Search

Reverse T3 (3,3',5'-triiodothyronine or rT3) is the third most abundant iodothyronine circulating in human blood and is produced by the inner ring deiodination of the pro-hormone thyroxine (T4). Unlike the more abundant and active metabolite T3, the measurement of serum rT3 is yet to find a routine clinical application. As rT3 binds weakly to the T3 thyroid nuclear hormone receptors, it is thought to represent an inactive end-product of thyroid hormone metabolism, diverting T4 away from T3 production. The analysis of serum rT3 has, up until recently, been measured by competitive radioimmunoassay, but these methods have been superseded by mass-spectrometric methods which are less susceptible to interference from other more abundant iodothyronines. Serum rT3 concentration is increased as part of the non-thyroidal illness syndrome, and by administration of common medications such as amiodarone which inhibit the metabolism of rT3. Serum rT3 concentration is also affected by genetic conditions that affect the iodothyronine deiodinases, as well as thyroid transporters and transport proteins. Analysis of rT3 can provide a useful diagnostic fingerprint for these conditions. rT3 has been shown to bind extra-nuclear iodothyronine receptors with a potential role in cell proliferation; however, the clinical relevance of these findings awaits further study.

Background: Antithyroglobulin antibodies are a prevalent cause of interference in serum thyroglobulin immunoassays. Current guidelines recommend that antithyroglobulin antibodies should be measured concurrently with thyroglobulin when monitoring thyroid cancer patients post-thyroidectomy. However, the concordance between different antithyroglobulin assays has been questioned despite the availability of an international thyroglobulin antibody Reference Preparation., Methods: Four antithyroglobulin assays currently in use in UK laboratories (Siemens Immulite(®), Brahms GmbH, PerkinElmer AutoDELFIA and Siemens ADVIA Centaur(®)) were compared in a cohort of 145 thyroid cancer patients., Results: Using reference data provided by the kit manufacturer, concordance between the assays was 74%. Adjusting the cut-offs to maximize agreement increased concordance to 90%. Recovery of exogenous thyroglobulin using the Brahms Tg-plus immunoradiometric assay was neither a specific nor a sensitive test for the presence of a positive antibody result by any assay., Conclusions: Despite the availability of an international reference preparation, current antithyroglobulin assays show unacceptable variance.

Current guidance recommends titrating the dose of metyrapone against serum cortisol concentration, in patients under medical management of Cushing's syndrome. In the UK, this almost always involves measuring serum cortisol concentration by immunoassay, the performance of which is questionable in the presence of altered steroid metabolism. Sera from two patients receiving metyrapone were analysed using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (MS) steroid assay to identify which steroids, if any, were elevated in these patients. In addition, control serum was spiked with a series of steroids to identify any potential positive interferences in a cortisol immunoassay. Serum 11-deoxycortisol concentration was elevated in both of the patients studied. One patient also had an elevated serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone concentration and the other an elevated androstenedione. In addition, the results of the interference studies indicated that the cortisol immunoassay was susceptible to interference from 11-deoxycortisol, 17-hydroxyprogesterone and 21-deoxycortisol. However, the magnitude of interference, in the serum cortisol immunoassay, due to these three steroids could not account for the discrepancy between the cortisol concentrations measured by immunoassay and those measured by MS. Both clinicians and laboratory staff should be aware of these interferences when monitoring patients undergoing treatment with metyrapone, and consequently serum should be measured in these patients by MS, not by immunoassay.

Interference in immunoassay caused by endogenous immunoglobulin is a cause of incorrect laboratory results that can drastically affect patient management. Two cases of immunoglobulin interference in serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) assays are presented. These cases illustrate two common mechanisms for false-positive interference in two-site (sandwich) immunoassays. The first case describes a circulating autoimmune FSH immunoglobulin complex ('macro'-FSH), which has not been previously described for FSH, and the second a cross-linking antibody directed against the assay reagents. Immunoglobulin interference was detected and characterized using a combination of method comparison, immunosubtraction and size exclusion chromatography.

Background: The stability of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in whole blood has not been well characterized. Previous studies show EDTA plasma samples to be more stable than serum samples., Methods: Blood from 17 haemodialysis patients and five healthy volunteers was collected into serum separator tubes (SSTs) and potassium EDTA tubes (EDTA-Ts) and incubated at room temperature before separation and storage for PTH analysis using the Bayer Advia Centaur., Results: Initial PTH concentrations were 7% higher (95% confidence interval [CI] 2-16%, P=0.016) in EDTA-Ts compared to the SSTs in the renal cohort. PTH concentrations in SSTs were significantly lower after 8 (10%, 95% CI 3-17%) and 20 h (22%, 95% CI 11-31%) but did not change significantly in EDTA-Ts (P=0.1543). PTH concentration in EDTA-Ts from healthy volunteers was also independent of incubation time (P=0.1165)., Conclusion: The greater stability of PTH in whole blood anticoagulated with potassium EDTA allows PTH analysis to be offered to sites such as satellite clinics and primary care sites which do not have centrifugation and refrigeration facilities.

Background: We evaluated a reverse hybridization method for the simultaneous detection of nine mutations that are associated with Gaucher disease., Results and Conclusion: Results were in agreement with those obtained by a polymerase chain reaction-restriction digestion method. The hybridization method produced results more quickly and with less operator input.