1. Topical bethanechol for the improvement of esophageal dysmotility: a pilot study.
- Author
-
O'Rourke A, Weinberger P, Morrison M, Conklin J, and Postma G
- Subjects
- Administration, Topical, Adult, Aged, Cohort Studies, Esophageal Motility Disorders physiopathology, Female, Humans, Male, Manometry, Middle Aged, Peristalsis physiology, Pilot Projects, Treatment Outcome, Bethanechol administration & dosage, Esophageal Motility Disorders drug therapy, Muscarinic Agonists administration & dosage
- Abstract
Objectives: We studied a case series to evaluate the effect of topical bethanechol chloride on esophageal function in individuals with ineffective esophageal motility., Methods: Five subjects with ineffective esophageal motility underwent high resolution esophageal manometry. Ten 5 mL liquid swallows were performed to establish a baseline. Five milligrams of topical bethanechol was then administered. After 10 minutes, the subjects completed 10 additional liquid swallows. This procedure was repeated with 10 mg of bethanechol in 4 subjects., Results: After administration of 5 mg of topical bethanechol, the mean (+/- SD) distal contractile integral, an index of esophageal contractility, increased from 178.3 +/- 83.1 mm Hg x s x cm to 272.3 +/- 216.9 mm Hg x s x cm (p = 0.69). The percentage of failed swallows decreased from 52.8% +/- 33.2% to 29.4% +/- 18.3% (p = 0.14). The percentage of peristaltic swallows increased from 28.0% +/- 26.8% to 67.2% +/- 15.3% (p = 0.04). The contractile front velocity was essentially unchanged. After administration of 10 mg of bethanechol,the distal contractile integral decreased from 349.3 +/- 371.0 mm Hg x s x cm to 261.8 +/- 293.5 mm Hg x s x cm (p = 0.72). The percentage of failed swallows increased from 57.5% +/- 37.7% to 66.8% +/- 24.9% (p = 0.46). The percentage of peristaltic swallows increased from 17.5% +/- 23.6% to 28.3% +/- 19.1% (p = 0.29). The contractile front velocity decreased from 11.6 +/- 5.2 cm/s to 4.9 +/- 3.0 cm/s (p = 0.32). No adverse side effects occurred., Conclusions: The results of this pilot study support the need for further investigation with larger sample sizes and dose escalation.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF