postoperative MJO at all follow-up points did not significantly change compared with the preoperative MJO (preoperative, 7.1 ± 1.7 mm; 3 months, 7.0 ± 1.7 mm; 6 months, 6.9 ± 1.9 mm; 1 year, 6.7 ± 1.8 mm; 2 years, 6.8 ± 1.8 mm).Conclusion:Transection of the sMCL during MOWHTO does not increase valgus laxity and could yield desirable clinical and radiographic results.

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes among three analgesic techniques, continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB), epidural patient-controlled analgesia (EPCA) and periarticular injection (PAI), in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods This retrospective case–control study enrolled patients that underwent TKA. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, sleep disturbance, additional opioid consumption and incidence of opioid-related side-effects were assessed. Results A total of 120 patients were categorized into three groups: EPCA (group A, n = 40), PAI (group B, n = 40) and CFNB (group C, n = 40). Group C had significantly lower VAS pain scores than groups A and B at 8, 12 and 24 h after TKA. There were no significant differences in VAS pain scores among the three groups from 48 h after TKA. Sleep quality on the first day after surgery was significantly better in group C than in groups A and B. Additional opioid consumption was significantly lower in the group C than in the groups A and B. Group C showed a lower rate of opioid-related side-effects than groups A and B. Conclusion CFNB was a more effective additional analgesic technique than EPCA or PAI for acute postoperative pain control within 24 h of TKA.

Background:Soft tissue laxity around the knee joint has been recognized as a crucial factor affecting correction error during medial open-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy (MOWPTO). Medial laxity in particular, which represents the changes in joint-line convergence angle (JLCA), affects soft tissue correction.Purpose:The purpose of this study was to quantify medial laxity and develop a preoperative planning method that considers medial laxity.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This study retrospectively reviewed 139 knees in 117 patients who underwent navigation-assisted MOWPTO from January 2014 to July 2019 for symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis with varus alignment >5°. We compared the results of 2 preoperative planning methods: conventional Miniaci (n = 47) and latent medial laxity reduction (LMLR) (n = 92). We evaluated the incidence of undercorrection, acceptable correction, and overcorrection. The radiologic parameters were analyzed using multiple linear regression with a stepwise selection model to establish an equation for the optimal preoperative planning method. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of intraobserver, interobserver, and intermethod reliability were calculated.Results:The Miniaci method showed a higher incidence of overcorrection (55.3%) than the LMLR method (22.8%) at postoperative 6 months ( P = .0006). Multiple linear regression with a stepwise selection model revealed a high correlation coefficient ( R2= 0.888) for the following equation: Adjusted planned correction angle = 0.596 + 0.891 × Target correction angle – 0.255 × Δ JLCAvalgus. Upon simplification, the following equation showed the highest intermethod ICC value (0.991): Target correction angle – ⅓Δ JLCAvalgus, while the Miniaci method showed a relatively low ICC value of 0.875.Conclusion:There was a risk of overcorrection after MOWPTO using the conventional Miniaci method. An equation that considers medial laxity may help during preoperative planning for optimal correction during MOWPTO.

Background: After posterior cruciate ligament injury, stress radiography is a common method of quantifying posterior instability, defined as the side-to-side difference in posterior tibial displacement (PTD) between the injured knee and contralateral noninjured knee. However, no study has evaluated the reliability of PTD according to knee flexion angle (KFA) measurements on stress radiographs. Purpose: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of stress radiographic measurements of the KFA in the noninjured knee. In addition, we established a reliable range of KFAs to indicate posterior instability by comparing results with the instability measured at 90° KFA, which is considered the gold standard. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We evaluated patients who had undergone bilateral stress radiographic examinations at least 5 times for ligament injuries between January 2013 and November 2019. All examinations were performed on a Telos device with a 150-N posterior load. A total of 120 knees and 644 stress radiographs were enrolled. We measured the KFA and PTD on stress radiographs and evaluated the reliability of repeated PTD measurement and the correlation between KFA and PTD. Results: The distribution of the actual noninjured knee KFA ranged from 56.9° to 106.7°. Among the 644 radiographs, 155 (24.1%) showed KFAs between 85° and 95°, and 287 (44.6%) showed KFAs between 80° and 85°. A significant correlation was found between KFA and PTD ( P < .001), and the intrapatient intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.788. A KFA range of 85° to 92° satisfied the criteria of high ICC (0.885) and nonsignificant correlation between KFA and PTD ( P = .055) and thus was considered a reliable range of KFAs for quantifying posterior instability. We found no significant risk factors for measurement error, including age ( P = .674), sex ( P = .328), height ( P = .957), weight ( P = .248), or body mass index ( P = .257). Conclusion: We found high reproducibility of posterior displacement measurements on Telos stress radiography at a KFA of 85° to 92° in noninjured knees.

Biological repair of cartilage lesions remains a significant clinical challenge. A wide variety of methods involving mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been introduced. Because of the limitation of the results, most of the treatment methods have not yet been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and human umbilical cord blood derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs) implantation were approved by Korea FDA. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes after two different types of MSCs implantation in knee osteoarthritis. Fifty-two patients (52 knees) who underwent cartilage repair surgery using the BMAC (25 knees) and hUCB-MSCs (27 knees) were retrospectively evaluated for 2 years after surgery. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to the score of visual analogue scale (VAS), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Cartilage repair was assessed according to the modified Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (M-MOCART) score and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) cartilage repair scoring system. At 2-year follow-up, clinical outcomes including VAS, IKDC, and KOOS significantly improved ( P < 0.05) in both groups; however, there were no differences between two groups. There was no significant difference in M-MOCART [1-year ( P = 0.261), 2-year ( P = 0.351)] and ICRS repair score ( P = 0.655) between two groups. Both groups showed satisfactory clinical and MRI outcomes. Implantation of MSCs from BMAC or hUCB-MSCs is safe and effective for repairing cartilage lesion. However, large cases and a well-controlled prospective design with long-term follow-up studies are needed.