Search

Over the past 20 years, the field of robotic surgery has largely been dominated by the da Vinci robotic platform. Nevertheless, numerous novel multiport robotic surgical systems have been developed over the past decade, and some have recently been introduced into clinical practice. This nonsystematic review aims to describe novel surgical robotic systems, their individual designs, and their reported uses and clinical outcomes within the field of urologic surgery. Specifically, we performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the use of the Senhance robotic system, the CMR-Versius robotic system, and the Hugo RAS in urologic procedures. Systems with fewer published uses are also described, including the Avatera, Hintori, and Dexter. Notable features of each system are compared, with a particular emphasis on factors differentiating each system from the da Vinci robotic system., Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Unlabelled: UNLABELLED: The aim of our study is to evaluate the status of positive margins (PSMs) comparing their incidence between aparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in centers with medium case-load (50-150 cases/year). We also analyzed the correlations between surgical technique, nerve-sparing approach (NS), and incidence of PSMs, stratifying our results by pathological stage., Materials and Methods: We analyzed 1992 patients who underwent RP in various urologic centers. We evaluated the incidence of PSMs, and then we compared the stage-related incidence of PSMs, for both the techniques., Results: We did not find a statistically significant difference between the two surgical modalities in the study regarding the overall incidence of PSMs., Conclusions: In our retrospective study, we did not find any difference in terms of PSMs in RARP versus LRP. Our PSMs were not negligible, particularly in pT3 stages, compared with high-volume centers; surgical experience and patients' selection can be a possible explanation.

Prostatic fluid collection is not uncommon in urological practice. Prostatic abscess is the most frequent finding in this clinical setting. Spontaneous prostatic hematoma is rare, and may be related to prostatic cancer. Every case of prostatic collection must be considered with attention, and further evaluation is needed when the diagnosis is not clear. Here we report the case of a spontaneous prostatic hematoma, which was eventually found to be due to prostatic cancer, describing in detail the clinical features, differential diagnosis and treatment options.

Urethral hemangiomas are rare and benign tumors, probably originating from a unipotent angioblastic stem cell. They can vary in size and the clinical appearance can range from asymptomatic lesions to urethral bleeding or gross hematuria. We present the case of an 18-year-old male, with a history of urethral bleeding. Cystourethoscopy revealed a solitary bulging mass into the lumen, about 6 cm far from the external meatus. Doppler study confirmed that the lesion was in communication with the vessels of the left spongious body. The patient underwent surgical removal of the lesion. The post-procedure Doppler study revealed an inflammation-based remodeling of the spongoius urethra and the absence of the previous vascular connection. At the time of publication the patient is still symptom-free. The surgical removal of urethral hemangiomas is by far the technique of choice for treating such lesions in young patients, thus avoiding side effects of LASER treatments.

Purpose: Many methods have been suggested to assess bladder outlet obstruction, as defined by the gold standard of pressure flow studies. A comprehensive review of the literature on the different methods used to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction by non-invasive means was performed in order to compare those methods to invasive urodynamics in terms of sensitivity and specificity., Materials and Methods: A MEDLINE search was done of the published literature covering from December 2003 on non-invasive methods, including only single measures to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction. We performed a comparison between all methods in terms of sensitivity and specificity for each test. For many techniques these values were calculated directly from the data presented in the article., Results: There has been applied many methods to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction. Those methods were divided into uroflowmetry, condom-catheter method, penile cuff method and Doppler ultrasonography urodynamics. Each method has been described and discussed in terms of its role in adding information to the diagnostic work-up for bladder outlet obstruction., Conclusions: Pressure flow studies still remain the gold standard for assessing bladder outlet obstruction. However non-invasive urodynamics is a promising branch. Probably the most reliable information is given by the association of numerous methods together.