Search

Objective: To develop a noninvasive prenatal testing improvement that allows identification of Robertsonian translocation carriers. Methods: Blood samples from 191 subjects, including 7 pregnant and 9 non-pregnant Robertsonian translocation carriers, were analyzed for fetal trisomy and Robertsonian translocation status. Digital Analysis of Selected Regions (DANSR™) assays targeting sequences common to the p arms of 5 acrocentric chromosomes were developed and added to existing DANSR assays. DANSR products were hybridized onto a custom DNA microarray for DNA analysis. The Fetal-Fraction Optimized Risk of Trisomy Evaluation (FORTE™) algorithm measures the fraction of fetal DNA and accounts for both the fetal and maternal fractions in the cell-free DNA sample to determine Robertsonian risk. The expectation in a Robertsonian translocation carrier is that DANSR assays on acrocentric p arms should have a concentration 20% less than that of controls. Results: The FORTE algorithm correctly classified the fetal trisomy status and maternal Robertsonian translocation status in all 191 samples. Sixteen samples had a Robertsonian risk score above 99%, while 175 samples had a Robertsonian risk score below 0.01%. Conclusions: Robertsonian translocations are the most common chromosomal translocations and can have significant reproductive consequences. A maternal screen for Robertsonian translocation carriers would provide women valuable information regarding the risk of fetal trisomy.

Objective: To develop a microarray-based method for noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and compare it with next-generation sequencing. Methods: Maternal plasma from 878 pregnant women, including 187 trisomy cases (18 trisomy 13, 37 trisomy 18, 132 trisomy 21), was evaluated for trisomy risk. Targeted chromosomes were analyzed using Digital Analysis of Selected Regions (DANSR™) assays. DANSR products were subsequently divided between two DNA quantification methods: microarrays and next-generation sequencing. For both microarray and sequencing methodologies, the Fetal-Fraction Optimized Risk of Trisomy Evaluation (FORTE™) algorithm was used to determine trisomy risk, assay variability across samples, and compute fetal fraction variability within samples. Results: NIPT using microarrays provided faster and more accurate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) measurements than sequencing. The assay variability, a measure of variance of chromosomal cfDNA counts, was lower for microarrays than for sequencing, 0.051 versus 0.099 (p < 0.0001). Analysis time using microarrays was faster, 7.5 versus 56 h for sequencing. Additionally, fetal fraction precision was improved 1.6-fold by assaying more polymorphic sites with microarrays (p < 0.0001). Microarrays correctly classified all trisomy and nontrisomy cases. Conclusions: NIPT using microarrays delivers more accurate cfDNA analysis than next-generation sequencing and can be performed in less time.