Search

Background: Persistent critical illness is a recognisable clinical syndrome defined conceptually as when the patient's reason for being in the intensive care unit (ICU) is more related to their ongoing critical illness than their original reason for admission. Our objectives were: (1) to assess the day in ICU on which chronic factors (e.g., age, gender and comorbidities) were more predictive of survival than acute factors (e.g. admission diagnosis, physiological derangements) measured on the day of admission; (2) to assess the consistency of this finding across major patient subgroups and over time and (3) to compare case mix characteristics and outcomes for patients determined to develop persistent critical illness (based on ICU length of stay) with other patients., Methods: Observational cohort study using a high-quality clinical database from the national clinical audit of adult critical care. 217 adult ICUs in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. 835,946 adult patients admitted to participating ICUs between 1 April 2009 and 31 March 2016. The main outcome measure was mortality at discharge from acute hospital., Results: We fitted two statistical models ('chronic' and 'acute') and updated these based upon patients with an ICU length of stay of at least 1, 2, etc., up to 28 days. The discrimination of the chronic model first exceeded that of the acute model on day 11. Patients with longer stays (>10 days) comprised 9% of admissions but used 45% of ICU bed-days. After a mean ICU length of stay of 22 days and a subsequent 28 days in hospital, 30% died., Conclusions: Persistent critical illness is commonly encountered in clinical practice and is associated with increased healthcare utilisation and adverse outcomes. Improvements in our understanding of the longer term outcomes and in the development of tools to aid prognostication are urgently required - for humane as well as health economic reasons., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Intensive Care Society 2021.)

This study investigated how intensivists make decisions regarding withholding and withdrawing treatment for patients at the end of their lives. This involved completing in-depth interviews from two sites of the South of England, United Kingdom by twelve intensivists. The data collected by these intensivists were analysed using thematic analysis. This resulted in the identification of three themes: intensivists' role, treatment effectiveness, and patients' best interest. Transcending these were two overarching themes relating to the balance between quantity and quality of life, and the intensivists' sense of responsibility versus burden. The results are considered in terms of making sense of death and the role of beliefs in the decision-making process.