Search

Gastrointestinal complaints without obvious organic causes confirmed by clinical laboratory analyses, endoscopy or radiology are often referred to functional entities. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common functional disorder in the gut. Careful examination of these patients may reveal other diagnoses of defined etiologies, e.g., enteric neuropathy, microscopic colitis, and primary Sjögre’s syndrome. The present case describes a young patient with incapacitating gastrointestinal symptoms presumed to be IBS, who underwent endoscopic full-thickness biopsy in sigmoid colon. Histopathological examination revealed degenerative enteric neuropathy, possibly secondary to chronic ischemia.

Purpose: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of X-ray mammography and of MR imaging in 238 consecutively operated breasts, and to correlate the findings to histopathological diagnosis. Material and Methods: Over 15 months, 220 patients scheduled for breast surgery were examined consecutively, before surgery, by means of both mammography and MR imaging. of the 220 patients, 18 underwent bilateral breast surgery. The entire breast was examined by means of T1-weighted transversal images using a 3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence. One pre— and 2 post-contrast scans were performed. Each breast was examined by means of mammography and 3 views were applied as routine. All palpable and mammographically suspect lesions were examined on additional images as microfocus magnification or spot compression. The two methods were evaluated independently of each other. Results: In total, 145 malignant and 93 benign lesions were found at histopathological examination. The sensitivity of mammography was 89% and MR imaging 92%. The specificity was 72% in both methods. When the results of the 2 methods were combined, a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 55% was achieved. Conclusion: Mammography and MR imaging seemed to complement each other to produce a high sensitivity. Unfortunately it is impossible at present to supplement mammography with MR imaging in each patient as a routine owing to the current technical and financial limitations.

Purpose: The aim of our prospective study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MR mammography (MRM) in detecting malignant disease. Material and Methods: In 231 consecutive patients scheduled for surgery because of mammographic or palpable lesions suspected of malignancy, the breasts were examined with T1-weighted transversal images using a 3-D fast low angle shot (FLASH) sequence. One pre- and 2 post-contrast images were obtained. Histological examination of the surgical specimens showed carcinoma in 155 breasts, of which 138 were invasive and 17 in situ. Results: MRM detected 144 of the 155 malignancies and was false-negative in 11 cases. Eight of these MRM-missed tumours were invasive and 3 were in situ cancers. Benign lesions were found at microscopy in 95 breasts, of which MRM correctly diagnosed 69. The cellular composition of the 26 false-positive lesions (myxomatous stromal change, high vascularity, and epithelial or apocrine hyperplasia) might explain the false positivity. The sensitivity and specificity of MRM were 93% and 73%, respectively. Conclusion: MRM should be interpreted with caution, and supplemented with e.g. mammography and ultrasonography.