Search

Objective: To propose and develop a histopathological criteria to help diagnose vascular malformations., Methods: All patients who underwent surgical resection and had a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of vascular malformations from 01 March 2018-26 February 2020 were included. A criteria based on 10 parameters was developed to help diagnose vascular malformations. Discrepancies between clinical and histopathological diagnosis were evaluated., Results: A total of 18 cases were identified. There was a discrepancy between the clinical diagnosis and the initially reported histopathological diagnosis in 16 cases (88.9%). This was reduced to 7 (38.9%) and 6 cases (33.3%) with first and second time revised histopathological analysis using proposed criteria., Conclusions: The discrepancy between clinical and histopathological diagnoses of vascular malformations has highlighted the requirement of an agreed criteria for histopathologists to help formulate their diagnosis. The proposed criteria may be used as a guide in addressing this and guide treatment and improve clinical practice.

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the early follow-up quality of life (QoL), pain and mental health of patients with congenital vascular malformation (CVM) from a variety of treatment options., Methods: All patients with CVM who received care and had follow-up between February 1st 2018 and January 31st 2020 were included. The health-related QoL, pain, and mental health were assessed with RAND Health Care 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), visual analogue score for pain (VAS-P) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Paired t-test was used for all analyses. p < .05 were considered significant., Results: In total, 110 patients with a mean age of 36.9 years were included in this study. In all patients following care, significant improvement was found in the bodily pain domain of SF-36 and VAS-P (both p = .01). This was largely driven by high-flow vascular malformation patients who responded better to embolo-sclerotherapy, which revealed significant improvement in the bodily pain domain of SF-36 ( p = .002) and VAS-P ( p = .02). Patients who received supportive treatment only reported significant improvement in mental health ( p = .004) and social functioning ( p = .03) domains of SF-36. Meanwhile, patients treated with embolo-sclerotherapy reported significant improvement only in VAS-P ( p = .02)., Conclusions: This study concluded that the effects of care on early follow-up QoL, pain and mental health of patients with CVM were heterogenous. Future research should therefore, include larger sample size and longer term follow-up to understand the various factors that affect the QoL and mental health of these patients, as well as the holistic approaches to manage them.

Objective: Current data on the nature and rate of major complications for embolo-sclerotherapy (EST) of vascular malformations are scarce. However, even fewer studies focus on vascular malformations specific to the head and neck, which confer an increased specific risk of airway compromise, neurologic and ophthalmologic injury. More understanding is required surrounding the type and incidence of complications to improve treatment planning and informed consent. Therefore, this study aimed to review major complications secondary to EST of head and neck vascular malformations over a 5-year period in a single specialized multidisciplinary centre for vascular anomalies., Methods: All interventions were decided by the multidisciplinary team. Demographic, procedural and complication data between 1st January 2013 and 31st December 2017 were prospectively documented in a dedicated database and analysed. EST of high-flow vascular malformations (HFVMs) was performed by selective catheter angiography or direct injection, and by direct injection only for low-flow vascular malformations (LFVMs). Major complications were defined as any tissue or functional damage caused by direct injection, distal embolization or tissue reaction and were decided by the multidisciplinary team., Results: Forty-eight patients (median age of 35 years; range of 14-70 years; 18 men and 30 women) had 100 EST procedures for head and neck vascular malformation. Of these, 14 patients had EST for HFVM and 34 patients for LFVM, total 43 and 57 procedures, respectively. Overall, five patients with HFVM developed major complications from EST when compared with two patients with LFVM ( p = 0.0167). Two patients required pre-emptive tracheostomy due to risk of post-operative airway compromise. Overall, seven (14.6%) patients experienced major complication from EST. In the HFVM group, major complications from EST occurred in five patients; four cases of tissue ulceration and necrosis (two needed debridement, one healed with resultant fibrosis that impeded speech and one resolved spontaneously) and one post-procedural airway compromise requiring tracheostomy. Meanwhile, in the LFVM group, major complications occurred in two patients; one case of severe necrosis involving the alar cartilage, lip and cheek requiring debridement and reconstruction under plastics and one simple cellulitis. No patients sustained stroke or vision impairment., Conclusions: EST is relatively safe for head and neck vascular malformations in a high-volume experienced centre. Our major complication rate of 14.6% per patient (35.7% for HFVM; 5.9% for LFVM) or 7% per procedure (11.6% for HFVM; 3.5% LFVM) compares favourably with published data from other centres. These data will improve treatment planning and informed consent for EST for both HFVM and LFVM of the head and neck.

