Search

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of a biphasic synthetic scaffold (TruFit, Smith & Nephew) to microfracture for the treatment of knee cartilage defects and identify patient- and lesion-specific factors that influence outcomes., Design: Prospectively collected data from 132 patients (mean age, 41.8 years; 69% male) with isolated chondral or osteochondral femoral defects treated with biphasic synthetic scaffolds ( n = 66) or microfracture ( n = 66) were reviewed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated longitudinally over 5 years with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), Activities of Daily Living of the Knee Outcome Survey (KOS-ADL), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Marx Activity Scale. Cartilage-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to evaluate osseous integration and cartilage fill in a subgroup of patients. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors of clinical outcomes within the scaffold group., Results: Both groups demonstrated clinically significant improvements in knee clinical scores over 5 years ( P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in KOS-ADL and IKDC scores between groups up to 5 years postoperatively. Marx activity level scores in the microfracture group declined over time, while significant improvements in activity level scores were observed in the scaffold group over 5 years ( P < 0.01). Good-quality tissue fill and cartilage isointensity were more often observed in the scaffold group compared with the microfracture group, particularly with longer time intervals. Increasing age, high body mass index, prior microfracture, and traumatic etiology were predictors for inferior outcomes in the scaffold group., Conclusions: Activity level and MRI appearance following treatment of cartilage lesions with the biphasic synthetic scaffold were superior to microfracture over time in this nonrandomized, retrospective comparison.

Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the diagnostic modality of choice in defining soft tissue compromise of the spinal canal. Purpose To evaluate the reliability of postoperative MRI in the determination of level and side of lumbar spinal decompression surgery, investigated by two reviewers, in different levels of training and specialization. Material and Methods Postoperative MR images of 86 patients who underwent spinal decompression (single level, n = 70; multilevel, n = 16; revision decompression, n = 9) were reviewed independently by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist and a fourth-year orthopedic surgery resident. The level (single or multiple) and side of previous surgical decompression were determined and compared to the surgical notes. We examined factors that may have influenced the reliability, including demographics, type of surgical decompression, use of a drain, and time interval from surgery to MRI. Results Significantly fewer levels were correctly determined by the resident (77/86 cases, 89.5%) compared with the radiologist (84/86 cases, 97.7%) ( P = 0.014). The resident interpreted significantly more MR images incorrectly in cases where a drain was used (n = 8; P < 0.001). Re-decompression cases were interpreted incorrectly significantly more often by both the radiologist (n = 2, P = 0.032) and the resident (n = 4, P = 0.014). Conclusion Determination of the level and side operated on in previous lumbar spinal decompression surgery on MRI has a high reliability, especially when performed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. However, this reliability is decreased in cases involving surgical drainage and same-level revision surgery.

Background: Evaluating postoperative femoral neck facture (FNF) with metal fixation hardware is commonly performed using radiographs. MRI has greater sensitivity and specificity to evaluate osteonecrosis (ON) but is often challenging due to the image distortion caused by metallic hardware., Questions/purposes: The aim of this study is to compare fast spin-echo (FSE) and multi-acquisition variable-resonance image combination (MAVRIC) sequences in assessing ON following metallic fixation of FNF and determining feasibility of semi-quantitative perfusion using MAVRIC., Methods: Radiography and MRI were performed at 3 and 12 months postoperatively, using FSE and pre- and post-gadolinium contrast MAVRIC sequences in 21 FNF patients. The presence and volume of ON were recorded. Signal intensity (SI) enhancement was measured on the MAVRIC sequences within the center and rim of ON; with the ilium and femoral diaphysis as controls. The detection rate of ON between MAVRIC and FSE images was evaluated as the difference of percent enhancement across the defined regions of interest., Results: ON was detected in 0% of radiographs, in 67% of FSE, and in 76% of MAVRIC images at 3 months follow-up, with similar results at 12 months. MAVRIC images had larger ON volume than FSE images at both time points. A significant percentage SI enhancement was only detected in the ON rim., Conclusion: Radiographs could not detect ON following metallic fixation of FNF. MAVRIC is more sensitive than FSE for determining the volume of ON. SI measurements using MAVRIC may provide an indirect assessment of perfusion.