Search

Background: To date, there are no available factors to predict the outcome after multiple sclerosis relapse., Aim: To investigate factors that may be useful for predicting response to methylprednisolone treatment, following a relapse of multiple sclerosis (MS)., Methods: The study included 48 MS patients enrolled in a double-blind multicenter trial to receive intravenous versus oral high-dose methylprednisolone treatment. Associations were sought between the disability status prior to relapse and the relapse severity, determined by changes in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, as well as the improvements after treatment. We also analyzed the relationships between the number of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) gadolinium-enhancing lesions (Gd+) and improvement., Results: A higher EDSS score before relapse was associated with more severe relapses (p = 0.04) and less marked improvement (odds ratio (OR) 1.8; 95% CI (1.2-2.2); p = 0.05) after methylprednisolone treatment. Relapse severity (p = 0.29) and the number of Gd+ lesions at relapse (p = 0.41) were not related with improvement., Conclusions: Clinical baseline status prior to MS relapse is a predictor of response to methylprednisolone treatment., (© The Author(s), 2015.)

Unlabelled: Our aim was to investigate differences in immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse, after high-dose oral methylprednisolone (oMP) or intravenous methylprednisolone (ivMP). We measured serum cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α and IFN-γ) in 39 of 49 MS patients with moderate-severe relapse, whom were treated with ivMP or oMP in a placebo-controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial. We assessed these cytokine levels at baseline and at 1 and 4 weeks post-treatment. The cytokine levels between oMP and ivMP were similar at any time. Proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and IFN-γ) were significantly decreased in both groups at week 1 (p = 0.05 / p = 0.03) and at week 4 (p = 0.04 / p = 0.05). This study provides further confirmatory evidence that oMP is not inferior to ivMP., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00753792., (© The Author(s), 2014.)

Background: Steroids improve multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses but therapeutic window and dose, frequency and administration route remain uncertain., Objective: The objective of this paper is to compare the clinical and radiologic efficacy, tolerability and safety of intravenous methylprednisolone (ivMP) vs oral methylprednisolone (oMP), at equivalent high doses, for MS relapse., Methods: Forty-nine patients with moderate or severe relapse within the previous 15 days were randomized in a double-blind, noninferiority, multicenter trial to receive ivMP or oMP and their matching placebos. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were determined at baseline and weeks 1, 4 and 12. Brain MRI were assessed at baseline and at weeks 1 and 4. Primary endpoint was a noninferiority assessment of EDSS improvement at four weeks (noninferiority margin of one point), with further key efficacy assessments of number and volume of T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+), and new or enlarged T2 lesions at four weeks' post-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability., Results: The study achieved the main outcome of noninferiority at four weeks for improved EDSS score. No differences were found between ivMP and oMP in the number of Gd+ lesions (0 (0-1) vs 0 (0-0.5), p = 0.630), volume of Gd+ lesions (0 (0-88.0) vs 0 (0-32.9) mm(3), p = 0.735), or new or enlarged T2 lesions (0 (0-194) vs 0 (0-123), p = 0.769). MP was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported., Conclusions: This study provides confirmatory evidence that oMP is not inferior to ivMP in reducing EDSS, similar in MRI lesions at four weeks for MS relapses and is equally well tolerated and safe., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00753792.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease, which represents a great economic burden to society. Cost-of-illness studies of MS tend to underestimate the intangible costs related to pain, anxiety and helplessness. The purpose of this study was to estimate the intangible costs of MS, and determine whether these costs increase as disability progresses. We studied 211 consecutive patients with MS who attended our MS unit. Patients mean age was 41.6 (SD: 10.7) years, 69% were female, and their mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 2.47 (SD: 2.05). Quality-of-life was measured with the EuroQoL visual analogue scale. Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was calculated for each patient. Patients were grouped into five disability stages according to their EDSS, and QALY was compared between patients and a group of healthy controls matched by age and sex. A benchmark value was ascribed to each QALY lost, and the intangible costs per patient-year were calculated as Euros 0 (EDSS =0), Euros 1100 (EDSS =1-3), Euros 8250 (EDSS =3.5-5.5), Euros 9900 (EDSS =6-7) and Euros 11,000 (EDSS >7.5). Sensitivity analysis showed a similar progression of costs. We conclude that intangible costs are relevant in MS, especially when disability increases. Although the method to calculate the costs remains controversial, we consider that they should be included in cost analysis of MS.

In order to ensure sufficient disease activity, patients with relapsing remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS) are often included in randomized placebo-controlled trials, only if they have a high baseline activity. These patients, whose evolution is unusual in the pre-study period, will tend to show a more usual behavior when followed up over a period of time. This phenomenon is known as regression to the mean. Regression to the mean should be taken into account in correctly interpreting long-term studies of cohorts treated without a placebo control group, which use the baseline period as control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of this phenomenon in a non-treated cohort of RRMS patients, selected with similar criteria to those used in randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. Forty-four patients with definite RRMS, with two or more relapses in the previous two years, and a baseline EDSS < or = 5.5 were prospectively followed. The mean number of relapses spontaneously decreased from 1.72 (SD: 1.4) in the year prior to enrolment, to 1.0 (SD: 1.3) during the first year of follow-up (P < 0.05). Regression to the mean may explain as much as 40% of the reduction in the relapse rate from the baseline period to the period on-study.