Venous malformations (VMs) are ectatic channels which arise as a result of vascular dysmorphogenesis, commonly caused by activating mutations in the endothelial tyrosine kinase receptor (TIE2)/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3Kinase) pathway. With a prevalence of 1% in the general population, and a diverse clinical presentation depending on site, size and tissue involvement, their treatment requires a personalised and multidisciplinary approach. Larger lesions are complicated by local intravascular coagulopathy (LIC) causing haemorrhagic and/or thrombotic complications which can progress to disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC)., Methods: We performed a literature review using a PubMed® search and identified 15 articles to include. References of these texts were examined to further expand the literature review. Principle findings: Several treatment options have been explored, including compression, sclerotherapy, laser therapy, cryoablation and surgery in addition to the management of LIC with low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) and other anticoagulants. Targeted molecular therapies acting on the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3Kinase)/Protein Kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway are newly emerging., Conclusion: Despite a wealth of literature, larger, multi-centric, randomised and prospective trails are required to offer further clarification on the therapeutic management of coagulopathy control and to provide symptomatic benefit to patients with VMs. There should be efforts to provide long term follow up and to use standardised risk stratification tools and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires to aid comparison of agents and treatment protocols.

Objective: The current literature on the major complications of embolo-sclerotherapy of upper and lower extremity vascular malformations is scarce. Evaluating and understanding the rates and types of potential major complications of embolo-sclerotherapy of vascular malformations help treatment planning and informed consent. Therefore, this study reviewed major complications following embolo-sclerotherapy of all upper and lower extremity vascular malformations in a single specialized multidisciplinary vascular malformation center over a 5-year period., Methods: All patients with vascular malformations underwent multidisciplinary directed intervention. Demographic, procedural, follow-up, and complication data were collected prospectively in a dedicated database, and reviewed retrospectively. Major complications for upper and lower extremity vascular malformations from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2017 were analyzed. All embolo-sclerotherapies of high-flow vascular malformations (HFVMs) were performed under selective catheter angiography and direct injection, but low-flow vascular malformations (LFVM) with direct injection only. Major complications were defined as any tissue or functional damage caused by direct injection, distal embolization, or tissue reaction., Results: Seventy patients (median age of 25 years; 44 males and 26 females) had 150 embolo-sclerotherapy procedures for upper extremity vascular malformation. Of these, 28 patients had embolo-sclerotherapy for HFVM and 42 patients for LFVM; total 78 and 72 procedures, respectively. A total of 107 patients (median age of 26 years; 42 males and 65 females) had 160 embolo-sclerotherapy interventions for lower extremity vascular malformations. Of these, 18 patients had embolo-sclerotherapy for HFVM and 89 patients for LFVM; total of 30 and 130 procedures, respectively. The overall major complication rates following embolo-sclerotherapy of upper and lower extremity vascular malformations were 14.3% and 4.7%, respectively ( P  = 0.030). In the upper extremity HFVM group, major complications from embolo-sclerotherapy occurred in five patients; three ischemic fingers requiring amputation and two skin ulcerations. Meanwhile, in the upper extremity LFVM group, major complications occurred in five patients; one median nerve injury requiring nerve grafting and hand therapy, one hand contracture requiring tendon release, and three skin ulcerations. There was only one major complication, which was cellulitis in the lower extremity HFVM group. In the lower extremity LFVM group, major complications occurred in four patients; two skin ulcerations, one cellulitis, and one deep vein thrombosis., Conclusions: Embolo-sclerotherapy is relatively safe for upper and lower extremity vascular malformations in a high-volume experienced center where our major complication rates were 14.3% and 4.7%, respectively, which compare favorably or similar to those reported in most recent literature. These outcomes will direct treatment strategies to avoid local and systemic toxic complications in the upper and lower extremity, for both HFVM and LFVM, and to improve informed consent.

Objectives: Foundation Year Ones (FY1s) are the most junior doctors in the UK who are often required to prescribe intravenous fluid to patients not under their regular care, during on-call or out-of-hours ward cover. This study aimed to investigate FY1s' practice and decision-making process of intravenous fluid prescribing to these patients., Design: Questionnaire survey., Setting: Survey on Practices during on-calls and out-of-hours ward covers., Participants: FY1s of five National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England and Scotland., Results: All 149 FY1s responded to survey. Eighty-six percent have been taught intravenous fluid prescribing during medical school, compared with only 48% in FY1 induction. More than half always/often checked the patient's urea and electrolytes (U&Es) (72%), read the fluid balance (58%) and observation charts (80%), discussed the case with nursing staff (75%), enquired about oral status (82%), identified the main diagnosis/operation (75%) and indication for intravenous fluid (72%) of the patient when prescribing intravenous fluid. However, less than half often/always read the medical notes (43%) or performed clinical examinations on patients (16%). Most FY1s (94%) always/often checked patient's U&Es when prescribing potassium., Conclusions: The questionnaire study demonstrated variations among FY1s in the practice and decision-making process of intravenous fluid prescribing to patients unknown to them, during on-calls or out-of-hours ward covers. Such variations in practice should be addressed especially by medical and foundation schools, and NHS hospitals to improve patient care.