Search

Background/Aims: Growth Hormone (GH) dosage in childhood is adjusted for body size, but there is no consensus whether body weight (BW) or body surface area (BSA) should be used. We aimed at comparing the biological effect and cost-effectiveness of GH treatment dosed per m2 BSA in comparison with dosing per kg BW in girls with Turner syndrome (TS). Methods: Serum IGF-I, GH dose, and adult height gain (AHG) from girls participating in two Dutch and five Swedish studies on the efficacy of GH were analyzed, and the cumulative GH dose and costs were calculated for both dose adjustment methods. Additional medication included estrogens (if no spontaneous puberty occurred) and oxandrolone in some studies. Results: At each GH dose, the serum IGF-I standard deviation score remained stable over time after an initial increase after the start of treatment. On a high dose (at 1 m2 equivalent to 0.056-0.067 mg/kg/day), AHG was at least equal on GH dosed per m2 BSA compared with dosing per kg BW. The cumulative dose and cost were significantly lower if the GH dose was adjusted for m2 BSA. Conclusion: Dosing GH per m2 BSA is at least as efficacious as dosing per kg BW, and is more cost-effective.

In the Dutch growth hormone (GH) registration database there are currently 552 GH-deficient children being treated, subcutaneously, with recombinant human GH six to seven times per week. Of those, 112 who have been treated for at least 2 years have reached final height. Mean age at start of therapy was 11.70 years. Mean GH dose was 15.5 IU/m2 body surface per week. Mean final height was 173.2 cm (boys) and 159.7 cm (girls) and –1.36 SD of the population mean. Of the patients, 73.2% and 63.4%, respectively, reached a final height above –2 SD of the population or within target limits. FH-SDS was higher compared with the results of earlier cohorts with different treatment regimens. Target height, GH peak value at diagnosis, age at start of GH therapy, height SDS (HSDS) at start of puberty, and duration of GH therapy were significantly correlated with final height. These results, combined with those of a prospective GH dose-response study, suggest that better long-term results can be obtained with early and prolonged treatment and if the GH dose is individually adapted to the short-term growth response. In an ongoing dose-response study, 68 girls with Turner’s syndrome, aged 2–11 years, were randomized into three dosage groups with a daily GH dose of: (group A) 4 IU/m2 body surface; (group B) 4 IU/m2 in the first year of therapy and 6 IU/m2 thereafter; (group C) 4 IU/m2 in the first year, 6 IU/m2 in the second year, and 8 IU/m2 thereafter. After 4 years of GH therapy, girls aged 12 years or older started low-dose oestrogen therapy. After 7 years of GH therapy, mean HSDS in all three groups had increased to values above the third percentile for healthy girls. Mean final height and final height gain of 25 girls was 159.1 and 12.5 cm, 161.8 and 14.6 cm, and 162.7 and 16.0 cm in groups A, B and C respectively. These long-term and final height results are more favourable than the results of earlier Dutch Turner’s syndrome studies. Possible explanations are the higher GH doses and/or the younger age at start of GH therapy.