Search

A systematic review was performed of published data on the caries-inhibiting effect of preventive measures during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. The purpose was to develop evidence-based recommendations about the most effective means of preventing white spot lesions in orthodontic patients. The 15 studies included were divided into four groups based on comparable preventive measures: fluoride, chlorhexidine, sealants and bonding materials. The caries-inhibiting effect of the preventive measures was expressed by the prevented fraction (PF). The overall PF of the fluoride-releasing bonding materials was 20% (SEM 0.09). This effect was, however, not statistically significant. It was impossible to calculate an overall PF for the other preventive measures, but the tendency of their caries-inhibiting effect has been described. The use of toothpaste and gel with a high fluoride concentration of 1,500–5,000 ppm or of complementary chlorhexidine during orthodontic treatment showed a demineralisation-inhibiting tendency. The use of a polymeric tooth coating on the tooth surface around the brackets showed almost no demineralisation-inhibiting effect. Many publications had to be excluded from this systematic review because of improper research designs. Future clinical trials are needed to give evidence- based advice on the optimal caries-prevention strategy.

This study aimed to select past caries experience variables as caries predictors and to compare their prognostic accuracy with the variables used in a method of caries prognosis developed in a Swiss child population. The data used for the analyses originated from an 8–year longitudinal study starting in 1980 on caries of 7.5–year–old Dutch children. Stepwise logistic regression analyses provided predictor variables. The newly introduced variables D23fi, D123fi and D23pifi were interchangeable and the most powerful caries predictors. For the sake of uniformity and ease of application, D23fi (number of fissures of the permanent first molar with non–cavitated or cavitated caries lesions) was chosen as the first variable in the logistic regression equations. The gain in accuracy of the second and third predictor variables (number of sound primary molars and the number of buccal and lingual smooth surfaces of the permanent first molar with non–cavitated or cavitated caries) in the regression equations was limited. The D1 condition of surfaces could be omitted from the prediction models. The present forced three–predictor–regression equations for 7.5–, 9.5– and 11.5–year–old children were evaluated to assess their prognostic performance by using the area under the ROC curve as a measure of prognostic quality. For the present regression equations, the area under the ROC curve was 81–87%, which was higher compared to the Swiss regression equations for caries prognosis.

The present study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of three minimally invasive restorative treatment approaches for dentinal lesions in occlusal surfaces. The approaches tested comprised a conventional and a modified–conventional treatment and a modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). The conventional approach was performed in a university dental clinic whilst the modified–conventional, employing portable equipment, and the modified ART, using hand instruments and a caries removal solution (Caridex®), were carried out in the field. Using the split–mouth design, 430 matched contralateral pairs of occlusal cavities were restored with amalgam or glass–ionomers in permanent molars of 152 school children by one dental therapist. The restorations were assessed using a modified USPHS–Ryge criteria. After 2 years, the cumulative survival percentages for occlusal amalgam and glass–ionomer restorations were 92 and 96%, respectively. The survival of all restorations in the conventional, modified–conventional and the modified ART group was 96, 96 and 91%, respectively. The survival of occlusal amalgam and glass–ionomer restorations per treatment group was as follows: 94 and 99%, respectively (conventional group); 95 and 97%, respectively (modified–conventional group), and 89 and 93%, respectively (modified ART group). The differences in survival percentage between restorations with amalgam and glass–ionomer, and between the three restorative treatment approaches were not statistically significant. In countries facing scarcity in resources for dental care, ART seems a promising restorative approach to occlusal caries in posterior teeth. However, a longer clinical observation period is required to substantiate this initial conclusion.

After de- and subsequent remineralization at 0.03 and 1.0 ppm fluoride and either 0, 1, 10, 20 or 25 mM carbonate, artificial lesions in bovine enamel were demineralized again. The amount of secondary demineralization was determined after 15, 30 and 70 h of demineralization by means of quantitative microradiography. The results showed that fluoride incorporated during the remineralization period retards lesion formation during secondary demineralization. Carbonate incorporated during the remineralization period enhances secondary demineralization. An interaction between both ions was observed.